AIMS: Active targeted transport of the nanoformulated redox enzyme, catalase, in macrophages attenuates oxidative stress and as such increases survival of dopaminergic neurons in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Optimization of the drug formulation is crucial for the successful delivery in living cells. We demonstrated earlier that packaging of catalase into a polyion complex micelle ('nanozyme') with a synthetic polyelectrolyte block copolymer protected the enzyme against degradation in macrophages and improved therapeutic outcomes. We now report the manufacture of nanozymes with superior structure and therapeutic indices. METHODS: Synthesis, characterization and therapeutic efficacy of optimal cell-based nanoformulations are evaluated. RESULTS: A formulation design for drug carriers typically works to avoid entrapment in monocytes and macrophages focusing on small-sized nanoparticles with a polyethylene glycol corona (to provide a stealth effect). By contrast, the best nanozymes for delivery in macrophages reported in this study have a relatively large size (≈ 200 nm), which resulted in improved loading capacity and release from macrophages. Furthermore, the cross-linking of nanozymes with the excess of a nonbiodegradable linker ensured their low cytotoxicity, and efficient catalase protection in cell carriers. Finally, the 'alternatively activated' macrophage phenotype (M2) utilized in these studies did not promote further inflammation in the brain, resulting in a subtle but statistically significant effect on neuronal regeneration and repair in vivo. CONCLUSION: The optimized cross-linked nanozyme loaded into macrophages reduced neuroinflammatory responses and increased neuronal survival in mice. Importantly, the approach for nanoformulation design for cell-mediated delivery is different from the common requirements for injectable formulations.
AIMS: Active targeted transport of the nanoformulated redox enzyme, catalase, in macrophages attenuates oxidative stress and as such increases survival of dopaminergic neurons in animal models of Parkinson's disease. Optimization of the drug formulation is crucial for the successful delivery in living cells. We demonstrated earlier that packaging of catalase into a polyion complex micelle ('nanozyme') with a synthetic polyelectrolyte block copolymer protected the enzyme against degradation in macrophages and improved therapeutic outcomes. We now report the manufacture of nanozymes with superior structure and therapeutic indices. METHODS: Synthesis, characterization and therapeutic efficacy of optimal cell-based nanoformulations are evaluated. RESULTS: A formulation design for drug carriers typically works to avoid entrapment in monocytes and macrophages focusing on small-sized nanoparticles with a polyethylene glycol corona (to provide a stealth effect). By contrast, the best nanozymes for delivery in macrophages reported in this study have a relatively large size (≈ 200 nm), which resulted in improved loading capacity and release from macrophages. Furthermore, the cross-linking of nanozymes with the excess of a nonbiodegradable linker ensured their low cytotoxicity, and efficient catalase protection in cell carriers. Finally, the 'alternatively activated' macrophage phenotype (M2) utilized in these studies did not promote further inflammation in the brain, resulting in a subtle but statistically significant effect on neuronal regeneration and repair in vivo. CONCLUSION: The optimized cross-linked nanozyme loaded into macrophages reduced neuroinflammatory responses and increased neuronal survival in mice. Importantly, the approach for nanoformulation design for cell-mediated delivery is different from the common requirements for injectable formulations.
Entities:
Keywords:
blood–brain barrier; catalase; cell-mediated drug delivery; neuroinflammation
Authors: Du-Chu Wu; Peter Teismann; Kim Tieu; Miquel Vila; Vernice Jackson-Lewis; Harry Ischiropoulos; Serge Przedborski Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-04-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Huanyu Dou; Christopher J Destache; Justin R Morehead; R Lee Mosley; Michael D Boska; Jeffrey Kingsley; Santhi Gorantla; Larisa Poluektova; Jay A Nelson; Mahesh Chaubal; Jane Werling; James Kipp; Barrett E Rabinow; Howard E Gendelman Journal: Blood Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Elena V Batrakova; Serguei V Vinogradov; Sandra M Robinson; Michael L Niehoff; William A Banks; Alexander V Kabanov Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Elena V Batrakova; Shu Li; Ashley D Reynolds; R Lee Mosley; Tatiana K Bronich; Alexander V Kabanov; Howard E Gendelman Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Natalia L Klyachko; Roberta Polak; Matthew J Haney; Yuling Zhao; Reginaldo J Gomes Neto; Michael C Hill; Alexander V Kabanov; Robert E Cohen; Michael F Rubner; Elena V Batrakova Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2017-06-18 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Krupa Savalia; Devika S Manickam; Erin G Rosenbaugh; Jun Tian; Iman M Ahmad; Alexander V Kabanov; Matthew C Zimmerman Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 7.376