Literature DB >> 24242328

Isokinetic strength testing in monitoring progress in a multidisciplinary work reentry program: A case study.

P F Hickey1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of a patient with a history of low back pain and the use of isokinetic testing in tracking that patient through a work-reentry program. A 44-year-old male with a diagnosis of low back pain underwent a functional capacity evaluation and began a work-reentry program. Initial isokinetic testing revealed low torque outputs in both the trunk and knee flexion and extension tests as well as limited active range of motion. Coefficient of variation appeared to be relatively high and the patient seemed guarded in his movements during the testing. Psychological testing revealed a high fear of reinjury which may have influenced the initial test. Subsequent isokinetic testing performed on the tenth and twenty-fourth days of program and at 1 month post-program exhibited greater than expected increases in torque output. This could be due in part to a reduction in the fear of reinjury, a learning effect with repeated exposure to testing, and the patient's increased confidence in the use of unguarded movements. His trunk range of motion remained essentially the same throughout the serial testing. Pain in the back and left leg was slightly diminished despite an increase in strength and function.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 24242328     DOI: 10.1007/BF01073282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of abdominal and back muscle strength with and without low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson; M Lindh
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1969

2.  Strength increments following massed and distributed practice relative to motor learning.

Authors:  L E Smith
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1974

3.  Influence of training and of inactivity on muscle strength.

Authors:  E A Müller
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Conservative therapy for low back pain. Distinguishing useful from useless therapy.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-26       Impact factor: 56.272

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.