Literature DB >> 24241721

Dose-response modeling of etoposide-induced DNA damage response.

Zhenhong Li1, Bin Sun, Rebecca A Clewell, Yeyejide Adeleye, Melvin E Andersen, Qiang Zhang.   

Abstract

The 2007 National Research Council Report "Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and A Strategy" recommended an integrated, toxicity pathway-oriented approach for chemical testing. As an integral component of the recommendation, computational dose-response modeling of toxicity pathways promises to provide mechanistic interpretation and prediction of adverse cellular outcomes. Among the many toxicity pathways, the DNA damage response is better characterized and thus more suited for computational modeling. In the present study, we formulated a minimal mathematical model of this pathway to examine the dose response for etoposide (ETP), an anticancer drug that causes DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). In the model, DSB results from inhibition of topoisomerase by ETP and p53 is activated by a bistable switch composed of a positive feedback loop between ATM and γH2AX. Our stochastic model recapitulated the dose response for several molecular biomarkers measured with flow cytometry in HT1080 cells, including phosphorylated p53, ATM, γH2AX, and micronuclei. Model simulations were consistent with a bimodal pattern of p53 activation and a graded population-averaged response at high ETP concentrations. The graded response was a result of heterogeneous activation of individual cells due to molecular stochasticity. This work shows the value of combining data collection on single cell responses and mechanistic, stochastic modeling to develop and test hypothesis for the circuitry of important toxicity pathways. Future studies will determine how well this initial modeling effort agrees with a broader set of experimental studies on pathway responses by examining a more diverse group of DNA-damaging compounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage.; bimodal; bistable; etoposide; p53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24241721     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kft259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  9 in total

1.  MiR-101 induces senescence and prevents apoptosis in the background of DNA damage in MCF7 cells.

Authors:  Siddharth Manvati; Kailash Chandra Mangalhara; P Kalaiarasan; Niloo Srivastava; Bhupender Kumar; R N K Bamezai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The dual topoisomerase inhibitor A35 preferentially and specially targets topoisomerase 2α by enhancing pre-strand and post-strand cleavage and inhibiting DNA religation.

Authors:  Wuli Zhao; Guohua Jiang; Chongwen Bi; Yangbiao Li; Jingbo Liu; Cheng Ye; Hongwei He; Liang Li; Danqing Song; Rongguang Shao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-10

3.  miR-15a/miR-16 down-regulates BMI1, impacting Ub-H2A mediated DNA repair and breast cancer cell sensitivity to doxorubicin.

Authors:  Nibedita Patel; Koteswara Rao Garikapati; Raj K Pandita; Dharmendra Kumar Singh; Tej K Pandita; Utpal Bhadra; Manika Pal Bhadra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  DNA damage response induced by Etoposide promotes steroidogenesis via GADD45A in cultured adrenal cells.

Authors:  Mimi Tamamori-Adachi; Akane Koga; Takao Susa; Hiroko Fujii; Masao Tsuchiya; Hiroko Okinaga; Harumi Hisaki; Masayoshi Iizuka; Shigetaka Kitajima; Tomoki Okazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Targeting RAD51 enhances chemosensitivity of adult T‑cell leukemia‑lymphoma cells by reducing DNA double‑strand break repair.

Authors:  Meng Yang; Xiaoxue Tian; Zhuoyi Fan; Wenlei Yu; Zheng Li; Jie Zhou; Wenjun Zhang; Aibin Liang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.906

6.  Targeting the DNA Damage Response to Increase Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy Cytotoxicity in T-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Martina Magni; Chiara Paolizzi; Chiara Monfrini; Cristina Vella; Paolo Corradini; Cristiana Carniti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Virtual screening-driven repositioning of etoposide as CD44 antagonist in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Charmina Aguirre-Alvarado; Aldo Segura-Cabrera; Inés Velázquez-Quesada; Miguel A Hernández-Esquivel; Carlos A García-Pérez; Sandra L Guerrero-Rodríguez; Angel J Ruiz-Moreno; Andrea Rodríguez-Moreno; Sonia M Pérez-Tapia; Marco A Velasco-Velázquez
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-26

8.  Targeting of Chk2 as a countermeasure to dose-limiting toxicity triggered by topoisomerase-II (TOP2) poisons.

Authors:  Prashanth Gokare; Arunasalam Navaraj; Shengliang Zhang; Noboru Motoyama; Shen-Shu Sung; Niklas K Finnberg
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-17

Review 9.  Bridging the Data Gap From in vitro Toxicity Testing to Chemical Safety Assessment Through Computational Modeling.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Jin Li; Alistair Middleton; Sudin Bhattacharya; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.