Wieteke M Ploegstra1, Arend F Bos2, Nathalie K S de Vries3. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: wmploegstra@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Paediatrics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quality of general movements (GMs) is a widely used criterion to assess neurological dysfunction in young infants. It is unknown, however, whether the birth process influences the motor repertoire of healthy full term infants during the first week after birth. AIMS: To assess the quality of GMs and to determine the motor optimality score (OS) in healthy full term infants during the first week after birth and to evaluate the influence of the mode of delivery on GM quality. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three healthy full term infants born either vaginally or after caesarean section (CS) under spinal anaesthesia were video recorded in the first week after birth in order to assess GM quality and to determine OS with Prechtl's method. RESULTS: Abnormal GMs were observed mainly on the early recordings: 86% on the day of birth (day 0), 94% on day 1, and 68% on day 2. On days 5 to 7 (day 5-7) all GMs were normal (P<.001). The OSs increased significantly from median 12 on day 0 to 18 on day 5-7 (P<.001). Monotonously slow movements were frequently seen during the first days but not on day 5-7 (P<.001). GM quality and OS did not differ between infants born by vaginal delivery or after CS under spinal anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy full term infants often showed abnormal GM quality and lower OSs during the first week after birth, irrespective of the mode of delivery. GM quality normalised during subsequent days and was normal on day 5-7.
BACKGROUND: The quality of general movements (GMs) is a widely used criterion to assess neurological dysfunction in young infants. It is unknown, however, whether the birth process influences the motor repertoire of healthy full term infants during the first week after birth. AIMS: To assess the quality of GMs and to determine the motor optimality score (OS) in healthy full term infants during the first week after birth and to evaluate the influence of the mode of delivery on GM quality. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three healthy full term infants born either vaginally or after caesarean section (CS) under spinal anaesthesia were video recorded in the first week after birth in order to assess GM quality and to determine OS with Prechtl's method. RESULTS: Abnormal GMs were observed mainly on the early recordings: 86% on the day of birth (day 0), 94% on day 1, and 68% on day 2. On days 5 to 7 (day 5-7) all GMs were normal (P<.001). The OSs increased significantly from median 12 on day 0 to 18 on day 5-7 (P<.001). Monotonously slow movements were frequently seen during the first days but not on day 5-7 (P<.001). GM quality and OS did not differ between infants born by vaginal delivery or after CS under spinal anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy full term infants often showed abnormal GM quality and lower OSs during the first week after birth, irrespective of the mode of delivery. GM quality normalised during subsequent days and was normal on day 5-7.
Keywords:
BW; CS; ChFs; First week; GA; GMs; General movements; Healthy; LGA; Neonate; OS; PR; SGA; birth weight; caesarean section; chaotic features; general movements; gestational age; large for gestational age; optimality score; poor repertoire; small for gestational age
Authors: Dafne Herrero; Christa Einspieler; Carolina Y Panvequio Aizawa; Akmer Mutlu; Hong Yang; Alice Nogolová; Jasmin Pansy; Karin Nielsen-Saines; Peter B Marschik Journal: Res Dev Disabil Date: 2017-06-03
Authors: Christa Einspieler; Peter B Marschik; Jasmin Pansy; Anna Scheuchenegger; Magdalena Krieber; Hong Yang; Maria K Kornacka; Edyta Rowinska; Marina Soloveichick; Arend F Bos Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Loïs C Span; Nienke H van Dokkum; Anne-Greet Ravensbergen; Arend F Bos; Artur C Jaschke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 3.390