Literature DB >> 24242024

Substitution of cyclophosphamide in the modified BuCy regimen with fludarabine is associated with increased incidence of severe pneumonia: a prospective, randomized study.

Dai-hong Liu1, Lan-ping Xu, Xiao-hui Zhang, Yu Wang, Chen-hua Yan, Jing-zhi Wang, Feng-rong Wang, Yu-qian Sun, Yu Ji, Yuan-yuan Zhang, Kai-yan Liu, Xiao-jun Huang.   

Abstract

The modified busulfan-cyclophosphamide (mBuCy) regimen, combined with hydroxyurea, cytarabine and semustine, is the most frequently used myeloablative conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in our unit. It is unknown, however, whether fludarabine can be substituted for cyclophosphamide in the mBuCy regimen. We carried out a prospective study to compare modified busulfan-fludarabine (mBuF) with mBuCy, aiming to reduce the treatment-related mortality, with non-inferiority of other outcomes. The mBuCy regimen consisted of hydroxyurea 80 mg/kg on day -10; cytarabine 2 g/m(2) on day -9; busulfan 9.6 mg/kg, intravenously on day -8 through -6; and cyclophosphamide 3.6 g/m(2) on day -5 and -4 and semustine 250 mg/m(2) on day -3. In the mBuF regimen, cyclophosphamide was substituted with fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) through day -5 to -1. Mobilized blood and marrow stem cells were collected from HLA-matched siblings. The trial was suspended due to a tendency of higher incidence of severe pneumonia in the mBuF arm, in which 105 patients were enrolled. After follow-up for another 22 months, a significantly increased incidence of severe pneumonia (31.1 %) was observed in the mBuF arm (11.6 % in mBuCy). This finding suggests that it is uncertain whether it is appropriate to substitute fludarabine for cyclophosphamide under any drug combination. This study was registered at www.chictr.org/cn under identifier ChiCTR-TRC-09000470.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24242024     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-013-1460-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  16 in total

1.  Cyclophosphamide metabolism, liver toxicity, and mortality following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  George B McDonald; John T Slattery; Michelle E Bouvier; Song Ren; Ami L Batchelder; Thomas F Kalhorn; H Gary Schoch; Claudio Anasetti; Ted Gooley
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Conditioning with fludarabine and targeted busulfan for transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Martin Bornhauser; Barry Storer; John T Slattery; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg; John Hansen; Paul J Martin; George B McDonald; W Garrett Nichols; Jerald Radich; Ann Woolfrey; Andreas Jenke; Eberhard Schleyer; Christian Thiede; Gerhard Ehninger; Claudio Anasetti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients.

Authors:  Per Ljungman; Paul Griffiths; Carlos Paya
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03-11       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Serum TNFalpha levels in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  X J Huang; J Wan; D P Lu
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Adherence to ATS guidelines for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  D C Malone; H M Shaban
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Conditioning including antithymocyte globulin followed by unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation can achieve comparable outcomes with HLA-identical sibling transplantation.

Authors:  Dao-Pei Lu; Lujia Dong; Tong Wu; Xiao-Jun Huang; Mei-Jie Zhang; Wei Han; Huan Chen; Dai-Hong Liu; Zhi-Yong Gao; Yu-Hong Chen; Lan-Ping Xu; Yao-Chen Zhang; Han-Yun Ren; Dan Li; Kai-Yan Liu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Randomized trial of myeloablative conditioning regimens: busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus busulfan plus fludarabine.

Authors:  Je-Hwan Lee; Young-Don Joo; Hawk Kim; Hun Mo Ryoo; Min Kyoung Kim; Gyeong-Won Lee; Jung-Hee Lee; Won-Sik Lee; Jae-Hoo Park; Sung-Hwa Bae; Myung Soo Hyun; Dae-Young Kim; Sung-Doo Kim; Young Joo Min; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Influence of fludarabine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cytarabine: implications for a continuous infusion schedule.

Authors:  J F Seymour; P Huang; W Plunkett; V Gandhi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Fludarabine-based reduced intensity conditioning transplants have a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation compared with myeloablative transplants.

Authors:  B George; I Kerridge; N Gilroy; G Huang; M Hertzberg; D Gottlieb; K Bradstock
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  New myeloablative conditioning regimen with fludarabine and busulfan for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison with BuCy2.

Authors:  Y S Chae; S K Sohn; J G Kim; Y Y Cho; J H Moon; H J Shin; J S Chung; G J Cho; D H Yang; J-J Lee; Y-K Kim; H-J Kim
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 5.483

View more
  6 in total

1.  Intravenous Busulfan-Based Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens Prior to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Marcelo C Pasquini; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Xiaochun Zhu; Andrew Artz; John DiPersio; Hugo F Fernandez; Shin Mineishi; Masaru Kamishohara; Jayesh Mehta; Yuki Nakamura; Voravit Ratanatharathorn; Ronald Sobecks; Jeanne Burkart; Christopher Bredeson
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A retrospective comparison of BU-fludarabine and BU-CY regimens in elderly patients or in patients with comorbidities who received unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic SCT.

Authors:  Y-Q Sun; L-P Xu; X-H Zhang; D-H Liu; H Chen; Y Wang; C-H Yan; J-Z Wang; F-R Wang; Y-Y Zhang; K-Y Liu; X-J Huang
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Busulfan fludarabine vs busulfan cyclophosphamide as a preparative regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Ben-Barouch; O Cohen; L Vidal; I Avivi; R Ram
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Busulfan plus fludarabine compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Ru Lei; Hong-Li Chen; Fang-Xia Wang; Ju Bai; Ai-Li He
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

5.  Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

Authors:  Francesco Saraceni; Myriam Labopin; Rose-Marie Hamladji; Ghulam Mufti; Gerard Socié; Avichai Shimoni; Jeremy Delage; Eric Deconinck; Patrice Chevallier; Didier Blaise; Jaime Sanz; Anne Huynh; Edouard Forcade; Bipin N Savani; Mohamad Mohty; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-15

6.  Fulminant Laryngeal-tracheobronchial-pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Rare and Fatal Complication in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Ying-Hui Zhang; Sheng-Li Xue; De-Pei Wu; Feng Chen
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.271

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.