BACKGROUND: This paper aims to review controversies in the management of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (MIFTC) and to reach an evidence-based consensus. METHOD: MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted using keywords related to MIFTC. The search term was identified in the title, abstract, or medical subject heading. Available literature meeting the inclusion criteria were assigned the appropriate levels of evidence and recommendations in accordance with accepted international standards. Results were discussed at the 2013 Workshop of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons devoted to MIFTC. RESULTS: Published papers on MIFTC present inadequate power with a III–IV level of evidence and C grade of recommendation. Several issues demanded a comparison of published studies from different medical reports regarding MIFTC definition, specimen processing, characteristics, diagnosis, prognoses, and therapy. As a consequence, it is difficult to make valuable statements on MIFTC with a sufficient recommendation rating. MIFTC diagnosis requires clearer, unequivocal, and reproducible criteria for pathologist, surgeons, and endocrinologists to use in the management of these patients. If the distinction between MIFTC and WIFTC cannot be made, an expert in thyroid pathologist should be consulted. CONCLUSION: According to published papers, the following conclusions can be drawn. (a) Candidates for hemithyroidectomy are MIFTC with exclusive capsular invasion, patients <45 years old at presentation, tumor size <40 mm, without vascular invasion, and without any node or distant metastases. (b) Candidates for total thyroidectomy are MIFTC in patients ≥45 years at presentation, tumor size ≥40 mm, vascular invasion present, positive nodes, and positive distant metastases. (c) In the absence of clinical evidence for lymph node metastasis, patients with MIFTC do not require prophylactic lymph node dissection. (d) Radio iodine ablation is indicated in elderly patients (>45 years), large tumor size (>40 mm), extensive vascular invasion, presence of distant synchronous or metachronous metastasis, positive nodes, and if recurrence is noted at follow-up.
BACKGROUND: This paper aims to review controversies in the management of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (MIFTC) and to reach an evidence-based consensus. METHOD: MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted using keywords related to MIFTC. The search term was identified in the title, abstract, or medical subject heading. Available literature meeting the inclusion criteria were assigned the appropriate levels of evidence and recommendations in accordance with accepted international standards. Results were discussed at the 2013 Workshop of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons devoted to MIFTC. RESULTS: Published papers on MIFTC present inadequate power with a III–IV level of evidence and C grade of recommendation. Several issues demanded a comparison of published studies from different medical reports regarding MIFTC definition, specimen processing, characteristics, diagnosis, prognoses, and therapy. As a consequence, it is difficult to make valuable statements on MIFTC with a sufficient recommendation rating. MIFTC diagnosis requires clearer, unequivocal, and reproducible criteria for pathologist, surgeons, and endocrinologists to use in the management of these patients. If the distinction between MIFTC and WIFTC cannot be made, an expert in thyroid pathologist should be consulted. CONCLUSION: According to published papers, the following conclusions can be drawn. (a) Candidates for hemithyroidectomy are MIFTC with exclusive capsular invasion, patients <45 years old at presentation, tumor size <40 mm, without vascular invasion, and without any node or distant metastases. (b) Candidates for total thyroidectomy are MIFTC in patients ≥45 years at presentation, tumor size ≥40 mm, vascular invasion present, positive nodes, and positive distant metastases. (c) In the absence of clinical evidence for lymph node metastasis, patients with MIFTC do not require prophylactic lymph node dissection. (d) Radio iodine ablation is indicated in elderly patients (>45 years), large tumor size (>40 mm), extensive vascular invasion, presence of distant synchronous or metachronous metastasis, positive nodes, and if recurrence is noted at follow-up.
Authors: Jeffrey Liu; Bhuvanesh Singh; Giovanni Tallini; Diane L Carlson; Nora Katabi; Ashok Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Ronald A Ghossein Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Henning Dralle; Thomas J Musholt; Jochen Schabram; Thomas Steinmüller; Andreja Frilling; Dietmar Simon; Peter E Goretzki; Bruno Niederle; Christian Scheuba; Thomas Clerici; Michael Hermann; Jochen Kußmann; Kerstin Lorenz; Christoph Nies; Peter Schabram; Arnold Trupka; Andreas Zielke; Wolfram Karges; Markus Luster; Kurt W Schmid; Dirk Vordermark; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Reinhard Mühlenberg; Otmar Schober; Harald Rimmele; Andreas Machens Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Zhaowen Zhu; Manoj Gandhi; Marina N Nikiforova; Andrew H Fischer; Yuri E Nikiforov Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Zubair Baloch; Virginia A LiVolsi; Pooja Jain; Rishi Jain; Ibrahim Aljada; Susan Mandel; Jill E Langer; Prabodh K Gupta Journal: Diagn Cytopathol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 1.582
Authors: Reza Asari; Oskar Koperek; Christian Scheuba; Philipp Riss; Klaus Kaserer; Martha Hoffmann; Bruno Niederle Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Gary L Francis; Steven G Waguespack; Andrew J Bauer; Peter Angelos; Salvatore Benvenga; Janete M Cerutti; Catherine A Dinauer; Jill Hamilton; Ian D Hay; Markus Luster; Marguerite T Parisi; Marianna Rachmiel; Geoffrey B Thompson; Shunichi Yamashita Journal: Thyroid Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: C I Badulescu; R J Marlowe; A Piciu; R Buiga; O Barbos; N I Bejinariu; G Chereches; E Barbus; E A Bonci; D Piciu Journal: Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) Date: 2018 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 0.877
Authors: Juan J Díez; Victoria Alcázar; Pedro Iglesias; Ana Romero-Lluch; Julia Sastre; Begoña Pérez Corral; Carles Zafón; Juan Carlos Galofré; María José Pamplona Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2021-02