Literature DB >> 24239802

Back pain's association with vertebral end-plate signal changes in sciatica.

Abdelilah el Barzouhi1, Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp2, Bas F van der Kallen3, Geert J Lycklama à Nijeholt3, Wilbert B van den Hout4, Bart W Koes5, Wilco C Peul6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with sciatica frequently experience disabling back pain. One of the proposed causes for back pain is vertebral end-plate signal changes (VESC) as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
PURPOSE: To report on VESC findings, changes of VESC findings over time, and the correlation between VESC and disabling back pain in patients with sciatica. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year of follow-up. PATIENTS SAMPLE: Patients with 6 to 12 weeks of sciatica who participated in a multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing an early surgery strategy with prolonged conservative care with surgery if needed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were assessed by means of the 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain (with 0 representing no pain and 100 the worst pain ever experienced) at baseline and 1 year. Disabling back pain was defined as a VAS score of at least 40 mm.
METHODS: Patients underwent MRI both at baseline and after 1 year follow-up. Presence and change of VESC was correlated with disabling back pain using chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: At baseline, 39% of patients had disabling back pain. Of the patients with VESC at baseline, 40% had disabling back pain compared with 38% of the patients with no VESC (p=.67). The prevalence of type 1 VESC increased from 1% at baseline to 35% 1 year later in the surgical group compared with an increase from 3% to 11% in the conservative group. The prevalence of type 2 VESC decreased from 40% to 29% in the surgical group while remaining almost stable in the conservative group at 41%. The prevalence of disabling back pain at 1 year was 12% in patients with no VESC at 1 year, 16% in patients with type 1 VESC, 11% in patients with type 2 VESC, and 3% in patients with both types 1 and 2 VESC (p=.36). Undergoing surgery was associated with increase in the extent of VESC (odds ratio [OR], 8.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-15.7; p<.001). Patients who showed an increase in the extent of VESC after 1 year did not significantly report more disabling back pain compared with patients who did not show any increase (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.6; p=.61).
CONCLUSION: In this study, undergoing surgery for sciatica was highly associated with the development of VESC after 1 year. However, in contrast with the intuitive feeling of spine specialists, those with and those without VESC reported disabling back pain in nearly the same proportion. Therefore, VESC does not seem to be responsible for disabling back pain in patients with sciatica.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservative treatment; Low back pain; Sciatica; Surgery; Vertebral end-plate signal changes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239802     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  12 in total

1.  Association between types of Modic changes in the lumbar region and low back pain in a large cohort: the Wakayama spine study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Mera; Masatoshi Teraguchi; Hiroshi Hashizume; Hiroyuki Oka; Shigeyuki Muraki; Toru Akune; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Hidenobu Tamai; Sakae Tanaka; Munehito Yoshida; Noriko Yoshimura; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Aske Foldbjerg Laustsen; Rachid Bech-Azeddine
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Modic changes - An evidence-based, narrative review on its patho-physiology, clinical significance and role in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan; Ajoy Prasad Shetty; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-18

4.  The effects of lumbar fusion and non-fusion surgery on the development of Modic changes.

Authors:  Xiaoping Mu; Seong Woong Kim; Eberhard Uhl; Karsten Schöller
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.677

Review 5.  Novel diagnostic and prognostic methods for disc degeneration and low back pain.

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Ari Borthakur; Inna Belfer; Cora Bow; Jeffrey C Lotz; Hai-Qiang Wang; Kenneth M C Cheung; Eugene Carragee; Jaro Karppinen
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Association between changes in lumbar Modic changes and low back symptoms over a two-year period.

Authors:  Jyri Järvinen; Jaro Karppinen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Marianne Haapea; Mats Grönblad; Katariina Luoma; Eeva Rinne
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Acupuncture and Neural Mechanism in the Management of Low Back Pain-An Update.

Authors:  Tiaw-Kee Lim; Yan Ma; Frederic Berger; Gerhard Litscher
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-25

8.  Lumbar disc extrusions reduce faster than bulging discs due to an active role of macrophages in sciatica.

Authors:  N Djuric; X Yang; A El Barzouhi; R Ostelo; S G van Duinen; G J Lycklama À Nijeholt; B F W van der Kallen; W C Peul; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Peter Muhareb Udby; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Tom Bendix; Stig Brorson; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-12

10.  Refined Phenotyping of Modic Changes: Imaging Biomarkers of Prolonged Severe Low Back Pain and Disability.

Authors:  Juhani H Määttä; Jaro Karppinen; Markus Paananen; Cora Bow; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.