Literature DB >> 24232512

Budding and prosthecate bacteria from freshwater habitats of various trophic states.

J T Staley1, K C Marshall, V B Skerman.   

Abstract

Budding and prosthecate bacteria were enumerated in spring and summer by viable counting procedures in several freshwater habitats in Australia including oligotrophic lakes, a mesotrophic lake, and eutrophic ponds.Caulobacter spp. were the most numerous type encountered. They were present in the highest concentrations (exceeding 1000/ml) in the mesotrophic lake during the summer. Their proportion to total viable heterotrophic bacteria was also highest (35.1 to 37.7) in this habitat. From 17 to 330/mlCaulobacter spp. were counted in the eutrophic habitats where their proportion to total viable numbers was less than 1.0%. In the oligotrophic lakes they varied from 5 to 23/ml and comprised greater than 5% of the total viable count.Hyphomicrobium- like bacteria were also numerous in the mesotrophic lake and in one oligotrophic lake during the summer sampling period.Ancalomicrobium spp. occurred in high concentrations (130/ml) in the mesotrophic lake. Budding bacteria of thePlanctomyces-Pasteuria group were most numerous in the eutrophic habitats where as many as 240/ml were counted; their proportion to total heterotrophs remained relatively constant regardless of trophic state, however. A similar pattern was observed withProsthecobacter spp.

Entities:  

Year:  1980        PMID: 24232512     DOI: 10.1007/BF02020332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  10 in total

1.  Prosthecobacter fusiformis nov. gen. et sp., the fusiform caulobacter.

Authors:  J T Staley; J A Bont; K Jonge
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CAULOBACTER GROUP.

Authors:  J S POINDEXTER
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1964-09

3.  High numbers of prosthecate bacteria in pulp mill waste aeration lagoons.

Authors:  P M Stanley; E J Ordal; J T Staley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  RHODOMICROBIUM VANNIELII, A NEW PHOTOHETEROTROPHIC BACTERIUM.

Authors:  E Duchow; H C Douglas
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1949-10       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Studies of Freshwater Bacteria: II. Stalked Bacteria, a New Order of Schizomycetes.

Authors:  A T Henrici; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1935-07       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Caulobacter versus Bacillus spec. div.

Authors:  A L HOUWINK
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1951-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Morphogenesis and differentiation in Rhodomicrobium vannielii and other budding and prosthecate bacteria.

Authors:  R Whittenbury; C S Dow
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-09

8.  Isolation and description of a non-motile, fusiform, stalked bacterium, a representative of a new genus.

Authors:  J A De Bont; J T Staley; H S Pankratz
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Prosthecomicrobium and Ancalomicrobium: new prosthecate freshwater bacteria.

Authors:  J T Staley
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Incidence of prosthecate bacteria in a polluted stream.

Authors:  J T Staley
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-10
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Methods and sources for the enrichment and isolation of budding, nonprosthecate bacteria from freshwater.

Authors:  P Hirsch; M Müller
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  A membrane adsorption-SEM technique for observing neuston organisms.

Authors:  J S Maki; C C Remsen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.552

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.