Literature DB >> 24239451

Changes in vertebral artery blood flow following various head positions and cervical spine manipulation.

Jairus J Quesnele1, John J Triano2, Michael D Noseworthy3, Greg D Wells4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the cerebrovascular hemodynamic response of cervical spine positions including rotation and cervical spine manipulation in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging technology on the vertebral artery (VA).
METHODS: This pilot study was conducted as a blinded examiner cohort with 4 randomized clinical tasks. Ten healthy male participants aged 24 to 30 years (mean, 26.8 years) volunteered to participate in the study. None of the participants had a history of disabling neck, arm, or headache pain within the last 6 months. They did not have any current or history of neurologic symptoms. In a neutral head position, physiologic measures of VA blood flow and velocity at the C1-2 spinal level were obtained using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging after 3 different head positions and a chiropractic upper cervical spinal manipulation. A total of 30 flow-encoded phase-contrast images were collected over the cardiac cycle, in each of the 4 conditions, and were used to provide a blood flow profile for one complete cardiac cycle. Differences between flow (in milliliters per second) and velocity (in centimeters per second) variables were evaluated using repeated-measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: The side-to-side difference between ipsilateral and contralateral VA velocities was not significant for either velocities (P = .14) or flows (P = .19) throughout the conditions. There were no other interactions or trends toward a difference for any of the other blood flow or velocity variables.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant changes in blood flow or velocity in the vertebral arteries of healthy young male adults after various head positions and cervical spine manipulations.
© 2014. Published by National University of Health Sciences All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood Flow Velocity; Chiropractic; Head Movements; Hemodynamic; Manipulation Spinal; Vertebral Artery; Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24239451     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Approach to cervicogenic dizziness: a comprehensive review of its aetiopathology and management.

Authors:  K Devaraja
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James R Dunning; Raymond Butts; Firas Mourad; Ian Young; Cesar Fernandez-de-Las Peñas; Marshall Hagins; Thomas Stanislawski; Jonathan Donley; Dustin Buck; Todd R Hooks; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Core and Complementary Chiropractic: Lowering Barriers to Patient Utilization of Services.

Authors:  John J Triano; Marion McGregor
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2016-09-15

4.  Effects of Cervical Rotatory Manipulation (CRM) on Carotid Atherosclerosis Plaque in Vulnerability: A Histological and Immunohistochemical Study Using Animal Model.

Authors:  Ji Qi; Ruiyue Ping; Shaoqun Zhang; Yanxiao Xu; Kai Wu; Yikai Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Effect of cervical manipulation on vertebral artery and cerebral haemodynamics in patients with chronic neck pain: a crossover randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicholas Moser; Silvano Mior; Michael Noseworthy; Pierre Côté; Greg Wells; Michael Behr; John Triano
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Proposing a new algorithm for premanipulative testing in physical therapy practice.

Authors:  Brent Harper; Daniel Miner; Harrison Vaughan
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2020-11-11

7.  A risk-benefit assessment strategy to exclude cervical artery dissection in spinal manual-therapy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Aleksander Chaibi; Michael Bjørn Russell
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.709

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.