BACKGROUND: Because smoking has a profound impact on socioeconomic disparities in illness and death, it is crucial that vulnerable populations of smokers be targeted with treatment. The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that all patients be asked about their smoking at every visit and that smokers be given brief advice to quit and referred to treatment. PURPOSE: Initiatives to facilitate these practices include the 5A's (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) and Ask-Advise-Refer (AAR). Unfortunately, primary care referrals are low, and most smokers referred fail to enroll. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) approach to linking smokers with treatment in a large, safety net public healthcare system. DESIGN: The study design was a pair-matched group-randomized trial with two treatment arms. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ten safety net clinics in Houston TX. INTERVENTION: Clinics were randomized to AAC (n=5; intervention) or AAR (n=5; control). Licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) were trained to assess and record the smoking status of all patients at all visits in the electronic health record. Smokers were given brief advice to quit. In AAC, the names and phone numbers of smokers who agreed to be connected were sent electronically to the Texas quitline daily, and patients were proactively called by the quitline within 48 hours. In AAR, smokers were offered a quitline referral card and encouraged to call on their own. Data were collected between June 2010 and March 2012 and analyzed in 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was impact, defined here as the proportion of identified smokers that enrolled in treatment. RESULTS: The impact (proportion of identified smokers who enrolled in treatment) of AAC (14.7%) was significantly greater than the impact of AAR (0.5%), t(4)=14.61, p=0.0001, OR=32.10 (95% CI=16.60, 62.06). CONCLUSIONS: The AAC approach to aiding smoking cessation has tremendous potential to reduce tobacco-related health disparities.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Because smoking has a profound impact on socioeconomic disparities in illness and death, it is crucial that vulnerable populations of smokers be targeted with treatment. The U.S. Public Health Service recommends that all patients be asked about their smoking at every visit and that smokers be given brief advice to quit and referred to treatment. PURPOSE: Initiatives to facilitate these practices include the 5A's (ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange) and Ask-Advise-Refer (AAR). Unfortunately, primary care referrals are low, and most smokers referred fail to enroll. This study evaluated the efficacy of the Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC) approach to linking smokers with treatment in a large, safety net public healthcare system. DESIGN: The study design was a pair-matched group-randomized trial with two treatment arms. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Ten safety net clinics in Houston TX. INTERVENTION: Clinics were randomized to AAC (n=5; intervention) or AAR (n=5; control). Licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) were trained to assess and record the smoking status of all patients at all visits in the electronic health record. Smokers were given brief advice to quit. In AAC, the names and phone numbers of smokers who agreed to be connected were sent electronically to the Texas quitline daily, and patients were proactively called by the quitline within 48 hours. In AAR, smokers were offered a quitline referral card and encouraged to call on their own. Data were collected between June 2010 and March 2012 and analyzed in 2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was impact, defined here as the proportion of identified smokers that enrolled in treatment. RESULTS: The impact (proportion of identified smokers who enrolled in treatment) of AAC (14.7%) was significantly greater than the impact of AAR (0.5%), t(4)=14.61, p=0.0001, OR=32.10 (95% CI=16.60, 62.06). CONCLUSIONS: The AAC approach to aiding smoking cessation has tremendous potential to reduce tobacco-related health disparities.
Authors: Charles J Bentz; K Bruce Bayley; Kerry E Bonin; Lori Fleming; Jack F Hollis; Timothy McAfee Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: David W Wetter; Ludmila Cofta-Gunn; Rachel T Fouladi; Jennifer E Irvin; Patricia Daza; Carlos Mazas; Kelli Wright; Paul M Cinciripini; Ellen R Gritz Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Molly B Conroy; Nicola E Majchrzak; Caroline B Silverman; Yuchiao Chang; Susan Regan; Louise I Schneider; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karen Basen-Engquist; Catherine M Alfano; Melissa Maitin-Shepard; Cynthia A Thomson; Kathryn H Schmitz; Bernardine M Pinto; Kevin Stein; David S Zucker; Karen L Syrjala; Elizabeth Fallon; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Katharine A Amato; Mary E Reid; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Gary A Giovino; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Graham W Warren; Martin C Mahoney; Andrew J Hyland Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2018 Sep/Oct
Authors: Brian P Jenssen; Naveen Muthu; Mary Kate Kelly; Hilary Baca; Justine Shults; Robert W Grundmeier; Alexander G Fiks Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Eve Angeline Hood-Medland; Susan L Stewart; Hien Nguyen; Mark Avdalovic; Scott MacDonald; Shu-Hong Zhu; Antonio Mayoral; Elisa K Tong Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Susan A Flocke; Mary M Step; Elizabeth Antognoli; Peter J Lawson; Samantha Smith; Brigid Jackson; Sue Krejci; Theodore Parran; Sybil Marsh Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Karin Johnson; Leah Tuzzio; Anne Renz; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Michael Parchman Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657