Literature DB >> 24237881

Fusion-optimized intervals (FOI): a new method to achieve the narrowest QRS for optimization of the AV and VV intervals in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Elena Arbelo1, José María Tolosana, Emilce Trucco, Diego Penela, Roger Borràs, Adelina Doltra, David Andreu, Marta Aceña, Antonio Berruezo, Marta Sitges, Fadi Mansour, Angeles Castel, Mariona Matas, Josep Brugada, Lluís Mont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) intervals may improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response but is a complex task. Fusion with intrinsic conduction may increase the benefit of CRT. The aim was to describe fusion-optimized intervals (FOI), a new method of optimizing CRT based on QRS duration. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with preserved AV conduction who received CRT were prospectively included. The AV interval was optimized by searching the narrowest QRS obtained within the fusion band during left ventricular (LV) pacing. The VV interval was then adjusted, comparing QRS duration in simultaneous biventricular, LV preexcitation (-30 milliseconds), right ventricular (RV) preexcitation (-30 milliseconds) and LV-only pacing. A substudy in 31 patients evaluated the invasive LV +dP/dtmax . The best fusion-optimized AV interval was 136 ± 30 milliseconds during atrial sensing and 192 ± 35 milliseconds during atrial pacing. The best QRS was obtained with simultaneous biventricular pacing in 28 patients (37%), LV preexcitation in 22 (29%), LV-only in 20 (26%), and RV preexcitation in 6 (8%). Baseline QRS was shortened more by FOI (59 ± 19 milliseconds) than by nominal settings (40 ± 21 milliseconds; P < 0.001). Sixty-five patients (86%) showed >10% shortening of the baseline QRS with FOI; none prolonged the QRS duration by FOI compared to nominal settings. All echocardiographic asynchrony parameters were corrected by FOI. Baseline +dP/dtmax improvement was greater in FOI (127 ± 95 mmHg/seconds) than in nominal settings (102 ± 71 mmHg/seconds; P = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The FOI method is feasible, further reduces QRS duration, and improves acute hemodynamic response compared to nominal programming of CRT.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; electrocardiogram; fusion; optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24237881     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  12 in total

1.  Determinants of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  John D Allison; Yitschak Biton; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-05-15

2.  Determinants of LV dP/dtmax and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Hans Henrik Odland; Torbjørn Holm; Lars Ove Gammelsrud; Richard Cornelussen; Erik Kongsgaard
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-05

3.  Vectorcardiography for optimization of stimulation intervals in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Caroline J M van Deursen; Liliane Wecke; Wouter M van Everdingen; Marcus Ståhlberg; Michel H G Janssen; Frieder Braunschweig; Lennart Bergfeldt; Harry J G M Crijns; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Ventricular dyssynchrony assessment using ultra-high frequency ECG technique.

Authors:  Pavel Jurak; Josef Halamek; Jaroslav Meluzin; Filip Plesinger; Tereza Postranecka; Jolana Lipoldova; Miroslav Novak; Vlastimil Vondra; Ivo Viscor; Ladislav Soukup; Petr Klimes; Petr Vesely; Josef Sumbera; Karel Zeman; Roshini S Asirvatham; Jason Tri; Samuel J Asirvatham; Pavel Leinveber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Programming Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Electrical Synchrony: Reaching Beyond Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Activation Delay.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; David O'Donnell; Mohammed Bassiouny; Philippe Ritter; Carlo Pappone; Jan Mangual; Daniel Cantillon; Nima Badie; Bernard Thibault; Brian Wisnoskey
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: mechanisms of action and scope for further improvement in cardiac function.

Authors:  Siana Jones; Joost Lumens; S M Afzal Sohaib; Judith A Finegold; Prapa Kanagaratnam; Mark Tanner; Edward Duncan; Philip Moore; Francisco Leyva; Mike Frenneaux; Mark Mason; Alun D Hughes; Darrel P Francis; Zachary I Whinnett
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Impact of QRS morphology on response to conduction system pacing after atrioventricular junction ablation.

Authors:  Shengjie Wu; Mengxing Cai; Rujie Zheng; Songjie Wang; Limeng Jiang; Lei Xu; Ruiyu Shi; Fangyi Xiao; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Yongmei Cha; Lan Su; Weijian Huang
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging of dynamic atrioventricular delay programming in a patient with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Peter H Waddingham; Jan Mangual; Michele Orini; Nima Badie; Luke McSpadden; Pier D Lambiase; Anthony W C Chow
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-09-29

9.  Impact of synchronous atrioventricular delay optimization on left ventricle flow force angle evaluated by echocardiographic particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Valter Bianchi; Alfonso R Martiniello; Jan Mangual; Vincenzo Tavoletta; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Giovanni Tonti; Valentina Maria Caso; Pio Caso; Antonio D'Onofrio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Optimization of Chronic Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Fusion Pacing Algorithm Improves Echocardiographic Response.

Authors:  Ahmed AlTurki; Pedro Y Lima; Martin L Bernier; Daniel Garcia; Alejandro Vidal; Bruno Toscani; Sergio Diaz; Mauricio Montemezzo; Alaa Al-Dossari; Tomy Hadjis; Jacqueline Joza; Vidal Essebag
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.