Literature DB >> 24239829

Field dissipation and risk assessment of typical personal care products TCC, TCS, AHTN and HHCB in biosolid-amended soils.

Feng Chen1, Guang-Guo Ying2, Yi-Bing Ma3, Zhi-Feng Chen4, Hua-Jie Lai4, Feng-Jiao Peng4.   

Abstract

The antimicrobial agents triclocarban (TCC) and triclosan (TCS) and synthetic musks AHTN (Tonalide) and HHCB (Galaxolide) are widely used in many personal care products. These compounds may release into the soil environment through biosolid application to agricultural land and potentially affect soil organisms. This paper aimed to investigate accumulation, dissipation and potential risks of TCC, TCS, AHTN and HHCB in biosolid-amended soils of the three field trial sites (Zhejiang, Hunan and Shandong) with three treatments (CK: control without biosolid application, T1: single biosolid application, T2: repeated biosolid application every year). The one-year monitoring results showed that biosolids application could lead to accumulation of these four chemicals in the biosolid-amended soils, with the residual concentrations in the following order: TCC>TCS>AHTN>HHCB. Dissipation of TCC, TCS, AHTN and HHCB in the biosolid-amended soils followed the first-order kinetics model. Half-lives for TCC, TCS, AHTN and HHCB under the field conditions of Shandong site were 191, 258, 336 and 900 days for T1, and 51, 106, 159 and 83 days for T2, respectively. Repeated applications of biosolid led to accumulation of these personal care products and result in higher ecological risks. Based on the residual levels in the trial sites and limited toxicity data, high risks to soil organisms are expected for TCC and TCS, while low-medium risks for AHTN and HHCB.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accumulation; Biosolid; Dissipation; Personal care products; Risk; Soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239829     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Occurrence and removal of triclosan in Canadian wastewater systems.

Authors:  Paula Guerra; Steven Teslic; Ariba Shah; Amber Albert; Sarah B Gewurtz; Shirley Anne Smyth
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Occurrence and Fate of Triclosan and Triclocarban in Selected Wastewater Systems across Durban Metropolis, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Babatunde Femi Bakare; Gbadebo Clement Adeyinka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Fate of triclocarban in agricultural soils after biosolid applications.

Authors:  Nuria Lozano; Clifford P Rice; Mark Ramirez; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Biochemical and life cycle effects of triclosan chronic toxicity to earthworm Eisenia fetida.

Authors:  Jurate Zaltauskaite; Diana Miskelyte
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  A Review on the Fate of Legacy and Alternative Antimicrobials and Their Metabolites during Wastewater and Sludge Treatment.

Authors:  Timothy Abbott; Gokce Kor-Bicakci; Mohammad S Islam; Cigdem Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Simultaneous determination of 11 antiseptic ingredients in surface water based on polypyrrole decorated magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mengyan Zhang; Kaoqi Lian; Lianfeng Ai; Weijun Kang; Tangjuan Zhao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 7.  The Different Facets of Triclocarban: A Review.

Authors:  Domenico Iacopetta; Alessia Catalano; Jessica Ceramella; Carmela Saturnino; Lara Salvagno; Ileana Ielo; Dario Drommi; Elisabetta Scali; Maria Rosaria Plutino; Giuseppe Rosace; Maria Stefania Sinicropi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.