| Literature DB >> 24243000 |
Karina Barbosa de Queiroz1, Juliana Bohnen Guimarães, Cândido Celso Coimbra, Gisele Vieira Rodovalho, Cláudia Martins Carneiro, Elísio Alberto Evangelista, Renata Guerra-Sá.
Abstract
The presence of leptin receptors in white adipose tissue (WAT) suggests a type of peripheral control during the development of obesity and other metabolic disorders. Both diet composition and exercise influence serum leptin; however, the effect of their combination on long-term WAT leptin metabolism is unknown. In this study, rats fed with standard or high-sugar diets (HSD) were simultaneously subjected to running training for 4- and 8-week periods, and the retroperitoneal WAT (rWAT) was evaluated for adipocyte cell size, lipid and catecholamine content, Lep, OB-Rb and Ucp2 mRNA transcription levels, and circulating leptin and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). The HSD groups displayed a higher adiposity index and rWAT weight, Lep mRNA and protein upregulation, and a period-dependent effect on OB-Rb mRNA expression. Exercise decreased serum leptin and upregulated the OB-Rb mRNA levels. However, in rats fed with an HSD, the increase in OB-Rb mRNA and reduction in catecholamine levels resulted in a high level of adiposity and hyperleptinemia. The combination of training and an HSD decreases the NEFA levels and upregulating the Ucp2 mRNA expression in the 4-week period, while downregulating the Ucp2 mRNA expression in the 8-week period without changing the NEFA levels. Our results suggest that an HSD induces an increase in leptin expression in rWAT, while reducing adipocytes via leptin-mediated lipolysis after an 8-week period. In exercised rats fed an HSD, TAG synthesis and storage overlaps with lipolysis, promoting fat store development and Lep mRNA and plasma protein upregulation in adult rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24243000 PMCID: PMC3889676 DOI: 10.1007/s11745-013-3854-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids ISSN: 0024-4201 Impact factor: 1.880
Characteristics of rats fed an STD or HSD for 4- and 8-week periods
| Body weight (g) | Calorie intake (kJ) | Adipose index |
| CS activity (μmol/mL/min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-week period | |||||
| S-STD ( | 254.0 ± 9.2 | 334.7 ± 5.9 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 32.2 ± 2.0 | 6.8 ± 0.9 |
| S-HSD ( | 273.0 ± 10.9 | 382.4 ± 6.8 | 3.9 ± 0.2* | 36.8 ± 2.6 | 6.9 ± 0.6 |
| T-STD ( | 234.5 ± 10.6 | 289.5 ± 5.3 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 47 ± 6.3# | 7.9 ± 1.2 |
| T-HSD ( | 262.9 ± 10.2 | 371.5 ± 7.5 | 4.6 ± 0.5* | 53.1 ± 3.5# | 6.4 ± 0.8 |
| 8-week period | |||||
| S-STD ( | 387.3 ± 11.1a | 264.8 ± 8.4 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 51.0 ± 5.0a | 8.8 ± 1.9 |
| S-HSD ( | 404.3 ± 32.3b | 259.8 ± 8.3 | 4.6 ± 0.6* | 48.6 ± 4.7b | 11.3 ± 1.7*, b |
| T-STD ( | 363.8 ± 16.8c | 254 ± 8.0 | 1.5 ± 0.2#, c | 77.9 ± 11.0#, c | 14.9 ± 1.3#, c |
| T-HSD ( | 412.4 ± 6.7d | 264.8 ± 8.4 | 4.3 ± 0.5* | 77.5 ± 11.5#, d | 18.4 ± 1.1*, #, d |
The data are expressed as means ± SD. All comparisons were performed by two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant
S-STD sedentary-standard diet, S-HSD sedentary-high-sugar diet, T-STD trained-standard diet, T-HSD trained-high-sugar diet, W workload, CS citrate synthase
* Statistically significant differences compared with its STD control
#Statistically significant differences compared with its untrained control (S-STD or S-HSD)
aStatistically significant differences compared with the S-STD group (4-week period)
bStatistically significant differences compared with the S-HSD group (4-week period)
cStatistically significant differences compared with the T-STD group (4-week period)
dStatistically significant differences compared with the T-HSD group (4-week period)
Fig. 1The effects of a high-sugar diet and exercise training on rWAT over 4- (white bars) and 8-week (black bars) periods. a Absolute rWAT weights. b The lipid content was measured according to the Folch method. c The total catecholamine content (nM) per mg of rWAT was measured using the tri-hydroxyindole fluorimetric method. The data are expressed as the means ± SD. The effects of diet and/or exercise were compared using two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test), and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *Statistically significant differences compared with its STD control, #statistically significant differences compared with its untrained control (S-STD or S-HSD). aStatistically significant differences compared with the S-STD group (4-week period), bstatistically significant differences compared with the S-HSD group (4-week period), cstatistically significant differences compared with the T-STD group (4-week period) and dstatistically significant differences compared with the T-HSD group (4-week period). S-STD sedentary-standard diet, S-HSD sedentary-high-sugar diet, T-STD trained-standard diet, T-HSD trained-high-sugar diet
