Paul Cordo1, Steven Wolf, Jau-Shin Lou, Ross Bogey, Matthew Stevenson, John Hayes, Elliot Roth. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, and AMES Technology, Inc, Portland, Oregon (P.C.); Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medicine and Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (S.L.W.); Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton (J.-S.L.); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas (R.B.); College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago (M.S.); School of Optometry, Pacific University, Forest Grove, Oregon (J.H.); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, and Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (E.R.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have addressed the rehabilitation of hand function in persons with severe impairment following stroke, and few therapeutic options are available for treatment. We investigated whether an intervention of robot-assisted movement and muscle vibration could reduce impairment and enable hand-opening to a greater extent when combined with torque biofeedback or electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback. METHODS:Forty-three participants with severe hand impairment due to chronic stroke (≥1 year poststroke) were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups receiving assisted movement and muscle vibration combined with either torque or EMG biofeedback. Each participant received 30 sessions (30 minutes duration per session) directed at the impaired hand over 10 to 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed using the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), Stroke Impact Scale, and Box-and-Block Test scores. RESULTS:Twenty-eight of 43 participants had no baseline finger extension; the remainder had an average of 23 ± 26 mm extension in the most active finger. Assisted movement and muscle vibration were associated with a significant increase in all outcome measures across both treatment groups, and for the UE-FMA and Stroke Impact Scale within treatment groups, with no significant difference between groups. Based on the Box-and-Block Test scores, the assisted movement and muscle vibration intervention did not restore functional hand-opening to participants with baseline UE-FMA scores less than 17/66, regardless of the form of biofeedback. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:Assisted movement and muscle vibration, combined with either EMG or torque biofeedback, appears to reduce upper limb impairment, improve volitional activation of the hand muscles, and restore a modicum of hand function in some persons with severe hand impairment due to chronic stroke.Video Abstract available (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A64) for more insights from the authors.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have addressed the rehabilitation of hand function in persons with severe impairment following stroke, and few therapeutic options are available for treatment. We investigated whether an intervention of robot-assisted movement and muscle vibration could reduce impairment and enable hand-opening to a greater extent when combined with torque biofeedback or electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback. METHODS: Forty-three participants with severe hand impairment due to chronic stroke (≥1 year poststroke) were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups receiving assisted movement and muscle vibration combined with either torque or EMG biofeedback. Each participant received 30 sessions (30 minutes duration per session) directed at the impaired hand over 10 to 12 weeks. Outcomes were assessed using the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA), Stroke Impact Scale, and Box-and-Block Test scores. RESULTS: Twenty-eight of 43 participants had no baseline finger extension; the remainder had an average of 23 ± 26 mm extension in the most active finger. Assisted movement and muscle vibration were associated with a significant increase in all outcome measures across both treatment groups, and for the UE-FMA and Stroke Impact Scale within treatment groups, with no significant difference between groups. Based on the Box-and-Block Test scores, the assisted movement and muscle vibration intervention did not restore functional hand-opening to participants with baseline UE-FMA scores less than 17/66, regardless of the form of biofeedback. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Assisted movement and muscle vibration, combined with either EMG or torque biofeedback, appears to reduce upper limb impairment, improve volitional activation of the hand muscles, and restore a modicum of hand function in some persons with severe hand impairment due to chronic stroke.Video Abstract available (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A64) for more insights from the authors.
Authors: Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Francesca Ferrari; Courtney E Shell; Zachary C Thumser; Francesco Clemente; Ela B Plow; Christian Cipriani; Paul D Marasco Journal: Front Neurorobot Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Ronald A Bos; Claudia J W Haarman; Teun Stortelder; Kostas Nizamis; Just L Herder; Arno H A Stienen; Dick H Plettenburg Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.262