RATIONALE: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is considered the leading inherited cause of intellectual disability and autism. In FXS, the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene is silenced and the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is not expressed, resulting in the characteristic features of the syndrome. Despite recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of FXS, there is still no cure for this condition; current treatment is symptomatic. Preclinical research is essential in the development of potential therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVES: This review provides an overview of the preclinical evidence supporting metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonists as therapeutic agents for FXS. RESULTS: According to the mGluR theory of FXS, the absence of FMRP leads to enhanced glutamatergic signaling via mGluR5, which leads to increased protein synthesis and defects in synaptic plasticity including enhanced long-term depression. As such, efforts to develop agents that target the underlying pathophysiology of FXS have focused on mGluR5 modulation. Animal models, particularly the Fmr1 knockout mouse model, have become invaluable in exploring therapeutic approaches on an electrophysiological, behavioral, biochemical, and neuroanatomical level. Two direct approaches are currently being investigated for FXS treatment: reactivating the FMR1 gene and compensating for the lack of FMRP. The latter approach has yielded promising results, with mGluR5 antagonists showing efficacy in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting mGluR5 is a valid approach for the development of therapeutic agents that target the underlying pathophysiology of FXS. Several compounds are currently in development, with encouraging results.
RATIONALE: Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is considered the leading inherited cause of intellectual disability and autism. In FXS, the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene is silenced and the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) is not expressed, resulting in the characteristic features of the syndrome. Despite recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of FXS, there is still no cure for this condition; current treatment is symptomatic. Preclinical research is essential in the development of potential therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVES: This review provides an overview of the preclinical evidence supporting metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonists as therapeutic agents for FXS. RESULTS: According to the mGluR theory of FXS, the absence of FMRP leads to enhanced glutamatergic signaling via mGluR5, which leads to increased protein synthesis and defects in synaptic plasticity including enhanced long-term depression. As such, efforts to develop agents that target the underlying pathophysiology of FXS have focused on mGluR5 modulation. Animal models, particularly the Fmr1 knockout mouse model, have become invaluable in exploring therapeutic approaches on an electrophysiological, behavioral, biochemical, and neuroanatomical level. Two direct approaches are currently being investigated for FXS treatment: reactivating the FMR1 gene and compensating for the lack of FMRP. The latter approach has yielded promising results, with mGluR5 antagonists showing efficacy in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting mGluR5 is a valid approach for the development of therapeutic agents that target the underlying pathophysiology of FXS. Several compounds are currently in development, with encouraging results.
Authors: Mariagiulia Torrioli; Silvia Vernacotola; Chiara Setini; Francesca Bevilacqua; Diego Martinelli; Mike Snape; Julie A Hutchison; Francesca Romana Di Raimo; Elisabetta Tabolacci; Giovanni Neri Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Sandra van 't Padje; Bart Engels; Lau Blonden; Lies-Anne Severijnen; Frans Verheijen; Ben A Oostra; Rob Willemsen Journal: Dev Genes Evol Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 0.900
Authors: F Gasparini; K Lingenhöhl; N Stoehr; P J Flor; M Heinrich; I Vranesic; M Biollaz; H Allgeier; R Heckendorn; S Urwyler; M A Varney; E C Johnson; S D Hess; S P Rao; A I Sacaan; E M Santori; G Veliçelebi; R Kuhn Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: I J Weiler; S A Irwin; A Y Klintsova; C M Spencer; A D Brazelton; K Miyashiro; T A Comery; B Patel; J Eberwine; W T Greenough Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-05-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alexandros K Kanellopoulos; Ourania Semelidou; Andriana G Kotini; Maria Anezaki; Efthimios M C Skoulakis Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Thomas C Dockendorff; Henry S Su; Sean M J McBride; Zhaohai Yang; Catherine H Choi; Kathleen K Siwicki; Amita Sehgal; Thomas A Jongens Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Aubin Michalon; Michael Sidorov; Theresa M Ballard; Laurence Ozmen; Will Spooren; Joseph G Wettstein; Georg Jaeschke; Mark F Bear; Lothar Lindemann Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Rocco D Gogliotti; Anna L Blobaum; Ryan M Morrison; J Scott Daniels; James M Salovich; Yiu-Yin Cheung; Alice L Rodriguez; Matthew T Loch; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley; Colleen M Niswender; Corey R Hopkins Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Amber L LaCrosse; Sara B Taylor; Natali E Nemirovsky; Justin T Gass; Michael F Olive Journal: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Laura J Stoppel; Benjamin D Auerbach; Rebecca K Senter; Anthony R Preza; Robert J Lefkowitz; Mark F Bear Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Andrew S Felts; Katrina A Bollinger; Christopher J Brassard; Alice L Rodriguez; Ryan D Morrison; J Scott Daniels; Anna L Blobaum; Colleen M Niswender; Carrie K Jones; P Jeffrey Conn; Kyle A Emmitte; Craig W Lindsley Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Shervin Gholizadeh; Jason Arsenault; Ingrid Cong Yang Xuan; Laura K Pacey; David R Hampson Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 7.853