Literature DB >> 24228056

The "hidden diversity" of medicinal plants in northeastern Brazil: diagnosis and prospects for conservation and biological prospecting.

Deyvson Rodrigues Cavalcanti1, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque.   

Abstract

Increases in ethnobotanical studies and knowledge in recent decades have led to a greater and more accurate interpretation of the overall patterns related to the use of medicinal plants, allowing for a clear identification of some ecological and cultural phenomena. "Hidden diversity" of medicinal plants refers in the present study to the existence of several species of medicinal plants known by the same vernacular name in a given region. Although this phenomenon has previously been observed in a localized and sporadic manner, its full dimensions have not yet been established. In the present study, we sought to assess the hidden diversity of medicinal plants in northeastern Brazil based on the ethnospecies catalogued by local studies. The results indicate that there are an average of at least 2.78 different species per cataloged ethnospecies in the region. Phylogenetic proximity and its attendant morphological similarity favor the interchangeable use of these species, resulting in serious ecological and sanitary implications as well as a wide range of options for conservation and bioprospecting.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24228056      PMCID: PMC3817947          DOI: 10.1155/2013/102714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med        ISSN: 1741-427X            Impact factor:   2.629


1. Introduction

Medicinal plants are freely circulated in Brazil, particularly in informal trade settings where several types of plants are marketed for a wide range of illnesses (see [1]). Limited access to specialty medicine and an increasing interest in the so-called natural treatments account for the rapid increase of the trade in such products in Brazil [2]. The most important vendors of medicinal plants are located in urban centers, namely, in fairs and public markets, where consumers have easy access to a wide variety of medicinal plant species together with the corresponding therapeutic indications [3]. More specifically, the regional public markets act as spaces representative of the cultural production and biological diversity of a given area [1, 4] and as centers where the empirical knowledge retained in different areas and with different origins is aggregated, conserved, and spread. Thus, the regional public markets are the pillars of a complex, open, and dynamic system of knowledge [1]. Although promising for the biological prospecting of novel drugs and pharmaceutical products, actual research at such markets has some limitations, as the identity of the vast majority of the plant species traded there cannot be safely established by means of conventional methods [1, 5–7]. In contrast with community-based ethnobotanical surveys, where the investigated resources are directly accessible in loco [8-11], research at markets and fairs is much more complex, as a significant proportion of the plant products offered to the consumers are uncharacteristic or lack the elements required for accurate taxonomic identification (see [1, 5, 6]). As a rule, only parts of the plants are sold, to wit, the ones allegedly containing the active therapeutic components, such as barks, roots, seeds, flowers, and leaves, which are sometimes dehydrated, chopped, and/or ground. As a result, it becomes quite easy to mix or mistake a similar species with or for another. Several authors have previously expressed such concerns and proposed some methodological solutions to the problem [1, 12]. Various palliative techniques have been suggested for cataloging all medicinal plants available to the consumers at public markets, some of which are quite specialized and expensive [13-15], whereas others are feasible but not always viable [16, 17]. In addition to morphological similarities between species, another factor that makes it difficult to interpret the ethnobotanical data collected at public markets is the fact that multiple plants species are frequently known by the same vernacular name. Such events of semantic correspondence in ethnobotanical studies were initially detected by several authors [18-21] and then properly systematized by Berlin [22] in a study that sought to determine the relationships between the biological and traditional classification systems, thus establishing the grounds of ethnotaxonomy. Within that ethnotaxonomic approach, Berlin [22, 23] established the notion of underdifferentiation to define the semantic correspondence between different species that share a vernacular name, of which two types were described. Underdifferentiation type 1 occurs when the species involved belong to the same genus, and type 2 occurs when they belong to different genera. When only one species corresponds to a given ethnospecies, correspondence is defined as one-to-one or biunivocal [22, 23]. Several studies of local communities have employed these notions to identify similar patterns of semantic correspondence between different species [24-28]. The species subjected to underdifferentiation have been termed ethnohomonyms. Although quite well adjusted to the local systems, such correspondences tend to overlap and become complex when different cultural origins become somehow intertwined [29, 30]. The overlapping of homonym ethnospecies makes the understanding of ethnobotanical data originating in environments where complex cultural networks are established even more difficult, as is the case with ethnobotanical studies at regional public markets (see [6]). We define here the “hidden diversity” of medicinal plants as the set of different homonym ethnospecies “hidden” under the same vernacular name. We coined the term “hidden diversity” based on the analogy with the notion of a “hidden harvest,” which denotes the progressive and unofficially documented appropriation of the plant biodiversity in a given area [31, 32]. According to Krog et al. [6] the impossibility of distinguishing among homonym ethnospecies is one of the major limitations to the advancement of ethnobotanical research in public markets, particularly in the case of ethnopharmacological studies of plant conservation and bioprospection. Although that phenomenon has previously been detected in a localized and sporadic manner, its full dimensions have not yet been established. It is safe to assume that in Brazil, as a function of the plant biodiversity, environmental diversity, and multicultural and ethnic composition of the country [33], the number of homonym ethnospecies and consequently also the phenomenon of hidden diversity of medicinal plants is much more comprehensive and significant than suggested from the few occurrences recorded in the scientific literature. In the present study, we sought (1) to measure the hidden diversity, that is, the number of medicinal plant species subsumed under the same common name in the Brazilian northeast region; (2) to establish the different types of underdifferentiation of homonym ethnospecies; and (3) to assess the influence of biological diversity on the number of homonym ethnospecies. Finally, we sought to indicate some of the possible implications for conservation and biological prospecting. Assuming that the variety of homonym ethnospecies in a given region depends on the region's biodiversity, one might expect the following: (1) for the variation in the number of homonym ethnospecies to be directly proportional to the size of the sampled area, as larger areas theoretically include a wider variety of environments, and consequently, also greater biological diversity and (2) that a significant number of the homonym ethnospecies should be representative of the native flora compared to the group of species with one-to-one correspondence.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterization of the Study Area

