Literature DB >> 24241536

High prevalence of MAP2K1 mutations in variant and IGHV4-34-expressing hairy-cell leukemias.

Joshua J Waterfall1, Evgeny Arons2, Robert L Walker1, Marbin Pineda1, Laura Roth2, J Keith Killian1, Ogan D Abaan1, Sean R Davis1, Robert J Kreitman2, Paul S Meltzer1.   

Abstract

To understand the genetic mechanisms driving variant and IGHV4-34-expressing hairy-cell leukemias, we performed whole-exome sequencing of leukemia samples from ten affected individuals, including six with matched normal samples. We identified activating mutations in the MAP2K1 gene (encoding MEK1) in 5 of these 10 samples and in 10 of 21 samples in a validation set (overall frequency of 15/31), suggesting potential new strategies for treating individuals with these diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24241536      PMCID: PMC3905739          DOI: 10.1038/ng.2828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


To understand the genetic mechanisms driving variant and IGHV4-34 expressing hairy-cell leukemia, we performed whole exome sequencing of ten patients including six with matched normal samples. Activating mutations in the MAP2K1 gene (encoding MEK1) were observed in five of these ten patients and in 10 of 21 in a validation set (overall frequency 15 of 31) suggesting potential new therapeutic approaches for these patients. Hairy-cell leukemia-variant (HCLv) is a chronic mature B-cell neoplasm with little available data regarding the genetic mechanisms driving pathogenesis. HCLv shares overlapping pathological features with classic hairy-cell leukemia (HCLc) but the two malignancies have distinct morphologies, immunophenotypes, molecular signatures, and clinical courses. Accordingly, they are classified separately by the latest World Health Organization guidelines. While purine analog therapy (i.e. cladribine or pentostatin) leads to a median survival of over 20 years and durable complete remissions in the vast majority of HCLc patients, it is largely ineffective in HCLv where only 50% of patients exhibit even a partial response. It has recently been shown that 40% of HCLv samples and 10% of HCLc samples express the IGHV4-34 immunoglobulin variable heavy chain rearrangement (IGHV4-34+). Independent of the variant/classic diagnosis, IGHV4-34 expression is associated with higher disease burden at diagnosis, poor response to single agent cladribine, and shorter overall survival[1]. HCLc was recently shown to be almost universally driven by the oncogenic activating V600E mutation in the serine/threonine kinase BRAF[2]. This finding has been validated multiple times and targeted therapy for BRAF V600E has shown clinical benefit in refractory HCLc[3]. However, multiple reports have failed to identify any instances of BRAF V600 mutations in either HCLv or IGHV4-34+ HCLc[2,4-6]. We performed whole exome sequencing on ten HCL samples that were either variant (n=5), IGHV4-34 positive (n=3), or both (n=2) (Supplementary Table 1). Differentiating HCLv from splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) and similar entities can be difficult or sometimes even impossible, particularly without splenic pathology. However the presence of CD103 and absence of CD25 on nearly all of the HCLv cases supports this diagnosis, and the two CD103-negative cases were supported by splenic tissue analysis. Each tumor sample had a post-treatment blood sample to serve as a matched normal. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq with paired-end 101 bp reads to an average depth of 46x (Supplementary Table 2). Analysis of sample purity showed that while all tumor samples had minimal normal contamination, four of the post-treatment blood samples still had high tumor content and were insufficient for identifying somatic variants (Supplementary Figure 1). These were therefore discarded, leaving six matched and four unmatched tumor samples (online Methods). Filtering the variant calls to identify candidate driver genes (online Methods) identified five recurrent targets: MAP2K1, U2AF1, ARID1A, TP53, and TTN (Table 1).
Table 1

Recurrent mutated genes from whole exome sequencing

Reference sequences are NM_002755 (MAP2K1), NM_001025203 (U2AF1), NM_006015 (ARID1A), NM_001126114 (TP53), and NM_003319 (TTN).

