Literature DB >> 24234488

A comparison of sampling techniques and summary indices for assessment of water quality in the Yamaska River, Québec, based on benthic macroinvertebrates.

D R Barton1, J L Metcalfe-Smith.   

Abstract

The Yamaska River drainage basin in Quebec, Canada, is intensively farmed and heavily polluted with poorly treated domestic and industrial wastes. We investigated the responses of the resident and colonizing components of the benthic macroinvertebrate community to municipal/industrial versus agricultural pollution in the basin, and evaluated the performances of seven diversity and biotic indices for assessing water quality. Samples of riffle-dwelling, infaunal and colonizing invertebrates were collected from 13 stations representing a wide range of types and degrees of pollution using Surber, scoop and artificial substrate samplers. The data were summarized using the indices S (number of taxa), N (number of individuals), H' (Shannon-Wiener's diversity index), D (Simpson's diversity index), BBI (Belgian Biotic Index), TBI (a modification of Hilsenhoff's Biotic Index), % CHIR (percentage of arthropods consisting of Chironomidae) and %OLIGO (percentage of total organisms consisting of Oligochaeta). Different components of the community generated somewhat different assessments and were, therefore, complementary. Community composition, expressed as the percentage of individuals contributed by major taxonomic groups, reflected the kinds of stresses at a station more consistently than did any of the indices. S and TBI came closest to ranking control, agricultural and municipal/industrial sites in accordance with our a priori classification, both between months and among sampling methods. %OLIGO usually separated municipal/industrial sites from control sites. Other indices were found to be less sensitive, accurate or temporally stable, or were otherwise inappropriate for use with certain sampling methods or for certain types of pollution. With most of our samples, all of the summary indices suggested that the impact of agricultural practices on stream ecosystems may be as severe as the impacts of municipal and industrial wastes.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 24234488     DOI: 10.1007/BF00399689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: history and present status in Europe.

Authors:  J L Metcalfe
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  An evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrate biomass methodology : Part 2. Field assessment and data evaluation.

Authors:  W T Mason; P A Lewis; C I Weber
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Residues of atrazine and N-deethylated atrazine in water from five agricultural watersheds in Québec.

Authors:  D C Muir; J Y Yoo; B E Baker
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.804

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Bioassessment of streams using macroinvertebrates: are the chironomidae necessary?

Authors:  C F Rabeni; N Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comparison of bioassessment results and costs between preserved and unpreserved macroinvertebrate samples from streams.

Authors:  Hanneke E Keizer-Vlek; Paul W Goedhart; Piet F M Verdonschot
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Application of biological measures for stream integrity assessment in south-east Brazil.

Authors:  M P Silveira; D F Baptista; D F Buss; J L Nessimian; M Egler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A model of objective weighting for EIA.

Authors:  L G Ying; Y C Liu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Quantifying Variability in Four U.S. Streams Using a Long-Term Dataset: Patterns in Biotic Endpoints.

Authors:  Camille A Flinders; Douglas B McLaughlin; Renee L Ragsdale
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  An integrated water quality assessment of Damietta and Rosetta branches (Nile River, Egypt) using chemical and biological indices.

Authors:  Seleim M El Sayed; Mahmoud H Hegab; Hesham R A Mola; Nasr M Ahmed; Mohame E Goher
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Use of chironomid deformities to assess environmental degradation in the Yamaska River, Quebec.

Authors:  G A Bird
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.513

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.