The northeast region of Brazil includes nine federal units and represents a total area of 1,558,196 km2, which corresponds to 18% of the country's territory. It is located in an intertropical zone limited by the Atlantic Ocean to the east and north, the Amazonian rainforest to the northwest, and the Cerrado (Brazilian savannah) domain to the west and southwest [34]. The vegetation is mainly xerophytic, being the Caatinga (Brazilian xeric shrubland), a highly peculiar biome with a high degree of endemism [35-37]. Atlantic ombrophilous forest predominates in the coastal area. Currently, this forest is one of the most seriously threatened biomes in the world, and only 5% of its original area remains [38, 39]. Enclaves of Cerrado and rainforest are widely present as areas of disjunct vegetation [40-43], making the Brazilian northeast region a strategic area from the perspective of global richness and biological diversity [44, 45]. From the demographic point of view, the total population of the northeast region comprises approximately 49 million inhabitants, primarily distributed along the coastal area where most state capitals and major cities are located, which together host approximately 40% of the population [34]. The cultural diversity of the northeast region is high due to the ethnic miscegenation resulting from the colonization of Brazil [46, 47], and the population includes Europeans, mostly Portuguese and Dutch, black slaves from Africa, and the various indigenous peoples. In addition, it is worth observing that in the last ten years, the economic growth of the region was significantly higher than the national average [34].