DiagnosisPatient MAP2K1 U2AF1 ARID1A TP53 TTN
HCLv IGHV4-34-RB31c.361T>A p.Cys121Ser
10821c.782+2T>G
10984c.159T>A p.Phe53Leuc.101C>T p.Ser34Phec.711G>T p.Met237Ile;c.427G>A p.Val143Met
BL14c.125_172del p.Leu42_Lys57delc.4716C>G p.Tyr1572*;c.4709C>G p.Ser1570Cys
RG01c.42055C>T p.Arg14019*
HCLv IGHV4-34+RG06
BL26c.101C>T p.Ser34Phe
HCLc IGHV4-34+10748c.1690_1691insC p.Gln564fsc.57477G>A p.Met19159Ile
HH14c.171G>T p.Lys57Asn
BL42c.308T>A p.Ile103Asn
The most frequently mutated gene was MAP2K1, occurring in five of ten separate samples. We validated this finding in a set of 21 additional samples (Supplementary Table 1). Sanger sequencing of the affected exons (exons 2 and 3) revealed ten more mutation positive samples for an overall frequency of 48% (95% CI 30%-67%) (Supplementary Table 3). MAP2K1 mutations occurred in all three subtypes of HCL examined (6 of 15 HCLv IGHV4-34-, 4 of 9 HCLv IGHV4-34+, and 5 of 7 HCLc IGHV4-34+ overall) with no significant differences in frequency (p > 0.1 for all pairwise comparisons by Fisher Exact Test). MAP2K1 encodes the dual specificity kinase MEK1, which is a direct effector of BRAF and directly upstream of ERK1/2 in the MAPK pathway. The BRAF V600E mutation occurred in one of the initial ten whole exome discovery set samples as well as in two of the 21 validation set samples by TaqMan PCR and was mutually exclusive of MAP2K1 mutations (Supplementary Table 3). MAP2K1 mutations have been identified infrequently in the developmental disorder cardio-facio-cutaneous (CFC) syndrome, in several cancers including melanoma, ovarian carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer and have also recently emerged as a mode of resistance to BRAF MAP2K1 V600E targeted therapy[7]. With the exception of one instance of SMZL[8], mutations have never been reported in any hematologic malignancy and never with an incidence approaching this frequency in any cancer. The mutations we identified in MAP2K1 gene map to the negative regulatory region, the catalytic core (but not the active site), and the intervening linker[7] (Figure 1). All but one of the mutations are substitutions, most of which have been identified before either in patient samples from other types of cancer or by in vitro screens and have been shown to strongly increase basal enzymatic activity and cell proliferation[9-12]. The only non-substitution mutation is a forty-eight nucleotide in-frame deletion (amino acids 42 through 57) that almost entirely removes the auto-inhibitory helix-A[13]. A highly similar deletion (residues 44 through 51) has been shown to increase basal activity of the enzyme by 60-fold[14]. These findings are of profound importance since MEK inhibitors have been under intense development as a mechanism to suppress mitogenic signaling and as a means of complementing clinical benefit of mutant BRAF inhibitors[15]. Current MEK inhibitors function by an allosteric mechanism dependent on the same N-terminal auto-inhibitory domains where these mutations cluster. The most common mutation in our cohort, C121S, as well as I103N and Q56P have previously been shown to confer resistance to current MEK inhibitors[9,10] while the K57N mutation remains sensitive[11]. Thus, while the current repertoire of MEK inhibitors are not expected to be clinically beneficial for all patients, MEK1 and its effector ERK remain very attractive targets for therapy in this leukemia. The uniquely high incidence of MAP2K1 mutations may also be of diagnostic utility for this disease. To validate the association of MAP2K1 mutations with these forms of HCL we also investigated 20 cases of IGHV4-34-negative HCLc (Supplementary Table 1). Seventeen of these samples were BRAF V600E positive and one sample had a MAP2K1 F53L mutation (Supplementary Table 3), supporting previous findings that BRAF V600E is largely specific to IGHV4-34 negative HCLc. The robust segregation of mutations in BRAF and MAP2K1 with different forms of HCL demonstrates that the mutations are not redundant in this context, possibly due to quantitative effects on pathway activation, qualitative effects on feedback pathways, or other mechanisms.
Figure 1

Distribution of mutations in MAP2K1

Schematic of the MEK1 protein and MAP2K1 gene structure. Somatic mutations identified in variant and IGHV4-34 expressing hairy cell leukemia samples cluster in exons 2 and 3 encoding the N-terminal auto-regulatory domain. Triangles above the protein indicate substitutions and the bar below indicates the in-frame deletion.

