Literature DB >> 24229034

Assessment of the effectiveness of silver-coated dressing, chlorhexidine acetate (0.5%), citric acid (3%), and silver sulfadiazine (1%) for topical antibacterial effects against the multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infecting full-skin thickness burn wounds on rats.

Hakan Yabanoglu1, Ozgur Basaran, Cem Aydogan, Ozlem Kurt Azap, Feza Karakayali, Gokhan Moray.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of four different topical antimicrobial dressings on a multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa contaminated full-thickness burn wound rat model. A total of 40 adult male Wistar albino rats were used. The control group (group 1), silver sulfadiazine (1%) group 2, chlorhexidine acetate (0.5%) group 3, citric acid (3%) group 4, and silver-coated dressing group 5 were compared to assess the antibacterial effects of a daily application to a 30% full-skin thickness burn wound seeded 10 minutes earlier with 10(8) CFU (colony forming unit)/0.5 mL of a multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. Five groups (1 control group and 4 treatment groups) were compared. The administration of third-degree burns to all rats was confirmed based on histopathologic data. The tissue cultures from groups 2 and 5 exhibited significant differences compared to those of the other 3 groups, whereas no significant differences were observed between groups 1, 3, and 4. The effectiveness of the treatments was as follows: 1% silver sulfadiazine > silver-coated dressing > 3% citric acid > 0.5% chlorhexidine acetate > control group. Our results supported the efficacy of topical therapy by silver sulfadiazine and silver-coated dressing on infections caused by multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas spp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24229034      PMCID: PMC3829074          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00017.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  23 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Antimicrobial resistance in European isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. European SENTRY Participants.

Authors:  A C Fluit; J Verhoef; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare?

Authors:  David M Livermore
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  The use of biopsies in burn patient care.

Authors:  B A Pruitt; F D Foley
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  [Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenicity, prevention and therapeutic approaches].

Authors:  P Kujath; C Hügelschäffer
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 0.942

6.  Endemicity, molecular diversity and colonisation routes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units.

Authors:  X Bertrand; M Thouverez; D Talon; A Boillot; G Capellier; C Floriot; J P Hélias
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Aerobic bacterial isolates from burn wound infections and their antibiograms--a five-year study.

Authors:  N Agnihotri; V Gupta; R M Joshi
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Frequency of Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotypes in burn wound infections and their resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  Hamid Karimi Estahbanati; Parnian Pour Kashani; Fahimeh Ghanaatpisheh
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  An in vitro study of the anti-microbial efficacy of a 1% silver sulphadiazine and 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate cream, 1% silver sulphadiazine cream and a silver coated dressing.

Authors:  John F Fraser; Jan Bodman; Ruth Sturgess; Joan Faoagali; Roy M Kimble
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.744

10.  Three-year review of bacteriological profile and antibiogram of burn wound isolates in Van, Turkey.

Authors:  Yasemin Bayram; Mehmet Parlak; Cenk Aypak; Irfan Bayram
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Bath Wipes After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Margie Kjellin; Amr Qudeimat; Emily Browne; Dinesh Keerthi; Anusha Sunkara; Guolian Kang; Alicia Winfield; Mary Anne Giannini; Gabriela Maron; Randall Hayden; Wing Leung; Brandon Triplett; Ashok Srinivasan
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Calcium-silicate mesoporous nanoparticles loaded with chlorhexidine for both anti- Enterococcus faecalis and mineralization properties.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Yanyun Li; Qing Sun; Tengjiao Ma; Bing Fan
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 3.  Antimicrobial stewardship of antiseptics that are pertinent to wounds: the need for a united approach.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Maillard; Günter Kampf; Rose Cooper
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-03-25

Review 4.  Biogenic Nanosilver against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria (MDRB).

Authors:  Caio H N Barros; Stephanie Fulaz; Danijela Stanisic; Ljubica Tasic
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-02

5.  Antimicrobial efficacy of aqueous ozone in combination with short chain fatty acid buffers.

Authors:  Holly C Britton; Michael Draper; James E Talmadge
Journal:  Infect Prev Pract       Date:  2019-12-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.