Literature DB >> 24237097

Lung cancer in Victoria: are we making progress?

Paul L R Mitchell1, Vicky J Thursfield, David L Ball, Gary E Richardson, Louis B Irving, Yvonne Torn-Broers, Graham G Giles, Gavin M Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify areas to improve patient management in lung cancer, which remains the greatest cause of death from cancer in Australia. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective survey of all cases of lung cancer reported to the Victorian Cancer Registry from 1 January to 30 June 2003 and followed up for 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and disease characteristics, investigations, staging, treatment, cause of death, survival.
RESULTS: 841 patients were included. Smoking data were available for 799, of whom 63 (7.9%) had never smoked. Of 655 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, 198 (30.2%) were treated with curative intent, 125 (19.1%) by surgery and 73 (11.1%) by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Only 7 (6.9%) of surgical patients with complete R0 resection had adjuvant chemotherapy. Of 101 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases, a third had limited stage disease which was mostly treated with curative intent by chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Patients whose cases were discussed at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) were significantly more likely to receive anticancer treatment and had longer survival; on multivariate analysis, MDM discussion was an independent prognostic factor. Compared with a similar survey 10 years earlier, the median age of patients diagnosed with lung cancer had increased by almost 3 years, the proportion of affected men decreased and adenocarcinoma was more frequent, while 10% of patients continued to have no pathologically confirmed diagnosis and 26% continued to receive no anticancer treatment. The number of patients with NSCLC who went on to a definitive surgical procedure fell with no detriment to survival, which likely reflected better staging with the introduction of positron emission tomography scanning.
CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities to improve patient management included increasing the proportion with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis and greater use of postsurgical adjuvant chemotherapy. A high proportion of patients received no treatment, with underuse of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Critically, the low rate of case discussions at MDMs needs to increase. However, effective strategies are required to identify cases early, as over two-thirds currently present with incurable disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24237097     DOI: 10.5694/mja13.10331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  12 in total

1.  Clinical quality registries: engaging effectiveness data for quality improvement.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Management of patients with early stage lung cancer - why do some patients not receive treatment with curative intent?

Authors:  Ross Lawrenson; Chunhuan Lao; Leonie Brown; Lucia Moosa; Lynne Chepulis; Rawiri Keenan; Jacquie Kidd; Karen Middleton; Paul Conaglen; Charles de Groot; Denise Aitken; Janice Wong
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Association of sarcopenia and observed physical performance with attainment of multidisciplinary team planned treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: an observational study protocol.

Authors:  Jemima T Collins; Simon Noble; John Chester; Helen E Davies; William D Evans; Jason Lester; Diane Parry; Rebecca J Pettit; Anthony Byrne
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Pathways to diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer: a descriptive cohort study.

Authors:  Stuart Purdie; Nicola Creighton; Kahren Maree White; Deborah Baker; Dan Ewald; Chee Khoon Lee; Alison Lyon; Johnathan Man; David Michail; Alexis Andrew Miller; Lawrence Tan; David Currow; Jane M Young
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.871

5.  Multidisciplinary team care in lung cancer.

Authors:  Emily Stone
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08

Review 6.  Improving outcomes in lung cancer: the value of the multidisciplinary health care team.

Authors:  Eve Denton; Matthew Conron
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-03-30

7.  The LEAD study protocol: a mixed-method cohort study evaluating the lung cancer diagnostic and pre-treatment pathways of patients from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) backgrounds compared to patients from Anglo-Australian backgrounds.

Authors:  Danielle Mazza; Xiaoping Lin; Fiona M Walter; Jane M Young; David J Barnes; Paul Mitchell; Bianca Brijnath; Andrew Martin; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linda M O'Keeffe; Gemma Taylor; Rachel R Huxley; Paul Mitchell; Mark Woodward; Sanne A E Peters
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  A review on the impact of lung cancer multidisciplinary care on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Monique Y Heinke; Shalini K Vinod
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08

Review 10.  Optimizing lung cancer MDT data for maximum clinical impact-a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Emily Stone; Nicole Rankin; David Currow; Kwun M Fong; Jane L Phillips; Tim Shaw
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.