2.2. Data Survey

Six of the nine northeastern states were included in the analysis based on the need to survey the widest possible diversity of cultural representations and environments and the need to take into account the logistics of access and permanence at the study sites. For the purposes of the present study, we assumed that the expression of the regional culture is more diversified at the state capitals because they exhibit the largest population density, including immigrants from other states and/or the inland cities. The states and corresponding capitals sampled were as follows: Maranhão/São Luiz, Ceará/Fortaleza, Paraíba/João Pessoa, Pernambuco/Recife, Alagoas/Maceió, and Sergipe/Aracaju. The primary site of medicinal plant trade in each state capital was identified, and thus the following markets were selected: the Mercado Central (Central Market) in São Luiz/MA, Mercado de São Sebastião (St. Sebastian Market) in Fortaleza/CE, Mercado Central in João Pessoa/PB, Mercado São José (St. Joseph Market) in Recife/PE, Mercado da Produção (Production Market) in Maceió/AL, and Mercado Albano Franco (Albano Franco Market) in Aracaju/SE. Following an initial exploratory visit, an appointment was made for data collection. The plant vendors at each selected market were informed as to the nature of the study and invited to participate. Some vendors refused immediately, and others initially agreed and then went back on their original agreement. As a result, a total of 22 respondents were interviewed and provided a representative sample of the vernacular names of the plants traded in the region. In the state of Pernambuco, the ethnobotanical studies in public markets are already more advanced. Albuquerque and colleagues [1] previously found a significant decrease in the availability of plant vendors in this state based on only two samples obtained over an eight-year period. The in situ observations and data collected for the present study suggest that this decrease in availability may represent a general trend that can be explained by several factors. For instance, the lack of regulation and control of the sector in regards to health and ecological aspects may generate mistrust and insecurity among vendors. The vendors may also experience a lack of return research or “benefits" that would otherwise entice them to be informants. In addition, the harsh economic conditions of the country have removed a significant number of vendors from the market, and unrelenting derogatory campaigns have undermined the informal trade markets in the media. Vendors in the informal trade markets also experience increasing competition with food stores, which are common in large urban centers and usually have better infrastructure, availability, and sanitary conditions. There is also a lack of interest in new generations to continue the family traditions of using and trading medicinal plants. After the study was explained, the respondents freely signed an informed consent form. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pernambuco (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco—UFPE) no. 0039.0.172.0000-10, FR (Folha de Rosto—Title Page) 3139660. Although some authors [1] have reported that several terms are used to describe vendors of medicinal plants, eventually including hierarchical criteria, in the present study, we used the generic term “herbalist” (locally known as “erveiro”) to allude to any type of vendor of medicinal plants. The term ethnospecies is used in the present study to allude to the common or vernacular names given to the medicinal plants. Using a field notebook, we made records of the catalogs of plants traded by the herbalists as mentioned in semistructured interviews [48]. For the purposes of the study, the plants available in stock at the time of the study as well as those traded in the previous 12 months were taken into consideration. The common names of the plants were recorded as spelled by the respondents.

2.3. Data Analysis

The ethnobotanical data supplied by the herbalists in the various studied northeastern states were transcribed and entered in digital spreadsheets using MS Excel 2003 software, thus creating a Market Relational Database (MRD). The MRD was used to map the geographical distributions of the ethnospecies across the Brazilian northeast region and identify the most frequently occurring ones. In parallel, an Ethnobotanical Survey Database (ESD) was created and populated. For that purpose, 55 ethnobotanical surveys of the northeastern states were identified, and the listed species and ethnospecies were entered in the ESD. The plants not identified at the species level were not included. Only relevant studies were selected: most (45) were published in major scientific journals, seven were Master's dissertations, one was a doctoral thesis, one a book, and one the Development Plan of a major Brazilian university (Federal University of Bahia—Universidade Federal da Bahia, UFBA). The data entered in both databases (MRD and ESD) were then crosschecked to produce a detailed list of the ethnospecies mentioned both in the ethnobotanical surveys and by the respondents in our study, with the corresponding species. This step allowed for the identification of the homonym species and their clustering around the corresponding ethnospecies. We selected a sample corresponding to 40% of the ethnospecies included in both databases (MRD and ESD) based on their frequency in the ethnobotanical surveys. Thus, only the 165 most frequent ethnospecies out of a total of 406 listed in the ethnobotanical surveys were selected for analysis. The sampling criteria used were based on two assumptions: (1) ethnobotanical research is still incipient in most of the northeast region, and thus, infrequent ethnospecies might suggest a merely temporary pattern of semantic correspondence, consequently masking the results, the number of one-to-one correspondences in particular and (2) the ethnospecies most frequently mentioned in the regional ethnobotanical surveys might represent the patterns of semantic correspondence in a more unequivocal and reliable manner. The corresponding species were allocated to three groups: one comprised the species with one-to-one correspondences, the second, the homonym ethnospecies with type 1 underdifferentiation, and the third, the homonym ethnospecies with type 2 underdifferentiation, according to Berlin's [23] classification. The corresponding species were subjected to synonym analysis; the names that are currently valid were duly recorded based on the List of Species of the Brazilian Flora 2012 [49] and the database of the Missouri Botanical Garden [50], which were also used to establish the biogeographic status of each species to classify them as native or exotic. To assess whether underdifferentiation (sensu Berlin [23]), expressed as the number of homonym ethnospecies, varies as a function of the biological diversity of a given area, we compared the results corresponding to the northeast region with a geographically narrower sample, based on the assumption that the larger the area, the wider the environmental variety, and thus, the more diversified the flora. That narrower sample was represented by the state of Pernambuco, which is the northeastern state most thoroughly studied from an ethnobotanical perspective. The numbers of homonym ethnospecies and one-to-one correspondences of the northeast region were compared to those of Pernambuco. The frequency of species in the respective categories of semantic correspondence (i.e., one-to-one and underdifferentiation) was analyzed by means of G tests [51] as were the percentages of native and exotic species in each group.

