Literature DB >> 24238828

Endoscopy-assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a single segment.

Yun-Tao Wang1, Xiao-Tao Wu2, Hui Chen2, Chen Wang2.   

Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been routinely performed for the treatment of lumbar segmental lesions. However, traditional PLIF procedures can result in a variety of approach-related morbidities. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of endoscopy-assisted PLIF in lumbar arthrodesis. From July 2005 to May 2007, a total of 56 patients underwent PLIF, including 24 endoscopy-assisted operations (endoscopic group) and 32 traditional open operations (open group). The perioperative data, clinical outcomes and radiographic results were compared. The intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, intraoperative and postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion volumes, values for C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate on postoperative day 3 and postoperative hospitalization days were decreased in the endoscopic group (p<0.05), while the operative time was longer than that of the open group (p=0.026). According to the Visual Analog Scale for pain, the postoperative low back pain score in the endoscopic group was lower than that observed in the open group (p<0.05). In the endoscopic group, the excellent and good outcome rate was 87.5%, the incidence of complications was 8.3%, and the intervertebral fusion rate was 100%. There were no significant differences for these outcomes when compared with the open group (p>0.05). Endoscopy-assisted PLIF can achieve a clinical efficacy similar to that of traditional open operations while minimizing destruction to adjacent tissues. This technique is safe and is characterized by less bleeding, less tissue trauma, decreased postoperative pain, rapid recovery, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic spinal surgery; Interbody fusion; Lumbar

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24238828     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.04.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  5 in total

1.  Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF): technical note.

Authors:  Myung Soo Youn; Jong Ki Shin; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Hayashi; Hideki Murakami; Satoru Demura; Satoshi Kato; Norio Kawahara; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note and Preliminary Clinical Experience with 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Junlong Wu; Huan Liu; Shengxiang Ao; Wenjie Zheng; Changqing Li; Haiyin Li; Yong Pan; Chao Zhang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Microendoscope-Assisted Versus Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Masayoshi Fukushima; Nozomu Ohtomo; Michita Noma; Yudai Kumanomido; Hiroyuki Nakarai; Keiichiro Tozawa; Yuichi Yoshida; Ryuji Sakamoto; Junya Miyahara; Masato Anno; Naohiro Kawamura; Akiro Higashikawa; Yujiro Takeshita; Hirohiko Inanami; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Qi Han; Feifan Meng; Ming Chen; Xiangjun Lu; Deyuan Zhao; Dongze Wu; Tingting Wang; Rujie Qin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.832

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.