PURPOSE: The characteristic neuropathological changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are deposition of amyloid senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The (18)F-labeled amyloid tracer, [(18)F]2-[(2-{(E)-2-[2-(dimethylamino)-1,3-thiazol-5-yl]vinyl}-1,3-benzoxazol-6-yl)oxy]-3-fluoropropan-1-ol (FACT), one of the benzoxazole derivatives, was recently developed. In the present study, deposition of amyloid senile plaques was measured by positron emission tomography (PET) with both [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) and [(18)F]FACT in the same subjects, and the regional uptakes of both radiotracers were directly compared. METHODS: Two PET scans, one of each with [(11)C]PIB and [(18)F]FACT, were performed sequentially on six normal control subjects, two mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and six AD patients. The standardized uptake value ratio of brain regions to the cerebellum was calculated with partial volume correction using magnetic resonance (MR) images to remove the effects of white matter accumulation. RESULTS: No significant differences in the cerebral cortical uptake were observed between normal control subjects and AD patients in [(18)F]FACT studies without partial volume correction, while significant differences were observed in [(11)C]PIB. After partial volume correction, the cerebral cortical uptake was significantly larger in AD patients than in normal control subjects for [(18)F]FACT studies as well as [(11)C]PIB. Relatively lower uptakes of [(11)C]PIB in distribution were observed in the medial side of the temporal cortex and in the occipital cortex as compared with [(18)F]FACT. Relatively higher uptake of [(11)C]PIB in distribution was observed in the frontal and parietal cortices. CONCLUSION: Since [(18)F]FACT might bind more preferentially to dense-cored amyloid deposition, regional differences in cerebral cortical uptake between [(11)C]PIB and [(18)F]FACT might be due to differences in regional distribution between diffuse and dense-cored amyloid plaque shown in the autoradiographic and histochemical assays of postmortem AD brain sections.
PURPOSE: The characteristic neuropathological changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are deposition of amyloid senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The (18)F-labeled amyloid tracer, [(18)F]2-[(2-{(E)-2-[2-(dimethylamino)-1,3-thiazol-5-yl]vinyl}-1,3-benzoxazol-6-yl)oxy]-3-fluoropropan-1-ol (FACT), one of the benzoxazole derivatives, was recently developed. In the present study, deposition of amyloid senile plaques was measured by positron emission tomography (PET) with both [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PIB) and [(18)F]FACT in the same subjects, and the regional uptakes of both radiotracers were directly compared. METHODS: Two PET scans, one of each with [(11)C]PIB and [(18)F]FACT, were performed sequentially on six normal control subjects, two mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and six ADpatients. The standardized uptake value ratio of brain regions to the cerebellum was calculated with partial volume correction using magnetic resonance (MR) images to remove the effects of white matter accumulation. RESULTS: No significant differences in the cerebral cortical uptake were observed between normal control subjects and ADpatients in [(18)F]FACT studies without partial volume correction, while significant differences were observed in [(11)C]PIB. After partial volume correction, the cerebral cortical uptake was significantly larger in ADpatients than in normal control subjects for [(18)F]FACT studies as well as [(11)C]PIB. Relatively lower uptakes of [(11)C]PIB in distribution were observed in the medial side of the temporal cortex and in the occipital cortex as compared with [(18)F]FACT. Relatively higher uptake of [(11)C]PIB in distribution was observed in the frontal and parietal cortices. CONCLUSION: Since [(18)F]FACT might bind more preferentially to dense-cored amyloid deposition, regional differences in cerebral cortical uptake between [(11)C]PIB and [(18)F]FACT might be due to differences in regional distribution between diffuse and dense-cored amyloid plaque shown in the autoradiographic and histochemical assays of postmortem AD brain sections.
Authors: Henry Engler; Anton Forsberg; Ove Almkvist; Gunnar Blomquist; Emma Larsson; Irina Savitcheva; Anders Wall; Anna Ringheim; Bengt Långström; Agneta Nordberg Journal: Brain Date: 2006-07-19 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Randy L Buckner; Abraham Z Snyder; Benjamin J Shannon; Gina LaRossa; Rimmon Sachs; Anthony F Fotenos; Yvette I Sheline; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; John C Morris; Mark A Mintun Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-08-24 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Seok Rye Choi; Geoff Golding; Zhiping Zhuang; Wei Zhang; Nathaniel Lim; Franz Hefti; Tyler E Benedum; Michael R Kilbourn; Daniel Skovronsky; Hank F Kung Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Chester A Mathis; Yanming Wang; Daniel P Holt; Guo-Feng Huang; Manik L Debnath; William E Klunk Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2003-06-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Masahiro Ono; Alan Wilson; Jose Nobrega; David Westaway; Paul Verhoeff; Zhi-Ping Zhuang; Mei-Ping Kung; Hank F Kung Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: George Crișan; Nastasia Sanda Moldovean-Cioroianu; Diana-Gabriela Timaru; Gabriel Andrieș; Călin Căinap; Vasile Chiș Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 6.208