OBJECTIVE: This study examined 12-month rates of service use for mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among adolescents. METHODS: Data were from the National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), a survey of DSM-IV mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders and service use. RESULTS: In the past 12 months, 45.0% of adolescents with psychiatric disorders received some form of service. The most likely were those with ADHD (73.8%), conduct disorder (73.4%), or oppositional defiant disorder (71.0%). Least likely were those with specific phobias (40.7%) and any anxiety disorder (41.4%). Among those with any disorder, services were more likely to be received in a school setting (23.6%) or in a specialty mental health setting (22.8%) than in a general medical setting (10.1%). Youths with any disorder also received services in juvenile justice settings (4.5%), complementary and alternative medicine (5.3%), and human services settings (7.9%). Although general medical providers treated a larger proportion of youths with mood disorders than with behavior disorders, they were more likely to treat youths with behavior disorders because of the larger number of the latter (11.5% of 1,465 versus 13.9% of 820). Black youths were significantly less likely than white youths to receive specialty mental health or general medical services for mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this analysis of NCS-A data confirm those of earlier, smaller studies, that only a minority of youths with psychiatric disorders receive treatment of any sort. Much of this treatment was provided in service settings in which few providers were likely to have specialist mental health training.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined 12-month rates of service use for mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among adolescents. METHODS: Data were from the National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), a survey of DSM-IV mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders and service use. RESULTS: In the past 12 months, 45.0% of adolescents with psychiatric disorders received some form of service. The most likely were those with ADHD (73.8%), conduct disorder (73.4%), or oppositional defiant disorder (71.0%). Least likely were those with specific phobias (40.7%) and any anxiety disorder (41.4%). Among those with any disorder, services were more likely to be received in a school setting (23.6%) or in a specialty mental health setting (22.8%) than in a general medical setting (10.1%). Youths with any disorder also received services in juvenile justice settings (4.5%), complementary and alternative medicine (5.3%), and human services settings (7.9%). Although general medical providers treated a larger proportion of youths with mood disorders than with behavior disorders, they were more likely to treat youths with behavior disorders because of the larger number of the latter (11.5% of 1,465 versus 13.9% of 820). Black youths were significantly less likely than white youths to receive specialty mental health or general medical services for mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this analysis of NCS-A data confirm those of earlier, smaller studies, that only a minority of youths with psychiatric disorders receive treatment of any sort. Much of this treatment was provided in service settings in which few providers were likely to have specialist mental health training.
Authors: A J Flisher; R A Kramer; R C Grosser; M Alegria; H R Bird; K H Bourdon; S H Goodman; S Greenwald; S M Horwitz; R E Moore; W E Narrow; C W Hoven Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: S Laitinen-Krispijn; J Van der Ende; A I Wierdsma; F C Verhulst Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: P Wu; C W Hoven; H R Bird; R E Moore; P Cohen; M Alegria; M K Dulcan; S H Goodman; S M Horwitz; J H Lichtman; W E Narrow; D S Rae; D A Regier; M T Roper Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: P J Leaf; M Alegria; P Cohen; S H Goodman; S M Horwitz; C W Hoven; W E Narrow; M Vaden-Kiernan; D A Regier Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: M J Briggs-Gowan; S M Horwitz; M E Schwab-Stone; J M Leventhal; P J Leaf Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Julia Rosenberg; Marjorie S Rosenthal; Laura D Cramer; Eli R Lebowitz; Mona Sharifi; Katherine Yun Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Laura P Richardson; Evette Ludman; Elizabeth McCauley; Jeff Lindenbaum; Cindy Larison; Chuan Zhou; Greg Clarke; David Brent; Wayne Katon Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Helen-Maria Vasiliadis; Fatoumata Binta Diallo; Louis Rochette; Mark Smith; Donald Langille; Elizabeth Lin; Steve Kisely; Eric Fombonne; Angus H Thompson; Johanne Renaud; Alain Lesage Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Azeesat Babajide; Ana Ortin; Chiaying Wei; Laura Mufson; Cristiane S Duarte Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Karen T G Schwartz; Amanda A Bowling; John F Dickerson; Frances L Lynch; David A Brent; Giovanna Porta; Satish Iyengar; V Robin Weersing Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2018-11
Authors: Quyen M Ngo; Jessica I Ramirez; Sara F Stein; Rebecca M Cunningham; Stephen T Chermack; Vijay Singh; Maureen A Walton Journal: Violence Against Women Date: 2018-08
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Andrew J Epstein; Elizabeth A Stuart; Rebecca L Haffajee; Emma E McGinty; Alisa B Busch; Haiden A Huskamp; Colleen L Barry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Stephanie K Doupnik; John Lawlor; Bonnie T Zima; Tumaini R Coker; Naomi S Bardach; Matt Hall; Jay G Berry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 7.124