Fig. 2The effects of a high-sugar diet and exercise training on adipocyte number and size over 4- (white bars) and 8-week (black bars) periods. a The adipocyte number and b size among the groups were microscopically visualized in a fixed area (7.5 × 105 μm2) and photographed with a digital camera. The data are expressed as the means ± SD. The effects of diet and/or exercise were compared using two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test), and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. c Histological sections of adipocytes’ average area, hematoxylin–eosin. Bar 25 μm. *Statistically significant differences compared with its STD control, #statistically significant differences compared with its untrained control (S-STD or S-HSD). aStatistically significant differences compared with the S-STD group (4-week period), bstatistically significant differences compared with the S-HSD group (4-week period), cstatistically significant differences compared with the T-STD group (4-week period) and dstatistically significant differences compared with the T-HSD group (4-week period). S-STD sedentary-standard diet, S-HSD sedentary-high-sugar diet, T-STD trained-standard diet, T-HSD trained-high-sugar diet
Fig. 3The effects of a high-sugar diet and exercise training on leptin over 4- (white) and 8-week (black) periods. a Leptin serum levels (ng/mL). The data are expressed as the means ± SD. b The Lep and c OB-Rb mRNA levels in rWAT. The gene expression profiles of the S-STD, S-HSD, T-STD and T-HSD groups were evaluated using the 2−ΔΔ method. rRNA 18S was used as a reference gene, and the S-STD group was used as a calibration sample, where its expression was considered as the 1× control index for comparison with the other groups. The effects of diet and/or exercise were compared using two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test), and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *Statistically significant differences compared with its STD control, #statistically significant differences compared with its untrained control (S-STD or S-HSD). aStatistically significant differences compared with the S-STD group (4-week period), bstatistically significant differences compared with the S-HSD group (4-week period), cstatistically significant differences compared with the T-STD group (4-week period) and dstatistically significant differences compared with the T-HSD group (4-week period). S-STD sedentary-standard diet, S-HSD sedentary-high-sugar diet, T-STD trained-standard diet, T-HSD trained-high-sugar diet
Fig. 4The effects of a high-sugar diet and exercise training on NEFA and Ucp2 mRNA expression in rWAT during 4- (white) and 8-week (black) periods. a Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) serum levels (mmol/L). The data are expressed as the means ± SD. b Ucp2 mRNA levels. The gene expression profiles were evaluated for the S-STD, S-HSD, T-STD and T-HSD groups by the 2−ΔΔ method. rRNA 18S was used as a reference gene, and the S-STD group was used as a calibration sample, where its expression was considered as the 1× control index for comparison with the other groups. The effects of diet and/or exercise were compared using two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test), and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. *Statistically significant differences compared with its STD control, #statistically significant differences compared with its untrained control (S-STD or S-HSD). aStatistically significant differences compared with the S-STD group (4-week period), bstatistically significant differences compared with the S-HSD group (4-week period), cstatistically significant differences compared with the T-STD group (4-week period) and dstatistically significant differences compared with the T-HSD group (4-week period). S-STD sedentary-standard diet, S-HSD sedentary-high-sugar diet, T-STD trained-standard diet, T-HSD trained-high-sugar diet