3. Results

The ethnospecies (n = 165) sampled based on the data collected at the visited markets exhibited correspondence with 459 species, corresponding to 228 genera and 90 families (Table 1). The ratio of species to ethnospecies was 2.78. From the total number of analyzed ethnospecies, only 41 (25%) exhibited one-to-one correspondence, whereas 124 (75%) exhibited underdifferentiation and correspondence to 418 species. Approximately 62% of the homonym ethnospecies exhibited two or three corresponding species, although in some cases, a single ethnospecies included up to nine corresponding homonym species, as, for example, “quebra-pedra” (stonebreaker) (Table 1).
Table 1

Ethnospecies marketed in the Northeast Brazil and the corresponding species cataloged in the scientific literature.

Vernacular nameFamilyScientific name in the original sourceValid scientific nameOriginLiteratureState
AroeiraAnacardiaceae Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão Myracrodruon urundeuva AllemãoN[1, 3, 9, 5278]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi Schinus terebinthifolius RaddiN[1, 11, 65, 7984]PE, RN, BA

CajáAnacardiaceae Spondias mombin  L. Spondias lutea  L. Spondias mombin  L.N[56, 57, 63, 67, 76, 82, 8587]PE, PB, PI, BA

Abre CaminhoFabaceae Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth. Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth.N[88]PB
Schizaeaceae Lygodium venustum Sw. Lygodium venustum Sw.N[1, 65]PE
Lygodium  volubile Sw. Lygodium  volubile Sw.N[1, 65]PE

Açoita cavaloTiliaceae Luehea divaricata Mart. Luehea divaricata Mart.N[66, 68]MA
Luehea ochrophylla Mart. Luehea ochrophylla Mart.N[89]PB
Luehea grandiflora Mart. Luehea grandiflora Mart.N[61, 68]MA
Luehea speciosa Willd.
Luehea candicans Mart. Luehea candicans Mart.N[57]PI

AcônitoAmaranthaceae Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) Pedersen Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) PedersenN[56, 65]PE
Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) KuntzeN[77]PB

AmburanaFabaceae Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A. C. Sm. Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A. C. Sm. N[6870, 78, 79]PB, CE, MA, BA
Burseraceae Commiphora leptophloeos (Mart.) J. B. Gillett Commiphora leptophloeos (Mart.) J. B. GillettN[1, 3, 6264, 70, 71, 73, 76, 80, 88]PE, PB, RN, BA
Bursera leptophloeos Mart.

