Literature DB >> 24238479

Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States.

Elkin V Lemos1, Dongmu Zhang, Bradley J Van Voorhis, X Henry Hu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to document cost that is associated with multiple births vs singleton births in the United States. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study that used a claims database. Women 19-45 years old with live-born infants from 2005-2010 were identified. Infant deliveries were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. The cost entailed all payment made by insurers and patients. For mothers, the cost included expenses from 27 weeks before delivery to 1 month after delivery. For infants, the cost contained all expenses until their first birthday. Adjusted cost was estimated by generalized linear models after adjustment for the potential confounding variables with a gamma distribution and a log link.
RESULTS: The analysis included 437,924 eligible deliveries. Of them, 97.02% were singletons; 2.85% were twins, and 0.13% was triplets or more. Women with multiple pregnancies had higher systemic and localized comorbidities compared with women with singleton pregnancies (P < .0001). Twins and triplets or more were more likely to have stayed in a neonatal intensive care unit than were singletons (P < .0001). On average, adjusted total all-cause health care cost was $21,458 (95% confidence interval [CI], $21,302-21,614) per delivery with singletons, $104,831 (95% CI, $103,402-106,280) with twins, and $407,199 (95% CI, $384,984-430,695) with triplets or more.
CONCLUSION: Pregnancies with the delivery of twins cost approximately 5 times as much when compared with singleton pregnancies; pregnancies with delivery of triplets or more cost nearly 20 times as much.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost; multiple pregnancy; triplets; twins

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24238479     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  23 in total

1.  Estimates of lifetime infertility from three states: the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Chris Fussman; Marie Bailey; Dana Bernson; Denise J Jamieson; Melissa Murray-Jordan; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Single vitrified blastocyst transfer maximizes liveborn children per embryo while minimizing preterm birth.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Matthew T Connell; Kevin S Richter; Christina I Ramirez; Eric D Levens; Alan H DeCherney; Robert J Stillman; Eric A Widra
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Guidance for elective single-embryo transfer should be applied to frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Melanie R Freeman; M Shaun Hinds; Kay G Howard; Julie M Howard; George A Hill
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Allison S Mneimneh; Kiran M Perkins; Denise J Jamieson; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate in triplet pregnancy: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  C A Combs; E Schuit; S N Caritis; A C Lim; T J Garite; K Maurel; D Rouse; E Thom; A T Tita; Bwj Mol
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers with blastocysts derived from different cell numbers on day 3: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Haibin Zhao; Hui Liu; Mei Li; Keliang Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Twin Births in Medicaid: Prevalence, Outcomes, Utilization, and Cost in Four States, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Embry M Howell; Paul Johnson; Caitlin Cross-Barnet
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.