PURPOSE: Our aim was to analyse the results of our first 100 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures, of primary (nonsmall-cell lung cancers, NSCLC) and secondary (MTS) lung cancers to assess what lessons could be learned from our experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed 100 lesions (mean size 23 mm) in 81 patients (25 NSCLC/56 MTS). On the basis of the clinical-radiological evolution, we analysed complete ablation (CA) versus partial ablation (PA) at the first computed tomography (CT) scan and during the follow-up (mean 23 months), time to progression (TTP) and survival. Possible predictive factors for local effectiveness and survival were sought. RESULTS: At the first CT scan CA was obtained in 88 %; the difference between the mean diameter of lesions achieving CA and PA was significant (20 versus 38 mm; p = 0.0001). A threshold of 30 mm (p = 0.0030) and the histological type (NSCLC 75 %/MTS 94 %; p = 0.0305) were also predictive of CA. A total of 18.4 % of the CA recurred (average TTP 19 months). Survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 84.5, 65.4 and 51.5 %, respectively. The predictors of survival at 3 years were the coexistence of other MTS (p = 0.0422) and a diameter <20 mm (p = 0.0323), but not the local effectiveness of RFA. CONCLUSION: RFA for thoracic malignancies is accurate for lesions up to 30 mm, especially if metastatic; survival is more closely related to staging factors than to the local effectiveness of RFA.
PURPOSE: Our aim was to analyse the results of our first 100 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures, of primary (nonsmall-cell lung cancers, NSCLC) and secondary (MTS) lung cancers to assess what lessons could be learned from our experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed 100 lesions (mean size 23 mm) in 81 patients (25 NSCLC/56 MTS). On the basis of the clinical-radiological evolution, we analysed complete ablation (CA) versus partial ablation (PA) at the first computed tomography (CT) scan and during the follow-up (mean 23 months), time to progression (TTP) and survival. Possible predictive factors for local effectiveness and survival were sought. RESULTS: At the first CT scan CA was obtained in 88 %; the difference between the mean diameter of lesions achieving CA and PA was significant (20 versus 38 mm; p = 0.0001). A threshold of 30 mm (p = 0.0030) and the histological type (NSCLC 75 %/MTS 94 %; p = 0.0305) were also predictive of CA. A total of 18.4 % of the CA recurred (average TTP 19 months). Survival at 1, 2 and 3 years was 84.5, 65.4 and 51.5 %, respectively. The predictors of survival at 3 years were the coexistence of other MTS (p = 0.0422) and a diameter <20 mm (p = 0.0323), but not the local effectiveness of RFA. CONCLUSION: RFA for thoracic malignancies is accurate for lesions up to 30 mm, especially if metastatic; survival is more closely related to staging factors than to the local effectiveness of RFA.
Authors: S Nahum Goldberg; Clement J Grassi; John F Cardella; J William Charboneau; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; Alice R Gillams; Robert A Kane; Fred T Lee; Tito Livraghi; John McGahan; David A Phillips; Hyunchul Rhim; Stuart G Silverman; Luigi Solbiati; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; Suresh Vedantham; David Sacks Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: R T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; A Lubienski; A Schrader; C Trumm; M F Reiser; T K Helmberger Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2006-05-26 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Tristan D Yan; Julie King; Adrian Sjarif; Derek Glenn; Karin Steinke; David L Morris Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-09-29 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hiran C Fernando; Alberto De Hoyos; Rodney J Landreneau; Sebastian Gilbert; William E Gooding; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; Chandra Belani; James D Luketich Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Caroline J Simon; Damian E Dupuy; Thomas A DiPetrillo; Howard P Safran; C Alexander Grieco; Thomas Ng; William W Mayo-Smith Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Simona Salati; Antonella Petrillo; Elio Di Bernardo; Roberta Grassi; Raffaele Palaia; Ginevra Danti; Michelearcangelo La Porta; Matteo Cadossi; Gorana Gašljević; Gregor Sersa; Francesco Izzo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.390