Literature DB >> 24234810

Relationships among grip strength, work capacity, and recovery.

L D Wolf1, L N Matheson, D D Ford, A L Kwak.   

Abstract

The relationship between strength, fatigue, and work capacity is a central issue for occupational rehabilitation. Musculoskeletal impairments often are expressed functionally as a loss of strength. For work tasks that require strength, such impairments may have a detrimental effect on work capacity that is sufficient to be disabling. How important is strength as a component of work capacity? How do work capacity and strength affect recovery time from repetitive forceful upper extremity work ? A sample of 40 healthy subjects comprised of 20 males and 20 females was studied in a model that used the isotonic strength of each subject to set exercise levels for subsequent forceful repetitive gripping tasks. Resistance levels of 75%, 50%, and 25% of maximum were used for one-per-second repetitions until the subject could not maintain that pace. Isometric grip strength was measured after 1 minute of rest and after 5, 10, and 20 minutes. Results indicate that males and females do not differ in terms of their rate of recovery and that the best predictor of recovery time is the immediate measurement of strength loss following cessation of work activity.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24234810     DOI: 10.1007/BF02110394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  23 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a new device to simulate upper extremity work demands.

Authors:  L N Matheson; G Mangseth; J H Segal; J E Grant; K Comisso; S Westing
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1992-09

2.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.

Authors:  L S Caldwell; D B Chaffin; F N Dukes-Dobos; K H Kroemer; L L Laubach; S H Snook; D E Wasserman
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1974-04

3.  The relationship of intermittent isometric exercise to fatigue of hand grip.

Authors:  M O Mundale
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Human strength: terminology, measurement, and interpretation of data.

Authors:  K H Kroemer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Recovery following exhaustive dynamic exercise in the human biceps muscle.

Authors:  G W Kroon; M Naeije
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

6.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; K Weber; G Volland; N Kashman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; C Rennells; L Donahoe
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  The effect of handgrip span on isometric exercise performance.

Authors:  J S Petrofsky; C Williams; G Kamen; A R Lind
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  The wrist position between neutral and ulnar deviation that facilitates the maximum power grip strength.

Authors:  J C Pryce
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Spine rehabilitation. Secondary and tertiary nonoperative care.

Authors:  T G Mayer; P Polatin; B Smith; C Smith; R Gatchel; S A Herring; H Hall; R G Donelson; J Dickey; W English
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

2.  A strength-endurance index for power grip.

Authors:  D W Jones; L D Robertson; S F Figoni
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.