Literature DB >> 24238444

Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular molars in a white population: a cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo.

Gianluca Plotino1, Luigi Tocci, Nicola M Grande, Luca Testarelli, Daniela Messineo, Mario Ciotti, Gary Glassman, Ferdinando D'ambrosio, Gianluca Gambarini.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to use cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to analyze root canal anatomy and symmetry of maxillary and mandibular first and second molar teeth of a white population.
METHODS: A total of 201 patients who required CBCT examinations as part of their dental diagnosis and treatment were enrolled in the present study. Overall, 596 healthy, untreated, well-developed maxillary and mandibular molar teeth (161 maxillary first molars, 157 maxillary second molars, 117 mandibular first molars, and 161 mandibular second molars) were examined by CBCT to establish the symmetry in root and canal anatomy between right and left sides in the same patient by evaluating the number of roots and root canals and the root canal configuration.
RESULTS: Three separate roots with 3 separate canals was the normal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Most mandibular first and second molars had 2 separate roots, and the majority had 3 canals. In the present study, first molars, both maxillary and mandibular, exhibited greater asymmetry than the second molars. Maxillary first molars were found to be symmetrical in 71.1% of patients, whereas maxillary second molars were symmetrical in 79.6%. The remaining 28.9% and 20.4% of patients, respectively, showed asymmetry. Around 30% of the mandibular first molars and 20% of the mandibular second molars showed asymmetry.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study reported a percentage of symmetry that varied from 70%-81%. These variations in symmetry should be taken in high consideration when treating 2 opposite molars in the same patient, because their anatomy may be different in up to 30% of the cases.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; mandibular molars; maxillary molars; root canal morphology; symmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24238444     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  36 in total

1.  C-shaped canals-prevalence and root canal configuration by cone beam computed tomography evaluation in first and second mandibular molars-a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Avi Shemesh; Avi Levin; Vered Katzenell; Joe Ben Itzhak; Oleg Levinson; Zini Avraham; Michael Solomonov
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molar teeth of an Indian population: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Ajinkya Mansing Pawar; Mansing Pawar; Anda Kfir; Shishir Singh; Prashant Salve; Bhagyashree Thakur; Prasanna Neelakantan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The MB3 canal in maxillary molars: a micro-CT study.

Authors:  Ronald Ordinola-Zapata; Jorge N R Martins; Hugo Plascencia; Marco A Versiani; Clovis M Bramante
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Three-dimensional imaging modalities in endodontics.

Authors:  Teresa Mao; Prasanna Neelakantan
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-09-17

5.  Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Gnanasekaran Felsypremila; Thilla Sekar Vinothkumar; Deivanayagam Kandaswamy
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

6.  Interrelationships in the Variability of Root Canal Anatomy among the Permanent Teeth: A Full-Mouth Approach by Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Paul Monsarrat; Bertrand Arcaute; Ove A Peters; Elisabeth Maury; Norbert Telmon; Marie Georgelin-Gurgel; Delphine Maret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessment of the number of root canals in the maxillary and mandibular molars: A radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Roopashri Rajesh Kashyap; Siri Parvathi Beedubail; Raghavendra Kini; Prasanna Kumar Rao
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

8.  Root and canal morphology of maxillary second molars by cone-beam computed tomography in a native Chinese population.

Authors:  Daming Wu; Guangdong Zhang; Ruizhen Liang; Guangchao Zhou; Younong Wu; Chao Sun; Wei Fan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Prevalence and Morphology of C-Shaped Canals: A CBCT Analysis in a Korean Population.

Authors:  Sung Eun Yang; Tae Yeon Lee; Kyung Jae Kim
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  Comparison of 4 and 6 weeks of rest period for repair of root resorption.

Authors:  Sneh A Mehta; Shailesh V Deshmukh; Ravindranath B Sable; Amol S Patil
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.