Katherine C Smith1, Samantha Cukier, David H Jernigan. 1. Katherine C. Smith, Samantha Cukier, and David H. Jernigan are with the Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We analyzed beer, spirits, and alcopop magazine advertisements to determine adherence to federal and voluntary advertising standards. We assessed the efficacy of these standards in curtailing potentially damaging content and protecting public health. METHODS: We obtained data from a content analysis of a census of 1795 unique advertising creatives for beer, spirits, and alcopops placed in nationally available magazines between 2008 and 2010. We coded creatives for manifest content and adherence to federal regulations and industry codes. RESULTS: Advertisements largely adhered to existing regulations and codes. We assessed only 23 ads as noncompliant with federal regulations and 38 with industry codes. Content consistent with the codes was, however, often culturally positive in terms of aspirational depictions. In addition, creatives included degrading and sexualized images, promoted risky behavior, and made health claims associated with low-calorie content. CONCLUSIONS: Existing codes and regulations are largely followed regarding content but do not adequately protect against content that promotes unhealthy and irresponsible consumption and degrades potentially vulnerable populations in its depictions. Our findings suggest further limitations and enhanced federal oversight may be necessary to protect public health.
OBJECTIVES: We analyzed beer, spirits, and alcopop magazine advertisements to determine adherence to federal and voluntary advertising standards. We assessed the efficacy of these standards in curtailing potentially damaging content and protecting public health. METHODS: We obtained data from a content analysis of a census of 1795 unique advertising creatives for beer, spirits, and alcopops placed in nationally available magazines between 2008 and 2010. We coded creatives for manifest content and adherence to federal regulations and industry codes. RESULTS: Advertisements largely adhered to existing regulations and codes. We assessed only 23 ads as noncompliant with federal regulations and 38 with industry codes. Content consistent with the codes was, however, often culturally positive in terms of aspirational depictions. In addition, creatives included degrading and sexualized images, promoted risky behavior, and made health claims associated with low-calorie content. CONCLUSIONS: Existing codes and regulations are largely followed regarding content but do not adequately protect against content that promotes unhealthy and irresponsible consumption and degrades potentially vulnerable populations in its depictions. Our findings suggest further limitations and enhanced federal oversight may be necessary to protect public health.
Authors: Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Daryl Cioffi; Lucero Leon-Chi; Timothy S Naimi; Alisa A Padon; David H Jernigan; Ziming Xuan Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Samantha Cukier; Ashley Wettlaufer; Kristina Jackson; Silvia Minozzi; Bruce D Bartholow; Michael L Stoolmiller; James D Sargent Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-13
Authors: Matthis Morgenstern; Franziska Schoeppe; Julie Campbell; Marloes W G Braam; Michael Stoolmiller; James D Sargent Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Dawn M Holman; Mary C White; Meredith L Shoemaker; Greta M Massetti; Mary C Puckett; Claire D Brindis Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Alexander B Barker; Kathy Whittamore; John Britton; Rachael L Murray; Jo Cranwell Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.341