Literature DB >> 24234392

Variability of isometric and isotonic leg exercise: Utility for detection of submaximal effort.

M E Robinson1, P D O'Connor, J L Riley, S Kvaal, F R Shirley.   

Abstract

A number of studies have investigated the use of variability measures in the detection of submaximal or insincere efforts in strength testing. The underlying assumption of these approaches is that submaximal efforts will be more variable than maximal efforts. Previous studies have investigated the variability of torque production in isometric or isokinetic tasks with mixed results. The present study investigated the variability of torque production and velocity in isometric and isotonic leg extension tasks, respectively. Fifteen asymptomatic subjects participated in a within-subject counterbalanced design in which they were asked to perform maximally and submaximally in both isometric and isotonic leg extension tasks. Results indicated that both isometric and isotonic tasks showed greater variability (measured by coefficient of variation) in the submaximal effort condition. However, the sensitivity to detect submaximal efforts was much greater for the isotonic velocity variability condition. It was concluded that the isotonic approach showed promise for clinical application, but that the isometric task had unacceptably poor classification rates, consistent with previous research.

Year:  1994        PMID: 24234392     DOI: 10.1007/BF02109972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  11 in total

1.  The relationship between force and force variability in minimal and near-maximal static and dynamic contractions.

Authors:  D E Sherwood; R A Schmidt
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  The force/force-variability relationship under controlled temporal conditions.

Authors:  D E Sherwood; R A Schmidt; C B Walter
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Reproducibility of maximal versus submaximal efforts in an isometric lumbar extension task.

Authors:  M E Robinson; M Mac Millan; P O'Connor; A Fuller; J E Cassisi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1991-12

4.  Detecting submaximal efforts in grip strength testing with the coefficient of variation.

Authors:  M E Robinson; M E Geisser; C S Hanson; P D O'Connor
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-03

5.  Physical and psychosocial correlates of test-retest isometric torque variability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  M E Robinson; P D O'Connor; M Macmillan; F R Shirley; A F Greene; M E Geisser; A K Fuller
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1992-03

6.  Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities.

Authors:  J C Agre; J L Magness; S Z Hull; K C Wright; T L Baxter; R Patterson; L Stradel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Isokinetic trunk and lifting strength measurements: variability as an indicator of effort.

Authors:  R G Hazard; S Reid; J Fenwick; V Reeves
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Detecting sincerity of effort when measuring grip strength.

Authors:  B R Niebuhr; R Marion
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1987-02

9.  Force variability in isometric responses.

Authors:  K M Newell; L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts.

Authors:  R A Schmidt; H Zelaznik; B Hawkins; J S Frank; J T Quinn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.