Literature DB >> 24237662

A comparative study of clinical Aeromonas dhakensis and Aeromonas hydrophila isolates in southern Taiwan: A. dhakensis is more predominant and virulent.

P-L Chen1, C-J Wu, C-S Chen, P-J Tsai, H-J Tang, W-C Ko.   

Abstract

Aeromonas dhakensis, often phenotypically identified as Aeromonas hydrophila, is an important human pathogen. The present study aimed to compare the clinical and biological features of A. dhakensis and A. hydrophila isolates from human wounds. A total of 80 Aeromonas wound isolates collected between January 2004 and April 2011 were analysed. The species was identified by the DNA sequence matching of rpoD and gyrB (or rpoB if necessary). Most of the Aeromonas isolates were identified as A. dhakensis (37, 46.3%), and 13 (16.3%) as A. hydrophila. Both species alone can cause severe skin and soft-tissue infections. More A. dhakensis isolates were found in wounds exposed to environmental water (32.4% vs 0%, p 0.042). More biofilm formation was noted among A. dhakensis isolates (mean optical density at 570 nm, 1.23 ± 0.09 vs 0.78 ± 0.21, p 0.03). The MICs of ceftriaxone, imipenem and gentamicin for A. dhakensis isolates were higher (p <0.0001, <0.04, and <0.01, respectively). The survival rates of Caenorhabditis elegans co-incubated with A. dhakensis from day 1 to day 3 were lower than those of worms infected with A. hydrophila in liquid toxicity assays (all p values <0.01). Isolates of A. dhakensis exhibited more cytotoxicity, as measured by the released leucocyte lactate dehydrogenase levels in human normal skin fibroblast cell lines (29.6 ± 1.2% vs 20.6 ± 0.6%, p <0.0001). The cytotoxin gene ast was primarily present in A. hydrophila isolates (100% vs 2.7%, p <0.0001). In summary, A. dhakensis is the predominant species among Aeromonas wound isolates, and more virulent than A. hydrophila.
© 2013 The Authors Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2013 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aeromonas dhakensis; Aeromonas hydrophila; Caenorhabditis elegans; antimicrobial susceptibility; biofilm; cytotoxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24237662     DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  21 in total

1.  Aeromonas Isolates from Fish and Patients in Tainan City, Taiwan: Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics.

Authors:  Chi-Jung Wu; Wen-Chien Ko; Nan-Yao Lee; Shu-Li Su; Chia-Wen Li; Ming-Chi Li; Yi-Wei Chen; Yu-Cheng Su; Cing-Ying Shu; Yu-Tzu Lin; Po-Lin Chen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry can accurately differentiate Aeromonas dhakensis from A. hydrophila, A. caviae, and A. veronii.

Authors:  Po-Lin Chen; Tai-Fen Lee; Chi-Jung Wu; Shih-Hua Teng; Lee-Jene Teng; Wen-Chien Ko; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  What's in a Name? New Bacterial Species and Changes to Taxonomic Status from 2012 through 2015.

Authors:  Erik Munson; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Classification of Aeromonas spp. isolated from water and clinical sources and distribution of virulence genes.

Authors:  S Králová; E Staňková; I Sedláček
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Functional genomic characterization of virulence factors from necrotizing fasciitis-causing strains of Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Christopher J Grim; Elena V Kozlova; Duraisamy Ponnusamy; Eric C Fitts; Jian Sha; Michelle L Kirtley; Christina J van Lier; Bethany L Tiner; Tatiana E Erova; Sandeep J Joseph; Timothy D Read; Joshua R Shak; Sam W Joseph; Ed Singletary; Tracy Felland; Wallace B Baze; Amy J Horneman; Ashok K Chopra
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  A Disease Model of Muscle Necrosis Caused by Aeromonas dhakensis Infection in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Po-Lin Chen; Yi-Wei Chen; Chun-Chun Ou; Tzer-Min Lee; Chi-Jung Wu; Wen-Chien Ko; Chang-Shi Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Characterization of Lysozyme-Like Effector TseP Reveals the Dependence of Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) Secretion on Effectors in Aeromonas dhakensis Strain SSU.

Authors:  Xiaoye Liang; Tong-Tong Pei; Zeng-Hang Wang; Weiliang Xiong; Li-Li Wu; Ping Xu; Shuangjun Lin; Tao G Dong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Genetic relatedness and novel sequence types of clinical Aeromonas dhakensis from Malaysia.

Authors:  Tien Tien Vicky Lau; Jin-Ai Mary Anne Tan; S D Puthucheary; Suat-Moi Puah; Kek-Heng Chua
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  Clinical implications of species identification in monomicrobial Aeromonas bacteremia.

Authors:  Chi-Jung Wu; Po-Lin Chen; Po-Ren Hsueh; Ming-Chung Chang; Pei-Jane Tsai; Hsin-I Shih; Hsuan-Chen Wang; Pei-Hsin Chou; Wen-Chien Ko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case.

Authors:  Sophie M Colston; Matthew S Fullmer; Lidia Beka; Brigitte Lamy; J Peter Gogarten; Joerg Graf
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.