CumaruFabaceae Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A. C. Sm. Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A. C. Sm. N[3, 52, 53, 55, 59, 60, 62, 67, 7072, 76, 77]PE, PB, CE, RN
Torresea cearensis Allemão
Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd. Dipteryx odorata (Aubl.) Willd.N[81]RN

AngelicaRubiaceae Guettarda platypoda DC. Guettarda platypoda DC.N[56, 89]PE, PB
Guettarda angelica Mart.  ex  Mull. Arg. Guettarda angelica Mart.  ex  Mull. Arg. N[90]RN

AraticumAnnonaceae Annona crassiflora Mart. Annona crassiflora Mart.N[85]PB
Annona coriacea Mart. Annona coriacea Mart.N[78, 91]PB, CE

AngicoFabaceae Anadenanthera colubrina (Vell.) Brenan Anadenanthera colubrina (Vell.) BrenanN[3, 11, 5254, 56, 59, 60, 6264, 67, 69, 70, 7274, 7680, 85, 88, 9294]PE, PB, CE, PI, RN, BA
Anadenanthera macrocarpa (Vell.) Brenan
Piptadenia colubrina (Vell.) Benth.

Assa-peixeAsteraceae Vernonia polyanthes (Spreng.) Less. Vernonanthura phosphorica (Vell.) H. Rob.N[79]BA
Vernonia scabra Pers. Vernonanthura brasiliana (L.) H. Rob.N[60]CE
Vernonia ferruginea Less. Vernonanthura ferruginea (Less.) H. Rob.N[82]BA
Gochnatia velutina (Bong.) Cabrera Gochnatia velutina (Bong.) CabreraN[79]BA
Verbesina macrophylla (Mull.) S. F. Blake Verbesina macrophylla (Mull.) S. F. BlakeN[83]BA
Euphorbiaceae Acalypha multicaulis Mull. Arg. Acalypha multicaulis Mull. Arg.N[95]SE

Balaio de veioAsteraceae Conocliniopsis prasiifolia (DC.) R. M. King and H. Rob. Conocliniopsis prasiifolia (DC.) R. M. King and H. Rob.N[58, 95, 96]SE
Lourteigia ballotifolia (Kunth) R. M. King and H. Rob.
Centratherum punctatum Cass. Centratherum punctatum Cass. N[82]BA
Ageratum conyzoides  L. Ageratum conyzoides  L.N[96]SE
Chrysobalanaceae Hirtella ciliata Mart. and Zucc. Hirtella ciliata Mart. and Zucc.N[78]CE

Batata de PurgaConvolvulaceae Operculina alata Urb. Operculina alata Urb.N[11, 56, 66, 92]PE, CE, MA
Operculina convolvulus Silva Manso Operculina macrocarpa (L.) Urb.N[9, 11, 5759, 66, 94, 97]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, RN
Operculina macrocarpa (L.) Urb.
Ipomoea purga (Wender.) Hayne Ipomoea dumosa (Benth.) L. O. WilliamsE[68]MA
Operculina hamiltonii (G. Don) D. F. Austin and Staples Operculina hamiltonii (G. Don) D. F. Austin and StaplesN[72, 88]PB

Burdão develhoFabaceae Pithecellobium saman (Jacq.) Benth. Samanea saman (Jacq.) Merr.E[56, 61]PE, MA
Samanea tubulosa (Benth.) Barneby and J. W. Grimes Samanea tubulosa (Benth.) Barneby and J. W. GrimesN[86]PB
Albizia polycephala (Benth.) Killip Albizia polycephala (Benth.) KillipN[85]PB

CanafístulaFabaceae Senna spectabilis (DC.) H. S. Irwin and Barneby Senna spectabilis (DC.) H. S. Irwin and BarnebyN[3, 60, 67, 70, 75, 77, 90]PE, PB, CE, RN
Senna martiana (Benth.) H. S. Irwin and Barneby Senna martiana (Benth.) H. S. Irwin and BarnebyN[75]PE
Albizia inundata (Mart.) Barneby and J. W. Grimes Albizia inundata (Mart.) Barneby and J. W. GrimesN[73]PE
Peltophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taub. Peltophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taub.N[82]BA

CapebaBegoniaceae Begonia vitifolia Schott Begonia reniformis Dryand.N[1, 11, 56, 65, 94]PE
Begonia reniformis Dryand.
Begonia huberi C. DC.
Piperaceae Pothomorphe peltata (L.) Miq. Piper peltatum  L.N[67]BA
Piper marginatum Jacq. Piper marginatum Jacq.N[53]PE
Piper umbellatum  L. Piper umbellatum  L.N[84]BA