Results from our whole exome sequencing revealed four additional candidate driver genes each mutated in two of ten patients: TP53, U2AF1, ARID1A and TTN. We did not pursue TTN because it encodes the longest protein in the genome with a well-described muscle-specific function and the mutations are therefore likely to be passengers. TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene across all cancers and somatic mutation and loss of heterozygosity at this locus have previously been associated specifically with HCLv[16]. U2AF1 is a component of the splicing machinery that recognizes and binds to the 3’ splice site. The hotspot S34F mutation was found in two of the ten discovery set samples and has been observed before in several other hematopoietic malignancies[17] and in a small fraction of lung adenocarcinomas[18]. Amongst hematopoietic malignancies U2AF1 mutations have previously been restricted to myeloid disorders however the splicing machinery component SF3B1 is mutated in roughly 10% of chronic lymphocytic leukemias, another mature B-cell malignancy. We performed Sanger sequencing of this hotspot in our validation set and identified one additional case (Supplementary Table 3). While this could reflect the true frequency, it should also be noted that in the two initial S34F positive samples the variant allele frequency was low (17% and 22%), possibly due to being sub-clonal, and could be below the level of detection for Sanger sequencing. Two of the initial ten samples contained truncating mutations in the tumor suppressor ARID1A, a core component of the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SWI/SNF. Loss of function mutations in ARID1A have been identified in many different cancers including several B cell malignancies[19]. In conclusion, we find a remarkably high frequency of MAP2K1 mutations driving variant and IGHV4-34 expressing hairy cell leukemia. The development of inhibitors towards these mutated forms of MEK1 or its presumed target ERK could transform the treatment of patients with this disease.

Online Methods

Sample Collection

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood of patients being treated on or screened for HCL protocols at the National Institutes of Health, approved by the Investigational Review Board of the National Cancer Institute. Informed consent was obtained from all research participants under study NCT01087333. The diagnosis of HCLc and HCLv and molecular characterizations of IGHV rearrangements were performed as previously described[20]. DNA Samples were extracted using a Precision System Science automated robot (PSS USA).

Whole Exome Sequencing

DNA (1μg) was fragmented using a Covaris S2 Focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA) to a mean size of 300bp. Fragment ends were repaired and phosphorylated with T4 DNA Polymerase (NEB), Klenow-fragment (NEB) and T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (NEB). A 3’-A overhang was introduced with Klenow exo-minus (NEB) followed by ligation to Illumina paired-end adapters. Ligation products with a mean size of 240bp +/− 20% were isolated on a Caliper LabChip XT (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) followed by amplification using Illumina PCR primers InPE1.0, InPE2.0 and PCR primer indices. Pooled, indexed libraries were captured using the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon, 50Mb Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA)

Mutation and Sample Purity Analysis

After assessing sample purity (Supplementary Note), somatic mutation calls for individuals RB31, BL26, BL14, 10984, RG06, and RG01 were combined with non-reference variants in the tumor samples for individuals BL42, HH14, 10748, and 10821. These pooled variants were then filtered against public and in-house databases to remove common variants and possible artifacts. To identify candidate driver genes we further filtered for non-silent variants occurring at conserved positions. All such variants are listed in Supplementary Table 4. Finally, the count of such variants for each gene was used to identify recurrently targeted genes (i.e. in more than one sample), insisting that at least one such mutation be clearly somatic (i.e. in one of the six samples where this could be discerned). See Supplementary Note for more details.

Sanger Sequencing

Exons two and three of MAP2K1 and exon 2 of U2AF1 were sequenced in 21 additional HCL patients. Forward and reverse primers were tailed with M13 tags for downstream sequencing by M13 sequencing primers. DNA was sequenced using BigDye Terminator V3.1 sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and the 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Results were analyzed using Variant Reporter V1.0 (Applied Biosystems). Supplementary Table 5 lists sequences for primers used in the sequencing assay.

TaqMan Real-Time PCR

The Custom Taqman SNP Genotyping Assay (ABI) for BRAF V600E was designed to detect BRAF c.1799T>A (Supplementary Table 5). Assays were run in duplicates with a final 1X concentration of probe mix and Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix (ABI) using 10-20 ng of template DNA.
  20 in total

1.  Crystal structures of MEK1 binary and ternary complexes with nucleotides and inhibitors.

Authors:  Thierry O Fischmann; Catherine K Smith; Todd W Mayhood; Joseph E Myers; Paul Reichert; Anthony Mannarino; Donna Carr; Hugh Zhu; Jesse Wong; Rong-Sheng Yang; Hung V Le; Vincent S Madison
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  High-resolution genomic profiling in hairy cell leukemia-variant compared with typical hairy cell leukemia.

Authors:  S L Hockley; G J Morgan; P E Leone; B A Walker; A Morilla; M Else; A Wotherspoon; C Dearden; D Catovsky; D Gonzalez; E Matutes
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  BRAF mutations in hairy-cell leukemia.

