Literature DB >> 24237287

The quality of mental health information commonly searched for on the Internet.

John M Grohol1, Joseph Slimowicz, Rebecca Granda.   

Abstract

Previous research has reviewed the quality of online information related to specific mental disorders. Yet, no comprehensive study has been conducted on the overall quality of mental health information searched for online. This study examined the first 20 search results of two popular search engines-Google and Bing-for 11 common mental health terms. They were analyzed using the DISCERN instrument, an adaptation of the Depression Website Content Checklist (ADWCC), Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level readability measures, HONCode badge display, and commercial status, resulting in an analysis of 440 web pages. Quality of Web site results varied based on type of disorder examined, with higher quality Web sites found for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and dysthymia, and lower quality ratings for phobia, anxiety, and panic disorder Web sites. Of the total Web sites analyzed, 67.5% had good or better quality content. Nearly one-third of the search results produced Web sites from three entities: WebMD, Wikipedia, and the Mayo Clinic. The mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 41.21, and the mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level score was 11.68. The presence of the HONCode badge and noncommercial status was found to have a small correlation with Web site quality, and Web sites displaying the HONCode badge and commercial sites had lower readability scores. Popular search engines appear to offer generally reliable results pointing to mostly good or better quality mental health Web sites. However, additional work is needed to make these sites more readable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24237287     DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw        ISSN: 2152-2715


  18 in total

1.  The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Alsaiari; Abdulaziz Joury; Mossab Aljuaid; Mohammed Wazzan; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Patient-focused websites related to stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a DISCERN quality analysis.

Authors:  Omar Felipe Dueñas-Garcia; Padmasini Kandadai; Michael K Flynn; Danielle Patterson; Jyot Saini; Katharine O'Dell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Exploring Continuum and Categorical Conceptualisations of Mental Health and Mental Illness on Australian Websites: A Systematic Review and Content Analysis.

Authors:  Dominic K Fernandez; Saniya Singh; Frank P Deane; Stewart A Vella
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2022-08-22

4.  Health Literacy and Use and Trust in Health Information.

Authors:  Xuewei Chen; Jennifer L Hay; Erika A Waters; Marc T Kiviniemi; Caitlin Biddle; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Kimberly Kaphingst; Heather Orom
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-08-30

5.  The Quality of Internet Websites for People Experiencing Psychosis: Pilot Expert Assessment.

Authors:  Kay Wilhelm; Tonelle Handley; Catherine McHugh; David Lowenstein; Kristy Arrold
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  E-mental health care among young adults and help-seeking behaviors: a transversal study in a community sample.

Authors:  Nadia Younes; Aude Chollet; Estelle Menard; Maria Melchior
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Online information seeking by patients with bipolar disorder: results from an international multisite survey.

Authors:  Jörn Conell; Rita Bauer; Tasha Glenn; Martin Alda; Raffaella Ardau; Bernhard T Baune; Michael Berk; Yuly Bersudsky; Amy Bilderbeck; Alberto Bocchetta; Letizia Bossini; Angela Marianne Paredes Castro; Eric Yat Wo Cheung; Caterina Chillotti; Sabine Choppin; Maria Del Zompo; Rodrigo Dias; Seetal Dodd; Anne Duffy; Bruno Etain; Andrea Fagiolini; Julie Garnham; John Geddes; Jonas Gildebro; Ana Gonzalez-Pinto; Guy M Goodwin; Paul Grof; Hirohiko Harima; Stefanie Hassel; Chantal Henry; Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei; Vaisnvy Kapur; Girish Kunigiri; Beny Lafer; Chun Lam; Erik Roj Larsen; Ute Lewitzka; Rasmus Licht; Anne Hvenegaard Lund; Blazej Misiak; Patryk Piotrowski; Scott Monteith; Rodrigo Munoz; Takako Nakanotani; René E Nielsen; Claire O'Donovan; Yasushi Okamura; Yamima Osher; Andreas Reif; Philipp Ritter; Janusz K Rybakowski; Kemal Sagduyu; Brett Sawchuk; Elon Schwartz; Ângela Miranda Scippa; Claire Slaney; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Kirsi Suominen; Aleksandra Suwalska; Peter Tam; Yoshitaka Tatebayashi; Leonardo Tondo; Eduard Vieta; Maj Vinberg; Biju Viswanath; Julia Volkert; Mark Zetin; Iñaki Zorrilla; Peter C Whybrow; Michael Bauer
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 8.  Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Tasha Glenn; Scott Monteith; Rita Bauer; Peter C Whybrow; John Geddes
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2017-02-07

9.  Use of the Internet and Mobile Phones for Self-Management of Severe Mental Health Problems: Qualitative Study of Staff Views.

Authors:  Natalie Berry; Sandra Bucci; Fiona Lobban
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-11-01

10.  Clinical Practice Models for the Use of E-Mental Health Resources in Primary Health Care by Health Professionals and Peer Workers: A Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Julia Reynolds; Kathleen M Griffiths; John A Cunningham; Kylie Bennett; Anthony Bennett
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2015-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.