Literature DB >> 24228752

Can contraction patterns predict neonatal outcomes?

Heather A Frey1, Methodius G Tuuli, Kimberly A Roehl, Anthony O Odibo, George A Macones, Alison G Cahill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between contraction patterns in labor and neonatal outcomes.
METHODS: A nested case-control study within a consecutive term birth cohort included women in labor with intrauterine pressure catheters (IUPCs) who reached the second stage. Cases were women delivering neonates with composite morbidity: special care or intensive care unit admission, umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.1 or 5-min Apgar < 7. The control group delivered without any components of the composite morbidity. Contraction frequency, duration, relaxation time, Montevideo units (MVUs) and baseline tone in the last 30 min prior to delivery were compared. We used logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders and receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the ability of contraction parameters to predict adverse neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 183 cases of adverse neonatal outcomes and 2172 controls without the composite outcome. Contraction duration, relaxation time, MVUs and baseline tone did not significantly differ between the groups. Tachysystole was more common in women with the adverse neonatal outcome (21% versus 15%, p = 0.01). A model including tachysystole, oxytocin use and nulliparity did not adequately predict the adverse outcome (AUC = 0.61).
CONCLUSIONS: Although tachysystole is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, uterine activity cannot be used to predict neonatal outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acidosis; apgar; tachysystole; umbilical artery pH; uterine activity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24228752      PMCID: PMC4059778          DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.866645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  18 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  Thomas A Lasko; Jui G Bhagwat; Kelly H Zou; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Umbilical cord pH and base excess values in relation to adverse outcome events for infants delivering at term.

Authors:  Rahi Victory; Deborah Penava; Orlando Da Silva; Renato Natale; Bryan Richardson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The association of Apgar score with subsequent death and cerebral palsy: A population-based study in term infants.

Authors:  D Moster; R T Lie; L M Irgens; T Bjerkedal; T Markestad
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 7.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Z Alfirevic; D Devane; G M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

8.  Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?

Authors:  Robert D Stewart; April T Bleich; Julie Y Lo; James M Alexander; Donald D McIntire; Kenneth J Leveno
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Uterine contraction pressures with oxytocin induction/augmentation.

Authors:  J C Hauth; G D Hankins; L C Gilstrap; D M Strickland; P Vance
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Pushing in labor: performance and not endurance.

Authors:  Catalin S Buhimschi; Irina A Buhimschi; Andrew M Malinow; Jerome N Kopelman; Carl P Weiner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intrapartum uterine activity and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam J Reynolds; Michael P Geary; Breda C Hayes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.