MuriciMalpighiaceae Byrsonima sericea DC. Byrsonima sericea DC.N[11, 56, 63, 82, 86, 87, 89, 98]PE, PB, CE, PI, BA
Byrsonima verbascifolia (L.) DC. Byrsonima verbascifolia (L.) DC.N[98]CE
Byrsonima coccolobifolia Kunth Byrsonima coccolobifolia KunthN[98]CE
Byrsonima gardneriana A. Juss. Byrsonima gardneriana A. Juss.N[74, 85]PB, PI
Byrsonima correifolia A. Juss. Byrsonima correifolia A. Juss.N[57]PI

MulunguFabaceae Erythrina velutina Willd. Erythrina velutina Willd.N[1, 3, 56, 59, 60, 63, 67, 7173, 7577, 86, 88, 89, 93, 94, 97]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN

MuçambêCleomaceae Cleome hassleriana Chodat Tarenaya hassleriana (Chodat) IltisN[94]PE
Cleome spinosa Jacq. Tarenaya spinosa (Jacq.) Raf.N[3, 9, 56, 57, 59, 65, 71, 72, 75, 92, 93]PE, PB, CE, PI, RN

MororóFabaceae Bauhinia cheilantha (Bong.) Steud. Bauhinia cheilantha (Bong.) Steud.N[3, 58, 60, 6264, 7173, 7578, 85, 90, 95, 99]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN
Bauhinia forficata Link Bauhinia forficata LinkN[57, 68, 81, 93]PE, MA, RN
Bauhinia subclavata Benth. Bauhinia subclavata Benth.N[80]BA
Bauhinia smilacifolia Burch. ex Benth. Bauhinia smilacifolia Burch. ex Benth.N[90]RN
Bauhinia outimouta Aubl. Phanera outimouta (Aubl.) L. P. QueirozN[78]CE
Bauhinia acuruana Moric. Bauhinia acuruana Moric.N[74]PI
Bauhinia ungulata  L. Bauhinia ungulata  L.N[55]CE

PiquiCaryocaraceae Caryocar brasiliense Cambess. Caryocar brasiliense Cambess.N[61, 66, 68]MA
Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. Caryocar coriaceum Wittm.N[78, 92, 98]CE

Quebra pedraEuphorbiaceae Phyllanthus niruri  L. Phyllanthus niruri  L.N[1, 11, 57, 59, 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 71, 75, 84, 90, 99]PE, PB, PI, MA, RN, BA
Phyllanthus amarus Schumach. and Thonn. Phyllanthus amarus Schumach. and Thonn.N[9, 52, 53, 55, 56, 63, 72, 76, 9294]PE, PB, CE
Phyllanthus tenellus Roxb. Phyllanthus tenellus Roxb. N[79, 83]BA
Phyllanthus corcovadensis Mull. Arg.
Euphorbia hyssopifolia  L. Euphorbia hyssopifolia  L.N[75, 95]PE, SE
Chamaesyce hyssopifolia (L.) Small
Euphorbia thymifolia  L. Euphorbia thymifolia  L.N[56]PE
Euphorbia prostrata Aiton Euphorbia prostrata AitonN[75]PE
Phyllanthus flaviflorus (K. Schum. and Lauterb.) Airy Shaw Phyllanthus flaviflorus (K. Schum. and Lauterb.) Airy ShawE[69]BA
Phyllanthus urinaria  L. Phyllanthus urinaria  L.E[78]CE
Oxalidaceae Oxalis divaricata Mart. ex Zucc. Oxalis divaricata Mart. ex Zucc. N[58]SE

SabugueiroAdoxaceae Sambucus australis Cham. and Schltdl. Sambucus australis Cham. and Schltdl.N[9, 11, 56, 78, 81, 83, 84, 93, 94, 100]PE, PB, CE, RN, BA
Sambucus racemosa  L. Sambucus racemosa  L.E[69]BA
Sambucus nigra  L. Sambucus nigra  L.E[1, 11, 65, 67, 76, 79, 92, 99]PE, CE, RN, BA

