E M Gårdebjer1, J S M Cuffe1, M Pantaleon1, M E Wlodek2, K M Moritz3. 1. School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. 2. The Department of Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. 3. School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia. Electronic address: k.moritz@uq.edu.au.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Alcohol consumption is a common social practice among women of childbearing age. With 50% of pregnancies being unplanned, many embryos are exposed to alcohol prior to pregnancy recognition and formation of the placenta. The effects of periconceptional (PC) alcohol exposure on the placenta are unknown. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to alcohol (12.5% v/v ad libitum) from 4 days prior to 4 days after conception and effects on placental growth, morphology and gene/protein expression examined at embryonic day (E) 20. RESULTS: PC ethanol (EtOH)-exposed fetuses were growth restricted and their placental/body weight ratio and placental cross-sectional area were increased. This was associated with an increase in cross-sectional area of the junctional zone and glycogen cells, especially in PC EtOH-exposed placentas from female fetuses. Junctional Glut1 and Igf2 mRNA levels were increased. Labyrinth Igf1 mRNA levels were decreased in placentas from both sexes, but protein IGF1R levels were decreased in placentas from male fetuses only. Labyrinth mRNA levels of Slc38a2 were decreased and Vegfa were increased in placentas following PC EtOH-exposure but only placentas from female fetuses exhibited increased Kdr expression. Augmented expression of the protective enzyme 11βHsd2 was found in PC EtOH-exposed labyrinth. DISCUSSION: These observations are consistent with a stress response, apparent well beyond the period of EtOH-exposure and demonstrate that PC EtOH alters placental development in a sex specific manner. CONCLUSION: Public awareness should be increased to educate women about how excessive drinking even before falling pregnant may impact on placental development and fetal health.
INTRODUCTION:Alcohol consumption is a common social practice among women of childbearing age. With 50% of pregnancies being unplanned, many embryos are exposed to alcohol prior to pregnancy recognition and formation of the placenta. The effects of periconceptional (PC) alcohol exposure on the placenta are unknown. METHODS:Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to alcohol (12.5% v/v ad libitum) from 4 days prior to 4 days after conception and effects on placental growth, morphology and gene/protein expression examined at embryonic day (E) 20. RESULTS:PC ethanol (EtOH)-exposed fetuses were growth restricted and their placental/body weight ratio and placental cross-sectional area were increased. This was associated with an increase in cross-sectional area of the junctional zone and glycogen cells, especially in PC EtOH-exposed placentas from female fetuses. Junctional Glut1 and Igf2 mRNA levels were increased. Labyrinth Igf1 mRNA levels were decreased in placentas from both sexes, but protein IGF1R levels were decreased in placentas from male fetuses only. Labyrinth mRNA levels of Slc38a2 were decreased and Vegfa were increased in placentas following PC EtOH-exposure but only placentas from female fetuses exhibited increased Kdr expression. Augmented expression of the protective enzyme 11βHsd2 was found in PC EtOH-exposed labyrinth. DISCUSSION: These observations are consistent with a stress response, apparent well beyond the period of EtOH-exposure and demonstrate that PC EtOH alters placental development in a sex specific manner. CONCLUSION: Public awareness should be increased to educate women about how excessive drinking even before falling pregnant may impact on placental development and fetal health.
Authors: Yeukai T M Mangwiro; James S M Cuffe; Jessica F Briffa; Dayana Mahizir; Kristina Anevska; Andrew J Jefferies; Sogand Hosseini; Tania Romano; Karen M Moritz; Mary E Wlodek Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Jamie O Lo; Matthias C Schabel; Victoria H J Roberts; Xiaojie Wang; Katherine S Lewandowski; Kathleen A Grant; Antonio E Frias; Christopher D Kroenke Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Yeukai T M Mangwiro; James S M Cuffe; Dayana Mahizir; Kristina Anevska; Sogand Gravina; Tania Romano; Karen M Moritz; Jessica F Briffa; Mary E Wlodek Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: George C Patton; Craig A Olsson; Vegard Skirbekk; Richard Saffery; Mary E Wlodek; Peter S Azzopardi; Marcin Stonawski; Bruce Rasmussen; Elizabeth Spry; Kate Francis; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray; Andrew M Prentice; Nicola Reavley; Peter Sheehan; Kim Sweeny; Russell M Viner; Susan M Sawyer Journal: Nature Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Richard C Chang; William M Skiles; Sarah S Chronister; Haiqing Wang; Gabrielle I Sutton; Yudhishtar S Bedi; Matthew Snyder; Charles R Long; Michael C Golding Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: J S M Cuffe; S L Walton; R R Singh; J G Spiers; H Bielefeldt-Ohmann; L Wilkinson; M H Little; K M Moritz Journal: J Physiol Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 5.182