Literature DB >> 24241029

The ecology of mercury-resistant bacteria in Chesapeake Bay.

J D Nelson1, R R Colwell.   

Abstract

Total ambient mercury concentrations and numbers of mercury resistant, aerobic heterotrophic bacteria at six locations in Chesapeake Bay were monitored over a 17 month period. Mercury resistance expressed as the proportion of the total, viable, aerobic, heterotrophic bacterial population reached a reproducible maximum in spring and was positively correlated with dissolved oxygen concentration and sediment mercury concentration and negatively correlated with water turbidity. A relationship between mercury resistance and metabolic capability for reduction of mercuric ion to the metallic state was established by surveying a number of HgCl2-resistant cultures. The reaction was also observed in microrganisms isolated by differential centrifugation of water and sediment samples. Mercuric ion exhibited an average half-life of 12.5 days in the presence of approximately 10(5) organisms/ml. Cultures resistant to 6 ppm of mercuric chloride and 3 ppm of phenylmercuric acetate (PMA) were classified into eight generic categories.Pseudomonas spp. were the most numerous of those bacteria capable of metabolizing both compounds; however, PMA was more toxic and was more selective forPseudomonas. The mercury-resistant generic distribution was distinct from that of the total bacterial generic distribution and differed significantly between water and sediment, positionally and seasonally. The proportion of nonglucose-utilizing mercury-resistantPsuedomonas spp. was found to be positively correlated with total bacterial mercury resistance. It is concluded from this study that numbers of mercury-resistant bacteria as established by plate count can serve as a valid index ofin situ Hg(2+) metabolism.

Entities:  

Year:  1974        PMID: 24241029     DOI: 10.1007/BF02512389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  18 in total

1.  VOLATILIZATION OF MERCURY BY BACTERIA.

Authors:  L MAGOS; A A TUFFERY; T W CLARKSON
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1964-10

2.  Degradation of methylmercury by bacteria isolated from environmental samples.

Authors:  W J Spangler; J L Spigarelli; J M Rose; R S Flippin; H H Miller
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-04

3.  Mechanism of mercuric chloride resistance in microorganisms. II. NADPH-dependent reduction of mercuric chloride and vaporization of mercury from mercuric chloride by a multiple drug resistant strain of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  I Komura; T Funaba; K Izaki
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  Microflora of soil as viewed by freeze-etching.

Authors:  D L Balkwill; L E Casida
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Volatilization of mercuric chloride by mercury-resistant plasmid-bearing strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  A O Summers; E Lewis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Biochemical model for the biological methylation of mercury suggested from methylation studies in vivo with Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  L Landner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-04-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Determination of methylmercury compounds in foodstuffs. I. Methylmercury compounds in fish, identification and determination.

Authors:  G Westöö
Journal:  Acta Chem Scand       Date:  1966

8.  Biodegradation of phenylmercuric acetate by mercury-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  J D Nelson; W Blair; F E Brinckman; R R Colwell; W P Iverson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-09

9.  Mercury-resistant bacteria and petroleum degradation.

Authors:  J D Walker; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-01

10.  SENSITIVITY OF MIXED POPULATIONS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND ESCHERICHIA COLI TO MERCURIALS.

Authors:  F J STUTZENBERGER; E O BENNETT
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1965-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of ingesting mercury-containing bacteria on mercury tolerance and growth rates of ciliates.

Authors:  S G Berk; A L Mills; D L Hendricks; R R Colwell
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Influence of extracellular polysaccharides on the toxicity of copper and cadmium towardKlebsiella aerogenes.

Authors:  G Bitton; V Freihofer
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Composition of the saprophytic bacterial communities in freshwater systems contaminated by heavy metals.

Authors:  C Houba; J Remacle
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Acclimation of aquatic microbial communities to Hg(II) and CH3Hg (+) in polluted freshwater ponds.

Authors:  C A Liebert; T Barkay; R R Turner
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  The relationships of Hg(II) volatilization from a freshwater pond to the abundance ofmer genes in the gene pool of the indigenous microbial community.

Authors:  T Barkay; R R Turner; A Vandenbrook; C Liebert
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Microbiological effects of metal ions in Chesapeake Bay water and sediment.

Authors:  A L Mills; R R Colwell
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Volatilization of fluorescein mercuric acetate by marine bacteria from Minamata Bay.

Authors:  K Nakamura
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Mercury-resistance and mercuric reductase activity in Chromobacterium, Erwinia, and Bacillus species.

Authors:  J T Trevors
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Translocation of mercury and microbial adaptation in a model aquatic system.

Authors:  J A Titus; J E Parsons; R M Pfister
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.151

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.