Literature DB >> 24234577

Provider, payor, and patient outcome expectations in back pain rehabilitation.

T Melles1, G McIntosh, H Hall.   

Abstract

Return to work is used routinely to define successful back pain treatment. This study examined how the patient and three professional groups defined success for each of five categories of patients: not sponsored and working, sponsored and working, sponsored on modified duty, sponsored and off work for less than 10 weeks, and sponsored and off work for more than 10 weeks. The groups sampled were treating staff (n = 98), referring physicians (n = 98), third-party sponsors (n = 133), and patients (n = 648) representing all five patient categories. Each group provided a priority ranking for six objectives of treatment: Return to Work, Pain Control, Functional Improvement, Increased Strength and Range of Movement, Positive Attitude Shift, and Acquired Knowledge. The results indicated that the work status of the patient had a significant effect on the ranking of objectives by the treating staff and third-party sponsors. Physicians and patients considered pain control most important regardless of the patient category. Success in back pain rehabilitation is defined by different criteria. The determination of successful outcome must consider the patient's circumstances and acknowledge the perspective of the individual who is defining success.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24234577     DOI: 10.1007/BF02109910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  23 in total

1.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Problems in the assessment of outcome in a back pain clinic.

Authors:  R M Fitzpatrick; M Bury; A O Frank; T Donnelly
Journal:  Int Disabil Stud       Date:  1987

Review 3.  Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: determination of success.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Thomas E Rudy; Bruce A Sorkin
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Epidemiology and impact of low-back pain.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; A A White
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Pain management: long-term follow-up of an inpatient program.

Authors:  J Malec; J J Cayner; R F Harvey; R C Timming
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Characteristics of patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  D F Colvin; R Bettinger; R Knapp; R Pawlicki; J Zimmerman
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  The behavioral management of chronic pain: long-term follow-up with comparison groups.

Authors:  Alan H Roberts; Laurel Reinhardt
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Assigning priority to patients requiring coronary revascularization: consensus principles from a panel of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons.

Authors:  C D Naylor; R S Baigrie; B S Goldman; J A Cairns; D S Beanlands; N Berman; D Borts; D H Fitchett; A Haq; A Hess
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  A prospective two-year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury. An objective assessment procedure.

Authors:  T G Mayer; R J Gatchel; H Mayer; N D Kishino; J Keeley; V Mooney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Factors associated with early discharge from a multidisciplinary work rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ann Marie Carosella; Jeffrey M Lackner; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

1.  The "toxic dose" of system problems: why some injured workers don't return to work as expected.

Authors:  Ellen MacEachen; Agnieszka Kosny; Sue Ferrier; Lori Chambers
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

2.  Guidelines for the identification of barriers to rehabilitation of back injuries.

Authors:  G McIntosh; T Melles; H Hall
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-09

3.  Evaluation of a workplace disability prevention intervention in Canada: examining differing perceptions of stakeholders.

Authors:  Karin Maiwald; Angelique de Rijk; Jaime Guzman; Eva Schonstein; Annalee Yassi
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-06

4.  Psychosocial aspects of injured workers' returning to work (RTW) in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Cecilia W P Li-Tsang; Henky H K Chan; C S Lam; Karen Y l Lo-Hui; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.