Subramaniam Jayanthi1, Michael T McCoy1, Billy Chen2, Jonathan P Britt2, Saїd Kourrich2, Hau-Jie Yau2, Bruce Ladenheim1, Irina N Krasnova1, Antonello Bonci2, Jean Lud Cadet3. 1. Molecular Neuropsychiatry Research Branch, US Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse/Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD. 2. Synaptic Plasticity Section, US Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse/Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD. 3. Molecular Neuropsychiatry Research Branch, US Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse/Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: jcadet@intra.nida.nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic methamphetamine (METH) exposure causes neuroadaptations at glutamatergic synapses. METHODS: To identify the METH-induced epigenetic underpinnings of these neuroadaptations, we injected increasing METH doses to rats for 2 weeks and measured striatal glutamate receptor expression. We then quantified the effects of METH exposure on histone acetylation. We also measured METH-induced changes in DNA methylation and DNA hydroxymethylation. RESULTS: Chronic METH decreased transcript and protein expression of GluA1 and GluA2 alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) and GluN1 N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. These changes were associated with altered electrophysiological glutamatergic responses in striatal neurons. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction revealed that METH decreased enrichment of acetylated histone H4 on GluA1, GluA2, and GluN1 promoters. Methamphetamine exposure also increased repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) corepressor 1, methylated CpG binding protein 2, and histone deacetylase 2 enrichment, but not of sirtuin 1 or sirtuin 2, onto GluA1 and GluA2 gene sequences. Moreover, METH caused interactions of REST corepressor 1 and methylated CpG binding protein 2 with histone deacetylase 2 and of REST with histone deacetylase 1. Surprisingly, methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and hydroxymethylated DNA immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction revealed METH-induced decreased enrichment of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at GluA1 and GluA2 promoter sequences. Importantly, the histone deacetylase inhibitor, valproic acid, blocked METH-induced decreased expression of AMPAR and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. Finally, valproic acid also attenuated METH-induced decrease H4K16Ac recruitment on AMPAR gene sequences. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that histone H4 hypoacetylation may be the main determinant of METH-induced decreased striatal glutamate receptor expression. Published by Society of Biological Psychiatry on behalf of Society of Biological Psychiatry.
BACKGROUND: Chronic methamphetamine (METH) exposure causes neuroadaptations at glutamatergic synapses. METHODS: To identify the METH-induced epigenetic underpinnings of these neuroadaptations, we injected increasing METH doses to rats for 2 weeks and measured striatal glutamate receptor expression. We then quantified the effects of METH exposure on histone acetylation. We also measured METH-induced changes in DNA methylation and DNA hydroxymethylation. RESULTS: Chronic METH decreased transcript and protein expression of GluA1 and GluA2 alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) and GluN1 N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. These changes were associated with altered electrophysiological glutamatergic responses in striatal neurons. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction revealed that METH decreased enrichment of acetylated histone H4 on GluA1, GluA2, and GluN1 promoters. Methamphetamine exposure also increased repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) corepressor 1, methylated CpG binding protein 2, and histone deacetylase 2 enrichment, but not of sirtuin 1 or sirtuin 2, onto GluA1 and GluA2 gene sequences. Moreover, METH caused interactions of REST corepressor 1 and methylated CpG binding protein 2 with histone deacetylase 2 and of REST with histone deacetylase 1. Surprisingly, methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and hydroxymethylated DNA immunoprecipitation-polymerase chain reaction revealed METH-induced decreased enrichment of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at GluA1 and GluA2 promoter sequences. Importantly, the histone deacetylase inhibitor, valproic acid, blocked METH-induced decreased expression of AMPAR and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits. Finally, valproic acid also attenuated METH-induced decrease H4K16Ac recruitment on AMPAR gene sequences. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that histone H4 hypoacetylation may be the main determinant of METH-induced decreased striatal glutamate receptor expression. Published by Society of Biological Psychiatry on behalf of Society of Biological Psychiatry.
Authors: Annemieke J M de Ruijter; Albert H van Gennip; Huib N Caron; Stephan Kemp; André B P van Kuilenburg Journal: Biochem J Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Ji-Song Guan; Stephen J Haggarty; Emanuela Giacometti; Jan-Hermen Dannenberg; Nadine Joseph; Jun Gao; Thomas J F Nieland; Ying Zhou; Xinyu Wang; Ralph Mazitschek; James E Bradner; Ronald A DePinho; Rudolf Jaenisch; Li-Huei Tsai Journal: Nature Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Johannes Gräff; Damien Rei; Ji-Song Guan; Wen-Yuan Wang; Jinsoo Seo; Krista M Hennig; Thomas J F Nieland; Daniel M Fass; Patricia F Kao; Martin Kahn; Susan C Su; Alireza Samiei; Nadine Joseph; Stephen J Haggarty; Ivana Delalle; Li-Huei Tsai Journal: Nature Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Katherine N Wright; Fiona Hollis; Florian Duclot; Amanda M Dossat; Caroline E Strong; T Chase Francis; Roger Mercer; Jian Feng; David M Dietz; Mary Kay Lobo; Eric J Nestler; Mohamed Kabbaj Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: B M Siemsen; C M Reichel; K C Leong; C Garcia-Keller; C D Gipson; S Spencer; J A McFaddin; K N Hooker; P W Kalivas; M D Scofield Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Jarrod P Meadows; Mikael C Guzman-Karlsson; Scott Phillips; Cassie Holleman; Jessica L Posey; Jeremy J Day; John J Hablitz; J David Sweatt Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Anantha Ram Nookala; Daniel C Schwartz; Nitish S Chaudhari; Alexy Glazyrin; Edward B Stephens; Nancy E J Berman; Anil Kumar Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 7.217