Literature DB >> 24234407

Ontogenic development of chemical defense by seedling resin birch: Energy cost of defense production.

J P Bryant1, R Julkunen-Tiitto.   

Abstract

Whether production of chemical defenses by plants is or is not an energetically costly process is an important, but unresolved, question in chemical ecology. We suggest studies of the ontogenetic development of plant defense systems can help resolve the question. As an example of this approach to the cost question, we explore the problems associated with production of immobile chemical defenses that defend juvenile resin birches against browsing by mammals. From this exploration we draw two conclusions: (1) Shortly after germination, production of chemical defenses by small-seeded species, such as birch, is energetically costly. (2) Opposing selection for defense versus competitive ability in the seedling stage of birch has resulted in a trade-off in allocation of carbon to production of immobile chemical defense versus allocation of carbon to production of storage reserves. We suggest this trade-off results in a large indirect cost of defense because carbon used for production of immobile chemical defenses is unavailable for support of growth in the future, but stored carbon can be used to support future growth.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 24234407     DOI: 10.1007/BF02033796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  11 in total

1.  Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley; J P Bryant; F S Chapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Optimal central-place foraging by beavers: Tree-size selection in relation to defensive chemicals of quaking aspen.

Authors:  John M Basey; Stephen H Jenkins; Peter E Busher
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Phenolic compounds of willow bark as deterrents against feeding by mountain hare.

Authors:  J Tahvanainen; E Helle; R Julkunen-Tiitto; A Lavola
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Defense of winter-dormant Alaska paper birch against snowshoe hares.

Authors:  Paul B Reichardt; John P Bryant; Thomas P Clausen; Gregory D Wieland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  THE EVOLUTION OF RESISTANCE TO HERBIVORY IN IPOMOEA PURPUREA. II. NATURAL SELECTION BY INSECTS AND COSTS OF RESISTANCE.

Authors:  Ellen L Simms; Mark D Rausher
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Phytochemical deterrence of snowshoe hare browsing by adventitious shoots of four alaskan trees.

Authors:  J P Bryant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Pinosylvin methyl ether deters snowshoe hare feeding on green alder.

Authors:  J P Bryant; G D Wieland; P B Reichardt; V E Lewis; M C McCarthy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Winter chemical defense of Alaskan balsam poplar against snowshoe hares.

Authors:  P B Reichardt; J P Bryant; B R Mattes; T P Clausen; F S Chapin; M Meyer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Pinosylvin and pinosylvin methyl ether as feeding deterrents in green alder.

Authors:  T P Clausen; P B Reichardt; J P Bryant
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Camphor from juvenile white spruce as an antifeedant for snowshoe hares.

Authors:  A R Sinclair; M K Jogia; R J Andersen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  20 in total

1.  Testing the effects of drying methods on willow flavonoids, tannins, and salicylates.

Authors:  R Julkunen-Tiitto; S Sorsa
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance.

Authors:  Tod L Osier; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Ontogenetic shifts in a prey's chemical defences influence feeding responses of a snake predator.

Authors:  John Llewelyn; Kris Bell; Lin Schwarzkopf; Ross A Alford; Richard Shine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Plant defence as a complex and changing phenotype throughout ontogeny.

Authors:  Sofía Ochoa-López; Nora Villamil; Paulina Zedillo-Avelleyra; Karina Boege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Variation in birch (Betula pendula) shoot secondary chemistry due to genotype, environment, and ontogeny.

Authors:  Marja-Leena Laitinen; Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto; Jorma Tahvanainen; Jaakko Heinonen; Matti Rousi
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Fitness costs of mutations affecting the systemic acquired resistance pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Andrew J Heidel; Joseph D Clarke; Janis Antonovics; Xinnian Dong
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Age-related shifts in leaf chemistry of clonal aspen (Populus tremuloides).

Authors:  Jack R Donaldson; Michael T Stevens; Heidi R Barnhill; Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Ontogenetic and temporal trajectories of chemical defence in a cyanogenic eucalypt.

Authors:  Jason Q D Goodger; Thereis Y S Choo; Ian E Woodrow
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Impacts of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on forests: phytochemistry, trophic interactions, and ecosystem dynamics.

Authors:  Richard L Lindroth
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Papyriferic acid, an antifeedant triterpene from birch trees, inhibits succinate dehydrogenase from liver mitochondria.

Authors:  Stuart McLean; Stephen M Richards; Siow-Leng Cover; Sue Brandon; Noel W Davies; John P Bryant; Thomas P Clausen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.