Literature DB >> 24231117

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer--a real-world, prospective, observational French study: PRéOBS.

Charles-Marc Samama1, Léon Boubli2, Patrick Coloby3, Philippe Debourdeau4, Yves Gruel5, Christophe Mariette6, Dominique Mottier7, Pascal Rischmann8, Laurent Toubiana9, Annick Steib10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data on the epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery in real practice are limited. The primary objective of this observational study was to describe the thromboprophylactic strategy implemented in routine practice. The main secondary objective was to assess the incidence of outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to public or private hospitals for abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery were included between November 2009 and November 2010; endoscopic route for surgery was the only exclusion criterion. Study outcomes were recorded at hospital discharge and at routine follow-up (generally 9±3weeks).
RESULTS: 2380 patients (mean±SD age: 66.4±11.6years, women: 36.8%) admitted to hospital for abdominal (47.8%), urological (41%), or gynaecological (11.2%) cancer surgery were included in the analysis. Of these, 2179 had data available at study end. Perioperative antithrombotic prophylaxis, consisting mainly of low-molecular-weight heparin, was given to 99.5% of patients. At hospital discharge, thromboprophylaxis was continued in 91.7% of patients, 57.4% receiving a 4-6week prophylaxis. This management strategy was associated with an overall venous thromboembolic event rate of 1.9%, 34.7% of events occurring after discharge. Incidences of fatal bleeding, bleeding in a critical organ and bleeding necessitating re-intervention were 0.1%, 0.3% and 1.7%, respectively. Overall mortality was 1.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylaxis is routinely used in French patients undergoing major cancer surgery. For more than a third of patients, however, treatment duration did not comply with best-practice recommendations, which might explain the non-negligible rate of thromboembolic complications still observed in this patient population.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery; Epidemiology; Real-world observational study; Thromboprophylaxis; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24231117     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  4 in total

1.  Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after abdominopelvic cancer surgery: a retrospective review.

Authors:  M Laureano; M Ebraheem; M Crowther
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Effects of Long-Term Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin on Fractures and Bone Density in Non-Pregnant Adults: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Olga Gajic-Veljanoski; Chai W Phua; Prakesh S Shah; Angela M Cheung
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A Prospective Observational Study to Determine Rate of Thromboprophylaxis in Oncology Patients Undergoing Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Manish Verma
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-01

4.  Extended versus inpatient thromboprophylaxis with heparins following major open abdominopelvic surgery for malignancy: a systematic review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  B Heijkoop; S Nadi; D Spernat; G Kiroff
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.