Authors:  Enrico Tiacci; Vladimir Trifonov; Gianluca Schiavoni; Antony Holmes; Wolfgang Kern; Maria Paola Martelli; Alessandra Pucciarini; Barbara Bigerna; Roberta Pacini; Victoria A Wells; Paolo Sportoletti; Valentina Pettirossi; Roberta Mannucci; Oliver Elliott; Arcangelo Liso; Achille Ambrosetti; Alessandro Pulsoni; Francesco Forconi; Livio Trentin; Gianpietro Semenzato; Giorgio Inghirami; Monia Capponi; Francesco Di Raimondo; Caterina Patti; Luca Arcaini; Pellegrino Musto; Stefano Pileri; Claudia Haferlach; Susanne Schnittger; Giovanni Pizzolo; Robin Foà; Laurent Farinelli; Torsten Haferlach; Laura Pasqualucci; Raul Rabadan; Brunangelo Falini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Investigation of the BRAF V600E mutation by pyrosequencing in lymphoproliferative disorders.

Authors:  Javier A Laurini; Patricia Aoun; Javeed Iqbal; Wing Chan; Timothy C Greiner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Dissecting therapeutic resistance to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic profiling.

Authors:  Nikhil Wagle; Caroline Emery; Michael F Berger; Matthew J Davis; Allison Sawyer; Panisa Pochanard; Sarah M Kehoe; Cory M Johannessen; Laura E Macconaill; William C Hahn; Matthew Meyerson; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Molecular variant of hairy cell leukemia with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Evgeny Arons; Robert J Kreitman
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2011-06

Review 7.  ARID1A mutations in cancer: another epigenetic tumor suppressor?

Authors:  Jennifer N Wu; Charles W M Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Novel MEK1 mutation identified by mutational analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway genes in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jenifer L Marks; Yixuan Gong; Dhananjay Chitale; Ben Golas; Michael D McLellan; Yumi Kasai; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; David Solit; Ross Levine; Kathrin Michel; Roman K Thomas; Valerie W Rusch; Marc Ladanyi; William Pao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  MEK1 mutations confer resistance to MEK and B-RAF inhibition.

Authors:  Caroline M Emery; Krishna G Vijayendran; Marie C Zipser; Allison M Sawyer; Lili Niu; Jessica J Kim; Charles Hatton; Rajiv Chopra; Patrick A Oberholzer; Maria B Karpova; Laura E MacConaill; Jianming Zhang; Nathanael S Gray; William R Sellers; Reinhard Dummer; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  VH4-34+ hairy cell leukemia, a new variant with poor prognosis despite standard therapy.

Authors:  Evgeny Arons; Tara Suntum; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Robert J Kreitman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  85 in total

1.  Langerhans cell histiocytosis associated with lymphoma: an incidental finding that is not associated with BRAF or MAP2K1 mutations.

Authors:  Sergio Pina-Oviedo; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Shaoying Li; Joseph D Khoury; Keyur P Patel; Khaled Alayed; R Craig Cason; Christopher J Bowman; C Cameron Yin
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Whole Exome Profiling of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia.

Authors:  Anat Galor; Carol L Karp; David Sant; Madhura Joag; Nabeel Shalabi; Christopher B Gustafson; Gaofeng Wang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 3.  Hairy cell leukemia: present and future directions.

Authors:  Robert J Kreitman
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-05-09

Review 4.  Ontogeny, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Classification of B- and T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Russell James Hubbard Ryan; Ryan Alan Wilcox
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.722

5.  Treatment outcomes and secondary cancer incidence in young patients with hairy cell leukaemia.

Authors:  Bartlomiej M Getta; Kaitlin M Woo; Sean Devlin; Jae H Park; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Alan Saven; Kanti Rai; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 6.  Hairy cell leukemia: update and current therapeutic approach.

Authors:  Latif Salam; Omar Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.284

Review 7.  Splicing Factor Mutations in Myelodysplasias: Insights from Spliceosome Structures.

Authors:  Jermaine L Jenkins; Clara L Kielkopf
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 8.  Hairy Cell Leukaemia.

Authors:  Matthew Cross; Claire Dearden
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Update on the biology and treatment options for hairy cell leukemia.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Naveen Pemmaraju; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-06

Review 10.  Hairy cell leukemia: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Bartlomiej M Getta; Jae H Park; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.