K A Moore1, P J Ford2, C S Farah3. 1. School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, 200 Turbot Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Building 71/918, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia. Electronic address: kelsey.moore@uqconnect.edu.au. 2. School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, 200 Turbot Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia. 3. School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, 200 Turbot Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Building 71/918, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment disrupts quality of life and is associated with individualised supportive care needs. This study aimed to describe the support needs that affected the QoL of HNC patients, and to describe how patients coped with unmet support needs. METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were held with 8 participants previously treated for HNC. Participants were identified through snowball and convenience sampling methods. Interview data was analysed using content analysis (CA). Inductive CA was used to describe support needs and directed CA was guided by the stress appraisal and coping model to describe coping with unmet support needs. RESULTS: Support needs that affected QoL related to acute needs while undergoing treatment and support in coping with permanent treatment side effects. Coping with psychological stressors (i.e. depression and anxiety) affected QoL in the first six to twelve months following treatment. Coping was influenced by loss of access to the supportive hospital environment after treatment, and resulted in feelings of isolation post treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HNC patients drew support from professional and personal networks while undergoing treatment and post treatment. Patients described difficulties in coping with the side effects of treatment and accessing supportive care when away from the hospital setting. The transactional model of stress, appraisal and coping is useful in understanding the psychosocial outcomes of head and neck cancer; however conclusions from this study are limited by a small and homogenous sample.
PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment disrupts quality of life and is associated with individualised supportive care needs. This study aimed to describe the support needs that affected the QoL of HNC patients, and to describe how patients coped with unmet support needs. METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were held with 8 participants previously treated for HNC. Participants were identified through snowball and convenience sampling methods. Interview data was analysed using content analysis (CA). Inductive CA was used to describe support needs and directed CA was guided by the stress appraisal and coping model to describe coping with unmet support needs. RESULTS: Support needs that affected QoL related to acute needs while undergoing treatment and support in coping with permanent treatment side effects. Coping with psychological stressors (i.e. depression and anxiety) affected QoL in the first six to twelve months following treatment. Coping was influenced by loss of access to the supportive hospital environment after treatment, and resulted in feelings of isolation post treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HNC patients drew support from professional and personal networks while undergoing treatment and post treatment. Patients described difficulties in coping with the side effects of treatment and accessing supportive care when away from the hospital setting. The transactional model of stress, appraisal and coping is useful in understanding the psychosocial outcomes of head and neck cancer; however conclusions from this study are limited by a small and homogenous sample.
Authors: Marianne Boll Kristensen; Tina Broby Mikkelsen; Anne Marie Beck; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Irene Wessel; Karin B Dieperink Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: J Keszte; H Danker; A Dietz; E Meister; F Pabst; O Guntinas-Lichius; J Oeken; S Singer; A Meyer Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-10-15 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Christopher W Noel; Yue Jennifer Du; Elif Baran; David Forner; Zain Husain; Kevin M Higgins; Irene Karam; Kelvin K W Chan; Julie Hallet; Frances Wright; Natalie G Coburn; Antoine Eskander; Lesley Gotlib Conn Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 8.961
Authors: Marianne Boll Kristensen; Irene Wessel; Anne Marie Beck; Karin B Dieperink; Tina Broby Mikkelsen; Jens-Jakob Kjer Møller; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 5.717