BACKGROUND:Azathioprine (AZA), a pro-drug metabolised to the active metabolites 6-tioguanine nucleotides (6TGN), is a steroid-sparing therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). AIM: To investigate whether AZA therapy is optimised by individualised dosing based on thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity and 6TGN concentrations. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of weight-based vs. individualised AZA dosing in inducing and maintaining remission in adults and children with steroid-treated CD. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CR) at 16 weeks. In the weight-based arm, subjects received 2.5 mg/kg/day. In the individualised dosing arm, the initial AZA dose was 1.0 mg/kg/day (if intermediate TPMT) or 2.5 mg/kg/day (if normal TPMT). Starting at week 5, the dose was adjusted to target 6TGN concentrations of 250-400 pmol/8 × 10(8) red blood cells (RBC), or to a maximal dose of 4 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: After randomising 50 subjects, the trial was stopped prematurely due to insufficient enrolment. In intention-to-treat analysis, CR rates at week 16 were 40% in the individualised arm vs. 16% in the weight-based arm (P = 0.11). In per-protocol (PP) analysis, week 16 CR rates were 60% in the individualised arm and 25% in the weight-based arm (P = 0.12). At week 16, median 6TGN concentrations in PP remitters and nonremitters were 216 and 149 pmol/8 × 10(8) RBC respectively (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Despite trends favouring individualised over weight-based AZA dosing, there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy, likely due to low statistical power and inability to achieve the target 6TGN concentrations in the individualised arm. [Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier Nct00113503].
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Azathioprine (AZA), a pro-drug metabolised to the active metabolites 6-tioguanine nucleotides (6TGN), is a steroid-sparing therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). AIM: To investigate whether AZA therapy is optimised by individualised dosing based on thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity and 6TGN concentrations. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of weight-based vs. individualised AZA dosing in inducing and maintaining remission in adults and children with steroid-treated CD. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CR) at 16 weeks. In the weight-based arm, subjects received 2.5 mg/kg/day. In the individualised dosing arm, the initial AZA dose was 1.0 mg/kg/day (if intermediate TPMT) or 2.5 mg/kg/day (if normal TPMT). Starting at week 5, the dose was adjusted to target 6TGN concentrations of 250-400 pmol/8 × 10(8) red blood cells (RBC), or to a maximal dose of 4 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: After randomising 50 subjects, the trial was stopped prematurely due to insufficient enrolment. In intention-to-treat analysis, CR rates at week 16 were 40% in the individualised arm vs. 16% in the weight-based arm (P = 0.11). In per-protocol (PP) analysis, week 16 CR rates were 60% in the individualised arm and 25% in the weight-based arm (P = 0.12). At week 16, median 6TGN concentrations in PP remitters and nonremitters were 216 and 149 pmol/8 × 10(8) RBC respectively (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Despite trends favouring individualised over weight-based AZA dosing, there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy, likely due to low statistical power and inability to achieve the target 6TGN concentrations in the individualised arm. [Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier Nct00113503].
Authors: J F Colombel; N Ferrari; H Debuysere; P Marteau; J P Gendre; B Bonaz; J C Soulé; R Modigliani; Y Touze; P Catala; C Libersa; F Broly Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: A Dignass; G Van Assche; J O Lindsay; M Lémann; J Söderholm; J F Colombel; S Danese; A D'Hoore; M Gassull; F Gomollón; D W Hommes; P Michetti; C O'Morain; T Oresland; A Windsor; E F Stange; S P L Travis Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Marla C Dubinsky; Huiying Yang; Philip V Hassard; Ernest G Seidman; Lori Y Kam; Maria T Abreu; Stephan R Targan; Eric A Vasiliauskas Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Melissa L Haines; Yousef Ajlouni; Peter M Irving; Miles P Sparrow; Rosemary Rose; Richard B Gearry; Peter R Gibson Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Max Reinshagen; Ekkehard Schütz; Victor W Armstrong; Christoph Behrens; Christian von Tirpitz; Andreas Stallmach; Hans Herfarth; Jürgen Stein; Peter Bias; Guido Adler; Maria Shipkova; Wolfgang Kruis; Michael Oellerich; Nicolas von Ahsen Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne Journal: Gut Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Akbar K Waljee; Kay Sauder; Anand Patel; Sandeep Segar; Yiwei Zhang; Ji Zhu; Ryan W Stidham; Ulysses Balis; Peter D R Higgins Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Heimo H Wenzl; Christian Primas; Gottfried Novacek; Alexander Teml; Anna Öfferlbauer-Ernst; Christoph Högenauer; Harald Vogelsang; Wolfgang Petritsch; Walter Reinisch Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Hans H Herfarth; Susan Jackson; Barbara G Schliebe; Christopher Martin; Anastasia Ivanova; Kristen Anton; Robert S Sandler; Millie D Long; Kim L Isaacs; Mark T Osterman; Bruce E Sands; Peter D Higgins; James D Lewis Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.325