BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) are minimally invasive procedures that can be used to treat early rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy between ESD and TEM for the treatment of early rectal cancer. METHODS: Between July 2008 and August 2011, 24 patients with early rectal cancers were treated by ESD (11) or TEM (13) at the Cancer Institute of São Paulo University Medical School (São Paulo, Brazil). Data were analyzed retrospectively according to database and pathological reports, with respect to en bloc resection rate, local recurrence, complications, histological diagnosis, procedure time and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: En bloc resection rates with free margins were achieved in 81.8 % of patients in the ESD group and 84.6 % of patients in the TEM group (p = 0.40). Mean tumor size was 64.6 ± 57.9 mm in the ESD group and 43.9 ± 30.7 mm in the TEM group (p = 0.13). Two patients in the TEM group and one patient in the ESD group had a local recurrence. The mean procedure time was 133 ± 94.8 min in the ESD group and 150 ± 66.3 min in the TEM group (p = 0.69). Mean hospital stay was 3.8 ± 3.3 days in the ESD group and 4.08 ± 1.7 days in the TEM group (p = 0.81). LIMITATIONS: This was a non-randomized clinical trial with a small sample size and selection bias in treatment options. CONCLUSION: ESD and TEM are both safe and effective for the treatment of early rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) are minimally invasive procedures that can be used to treat early rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy between ESD and TEM for the treatment of early rectal cancer. METHODS: Between July 2008 and August 2011, 24 patients with early rectal cancers were treated by ESD (11) or TEM (13) at the Cancer Institute of São Paulo University Medical School (São Paulo, Brazil). Data were analyzed retrospectively according to database and pathological reports, with respect to en bloc resection rate, local recurrence, complications, histological diagnosis, procedure time and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: En bloc resection rates with free margins were achieved in 81.8 % of patients in the ESD group and 84.6 % of patients in the TEM group (p = 0.40). Mean tumor size was 64.6 ± 57.9 mm in the ESD group and 43.9 ± 30.7 mm in the TEM group (p = 0.13). Two patients in the TEM group and one patient in the ESD group had a local recurrence. The mean procedure time was 133 ± 94.8 min in the ESD group and 150 ± 66.3 min in the TEM group (p = 0.69). Mean hospital stay was 3.8 ± 3.3 days in the ESD group and 4.08 ± 1.7 days in the TEM group (p = 0.81). LIMITATIONS: This was a non-randomized clinical trial with a small sample size and selection bias in treatment options. CONCLUSION: ESD and TEM are both safe and effective for the treatment of early rectal cancer.
Authors: E J R de Graaf; J W A Burger; A L A van Ijsseldijk; G W M Tetteroo; I Dawson; W C J Hop Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Thomas R McCarty; Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi; Kelly E Hathorn; Christopher C Thompson; Hiroyuki Aihara Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: José Carlos Marín-Gabriel; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach; José Díaz-Tasende; Alberto Herreros de Tejada Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2016-01-25
Authors: Fernando A Angarita; Adina E Feinberg; Stanley M Feinberg; Robert H Riddell; J Andrea McCart Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.571