Literature DB >> 24228145

Comparison of spread of subarachnoid sensory block and incidence of hypotension in early and late second trimester of pregnancy.

Mi Hyeon Lee1, Hee Jeong Son, Sang Hoon Lee, Jeong-Hyun Lee, Mi Hwa Chung, Young Ryong Choi, Eun Mi Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstetric or non-obstetric surgery can be performed in pregnant women during the second trimester. We evaluated maximal sensory block level (MSBL), and other sensory block characteristics after spinal anesthesia in early and late second trimester pregnant women.
METHODS: Forty-four pregnant women scheduled for cervical cerclage under spinal anesthesia in the early second trimester (Group E) or in the late second trimester (Group L) were enrolled in this study. Spinal anesthesia was performed at the L3/4 and 7 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected into the subarachnoid space. Hemodynamic variables, incidence of nausea/vomiting, ephedrine dose, and sensory block were recorded every 2.5 min during the first 15 min and 20 min after the injection. The MSBL, the time at which MSBL was achieved, and the time to the two-segment regression of the sensory level were also recorded.
RESULTS: The maximum number of segments blocked was significantly greater in the Group L than in the Group E. The incidence of nausea/vomiting and hypotension, and dose of administrated ephedrine were significantly higher in the Group L than in the Group E. The mean arterial pressure during the 15 min after subarachnoid injection was significantly lower compared to the baseline value in the Group L.
CONCLUSIONS: The MSBL of spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 7 mg were T9 in the early and T5 in the late second trimester groups. Pregnant women in the late second trimester exhibited increased incidence of hypotension and need for ephedrine than women in the early second trimester.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bupivacaine; Pregnancy; Second trimester

Year:  2013        PMID: 24228145      PMCID: PMC3822024          DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol        ISSN: 2005-6419


  14 in total

1.  The fiberscopic findings of the epidural space in pregnant women.

Authors:  T Igarashi; Y Hirabayashi; R Shimizu; K Saitoh; H Fukuda; H Suzuki
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid density, velocity, and volume on extent and duration of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Hideyuki Higuchi; Jyun-ichi Hirata; Yushi Adachi; Tomiei Kazama
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Spinal anesthesia and lumbar lordosis.

Authors:  M R Logan; G B Drummond
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The influence of inferior vena cava compression on the level of spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  D L Barclay; O J Renegar; E W Nelson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1968-07-15       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Distribution of local anesthetic solutions within the subarachnoid space.

Authors:  N M Greene
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Anatomical configuration of the spinal column in the supine position. II. Comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Authors:  Y Hirabayashi; R Shimizu; H Fukuda; K Saitoh; M Furuse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Spread of epidural analgesia in early pregnancy.

Authors:  L Fagraeus; B J Urban; P R Bromage
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Cerebrospinal fluid progesterone in pregnant women.

Authors:  Y Hirabayashi; R Shimizu; K Saitoh; H Fukuda
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Spread of subarachnoid sensory block with hyperbaric bupivacaine in second trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Guie Y Lee; Chi H Kim; Rack K Chung; Jong I Han; Dong Y Kim
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid progesterone concentrations in pregnant and nonpregnant women.

Authors:  S Datta; R J Hurley; J S Naulty; P Stern; D H Lambert; M Concepcion; D Tulchinsky; J B Weiss; G W Ostheimer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.