Literature DB >> 24237034

ICD lead parameters, performance, and adverse events following continuous-flow LVAD implantation.

Isac C Thomas1, David P Cork, Andrew Levy, Hemal Nayak, John F Beshai, Martin C Burke, Joshua D Moss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in the months following continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) implantation are common and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate for changes in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) performance following LVAD implantation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the ICD interrogation reports and medical records of patients who received a continuous-flow LVAD at the University of Chicago Medical Center between January 2008 and December 2010. Patients who did not have an ICD prior to LVAD implantation were excluded.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included. Median right ventricular lead sensing amplitude decreased from 10.0 (interquartile range 7.6-13.6) mV prior to LVAD to 7.9 (5.9-9.3) mV after LVAD implantation (P < 0.01). Significant reductions in sensing threshold were associated with smaller lead diameters, smaller pace/sense electrode surface areas, and Medtronic ICD leads (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Lead impedance and capture threshold did not change significantly. ICD-related adverse events occurred in 30% of patients and led to ICD modification in 18% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD is associated with changes in the performance of preexisting ICDs. ICD-related adverse events were encountered following LVAD implantation in this cohort, and at times resulted in invasive and noninvasive ICD system modification. Reductions in ICD sensing threshold after LVAD implantation may adversely affect ICD function. Formal ICD interrogation in addition to the regular follow-up testing is warranted post-LVAD. ©2013, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  device modification; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; lead parameters; left ventricular assist device; sensing threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24237034     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  2 in total

Review 1.  Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Therapy in the Patient with a Left Ventricular Assist Device: Still a Black Box.

Authors:  Travis Richardson; Christopher R Ellis
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  Ineffective implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks among patients on continuous left ventricular assist device support: Clinical characteristics and management.

Authors:  Malik Shehadeh; Vijaywant Brar; John Costello; Cyrus Hadadi; Susan O'Donoghue; Seth Worley
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-11-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.