Literature DB >> 24231175

Culture related to road traffic safety: a comparison of eight countries using two conceptualizations of culture.

Trond Nordfjærn1, Özlem Şimşekoğlu, Torbjorn Rundmo.   

Abstract

The majority of previous cross-country studies of human factors relevant to traffic safety have not operationalized and measured culture. Also studies in this vein have mostly been carried out in Europe and the United States. The aim of the study was to examine country cluster differences, based on the Culture's Consequences framework, in road traffic risk perception, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour in samples from Norway, Russia, India, Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda, Turkey and Iran. An additional aim was to examine cluster differences in road traffic culture as symbol use and to investigate whether this theoretical cultural framework predicts risk perception, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour in the country clusters. The sample consisted of a total of 2418 individuals who were obtained by convenience sampling in the different countries. The countries segmented into four Culture's Consequences clusters; Norway, Russia and India, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Near East countries. The findings showed that Norwegians reported overall safer attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour than the remaining country clusters. Individuals in Africa reported the highest risk perception. The countries also differed substantially in road traffic culture as symbol use. Contrary to established cultural theory, prediction models revealed that cultural factors were stronger predictors of driver behaviour than of risk perception. Also, the social cognitive risk constructs (i.e. risk perception and attitudes) solely explained variance in driver behaviour in the Norwegian and Russia/India clusters. Previous empirical efforts, which aimed to demonstrate that culture is important for the risk perception criterion, may have focused on a criterion variable that is not strongly related to driver behaviour. Furthermore, countermeasures aimed to influence social cognition may have stronger applicability in countries with a more individualistic western cultural orientation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Cross-cultural; Culture as symbol use; Culture's consequences; Driver behaviour; Risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24231175     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of Behavior of Students as Pedestrian and Car Occupants in Relation to Traffic Laws in 2013, Gorgan, Iran; An Application of Health Belief Model.

Authors:  Hashem Heshmati; Nasser Behnampour; Golnaz Binaei; Samane Khajavai
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2014-07

2.  What Simon "knows" about cultural differences: The influence of cultural orientation and traffic directionality on spatial compatibility effects.

Authors:  Pamela Baess; Ullrich K H Ecker; Steve M J Janssen; Zheng Jin; Christina Bermeitinger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-09-30

3.  Factors affecting the exposure, vulnerability and emergency medical service capacity for victims of road traffic incidents in Kampala Metropolitan Area: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Joseph Kimuli Balikuddembe; Ali Ardalan; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Amir Nejati; Stephen Kasiima
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-07

4.  Taking a mixed-methods approach to collision investigation: AcciMap, STAMP-CAST and PCM.

Authors:  Omar Faruqe Hamim; Shahnewaz Hasanat-E-Rabbi; Mithun Debnath; Md Shamsul Hoque; Rich C McIlroy; Katherine L Plant; Neville A Stanton
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  The relative efficiency of Iranian's rural traffic police: a three-stage DEA model.

Authors:  Habibollah Rahimi; Hamid Soori; Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari; Seyed Abbas Motevalian; Adel Azar; Eskandar Momeni; Mehdi Javartani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.