| Literature DB >> 24232451 |
Peter Kiss1, Gyongyver Vadasz, Blanka Kiss-Illes, Gabor Horvath, Andrea Tamas, Dora Reglodi, Miklos Koppan.
Abstract
Perinatal asphyxia during delivery produces long-term disability and represents a major problem in neonatal and pediatric care. Numerous neuroprotective approaches have been described to decrease the effects of perinatal asphyxia. Enriched environment is a popular strategy to counteract nervous system injuries. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether enriched environment is able to decrease the asphyxia-induced neurobehavioral developmental delay in neonatal rats. Asphyxia was induced in ready-to-deliver mothers by removing the pups by caesarian section after 15 min of asphyxia. Somatic and neurobehavioral development was tested daily and motor coordination weekly. Our results show that rats undergoing perinatal asphyxia had a marked developmental delay and worse performance in motor coordination tests. However, pups kept in enriched environment showed a decrease in the developmental delay observed in control asphyctic pups. Rats growing up in enriched environment did not show decrease in weight gain after the first week and the delay in reflex appearance was not as marked as in control rats. In addition, the development of motor coordination was not as strikingly delayed as in the control group. Short-term neurofunctional outcome are known to correlate with long-term deficits. Our results thus show that enriched environment could be a powerful strategy to decrease the deleterious developmental effects of perinatal asphyxia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24232451 PMCID: PMC3856064 DOI: 10.3390/ijms141122258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) Daily changes in body weight (*** p < 0.001 small cage control vs. small cage asphyctic group; ###p < 0.001 small cage asphyctic vs. enriched asphyctic group); and (B) Appearance of physical parameters (eye opening, ear unfold, incisor eruption; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 2(A) Appearance of crossed extensor reflex, ear twitch-, eyelid reflex and auditory startle reflex; (B) Appearance of forelimb placing and grasp; (C) Appearance of hindlimb placing and grasp; and (D) Air righting reflex appearance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 3(A) Negative geotaxis and gait appearance; (B) Gait test performance (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 small cage control vs. small cage asphyxia).
Figure 4Motor coordination tests: Grid walking and footfault test. (A) Number of total steps; and (B) Number of total faults (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 5Enriched environment.