Literature DB >> 24240743

A comparison between the full diallel cross and the simplified triple-test cross.

W E Crusio1, J H van Abeelen.   

Abstract

The simplified triple-test cross (sTTC) is a mating design that, because of its economic use of the experimental material as compared with other designs, seems very attractive. In theory, its power is almost equal to that of more elaborate designs such as the diallel cross. To evaluate the merits of both designs in a genetic analysis of mouse behavior, the results of a previous replicated 4×4 diallel cross (Crusio and van Abeelen 1986) were reanalyzed as a sTTC. We found that, at least with the fairly low number of strains employed, the sTTC analysis is clearly inferior to the diallel cross. This finding, in combination with some theoretical considerations, leads to the conclusion that the sTTC design is not a very useful one for such studies.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 24240743     DOI: 10.1007/BF00273714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of different diallel analyses.

Authors:  O Singh; R S Paroda
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis.

Authors:  M Singh; R K Singh
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  The consequences of using inadequate testers in the simplified triple test-cross.

Authors:  D S Virk; J L Jinks
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Applications of a simplified triple-test cross.

Authors:  D W Fulker
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1972 Jun-Sep       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits.

Authors:  M J Kearsey; J L Jinks
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  The replicated diallel cross: a generalized method of analysis.

Authors:  W E Crusio; J M Kerbusch; J H van Abeelen
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  The genetic architecture of behavioural responses to novelty in mice.

Authors:  W E Crusio; J H van Abeelen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.821

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.