Literature DB >> 24236420

Principles for planning and conducting comparative effectiveness research.

Bryan R Luce1, Michael F Drummond, Robert W Dubois, Peter J Neumann, Bengt Jönsson, Uwe Siebert, J Sanford Schwartz.   

Abstract

AIMS: To develop principles for planning and conducting comparative effectiveness research (CER).
METHODS: Beginning with a modified existing list of health technology assessment principles, we developed a set of CER principles using literature review, engagement of multiple experts and broad stakeholder feedback. RESULTS &
CONCLUSION: Thirteen principles and actions to fulfill their intent are proposed. Principles include clarity of objectives, transparency, engagement of stakeholders, consideration of relevant perspectives, use of relevant comparators, and evaluation of relevant outcomes and treatment heterogeneity. Should these principles be found appropriate and useful, CER studies should be audited for adherence to them and monitored for their impact on care management, patient relevant outcomes and clinical guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24236420     DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  5 in total

Review 1.  Bringing in health technology assessment and cost-effectiveness considerations at an early stage of drug development.

Authors:  Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Clinical Comparative Effectiveness Research Through the Lens of Healthcare Decisionmakers.

Authors:  Eboni G Price-Haywood
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

3.  Oncology comparative effectiveness research: a multistakeholder perspective on principles for conduct and reporting.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Shelby D Reed; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Ken Schaecher; Rahul Dhanda; Debra Patt; Kelly Pendergrass; Mark Walker; Jennifer Malin; Lee Schwartzberg; Kurt Neumann; Elaine Yu; Arliene Ravelo; Art Small
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-06

4.  Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: key informant interviews with Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions.

Authors:  Elaine H Morrato; Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Nilay D Shah; Barbara J Turner
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.744

5.  UNDERSTANDING VARIATIONS IN RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS: A HEALTH PRODUCTION APPROACH.

Authors:  Adrian Towse; Bengt Jonsson; Clare McGrath; Anne Mason; Ruth Puig-Peiro; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Michele Pistollato; Nancy Devlin
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.188

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.