FedegosoBoraginaceae Heliotropium indicum  L. Heliotropium indicum  L.N[1, 11, 52, 55, 56, 62, 63, 71, 75, 76, 85, 8890, 92, 94]PE, PB, CE, RN
Heliotropium elongatum Hoffm. ex Roem. and Schult. Heliotropium elongatum Hoffm. ex Roem. and Schult.N[3, 53, 59, 72]PE, PB, RN
Heliotropium procumbens Mill. Heliotropium procumbens Mill.E[60]CE
Fabaceae Senna occidentalis (L.) Link Senna occidentalis (L.) LinkN[57, 67, 69, 80, 83, 84, 88, 95]PB, SE, PI, BA
Senna uniflora (Mill.) H. S. Irwin and Barneby Senna uniflora (Mill.) H. S. Irwin and BarnebyN[66]MA

FavelaEuphorbiaceae Cnidoscolus quercifolius Pohl Cnidoscolus quercifolius PohlN[3, 9, 5860, 62, 70, 71, 74, 77, 88]PB, SE, CE, PI, RN
Cnidoscolus phyllacanthus (Mull. Arg.) Pax and  L. Hoffm.[9, 60, 71, 74, 88]PB, CE, PI

VelameEuphorbiaceae Croton rhamnifolius Willd. Croton heliotropiifolius KunthN[3, 57, 59, 6264, 70, 73, 75, 76, 80, 85, 94, 95]PE, PB, SE, PI, RN, BA
Croton heliotropiifolius Kunth
Croton moritibensis Baill.
Croton sonderianus Mull. Arg. Croton sonderianus Mull. Arg.N[61, 93]PE, MA
Croton campestris A. St.-Hil. Croton campestris A. St.-Hil.N[69, 71, 74, 78, 92]PB, CE, PI, BA
Croton tenuifolius Pax and K. Hoffm. Croton betaceus Baill.N[57]PI

AcansuFabaceae Periandra dulcis Mart. ex  Benth. Periandra mediterranea (Vell.) Taub.N[53, 80, 89]PE, PB, BA
Periandra mediterranea (Vell.) Taub.

ChananaTurneraceae Turnera ulmifolia  L. Turnera ulmifolia  L.E[1, 9, 11, 56, 57, 60, 61, 65, 66, 68, 71, 89]PE, PB, CE, PI, MA
Turnera subulata Sm. Turnera subulata Sm.N[55, 59, 62, 78, 88, 89, 95]PB, SE, CE, RN
Turnera chamaedrifolia Cambess. Turnera chamaedrifolia Cambess.N[77]PB
Turnera guianensis Aubl. Turnera guianensis Aubl.N[68]MA

João MoleNyctaginaceae Guapira opposita (Vell.) Reitz Guapira opposita (Vell.) ReitzN[85, 86]PB
Guapira noxia (Netto) Lundell Guapira noxia (Netto) LundellN[95]SE

Unha de gatoLycopodiaceae Lycopodiella cernua (L.) Pic. Serm. Lycopodiella cernua (L.) Pic. Serm. N[56]PE
Alismataceae Echinochloa colona (L.) Link Echinochloa colona (L.) LinkE[75]PE
Rubiaceae Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC. Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC.N[11, 54, 68, 72]PE, PB, MA
Fabaceae Acacia paniculata Willd. Senegalia tenuifolia (L.) Britton and Rose N[9, 52, 60, 63, 64, 73, 76]PE, CE
Mimosa somnians Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd. Mimosa somnians Humb. and Bonpl.   ex Willd.N[95]SE
Mimosa sensitiva  L. Mimosa sensitiva  L.N[58]SE

Lingua de VacaAsteraceae Elephantopus mollis Kunth Elephantopus mollis KunthE [66]MA
Portulacaceae Talinum portulacifolium (Forssk.) Asch. ex Schweinf. Talinum portulacifolium (Forssk.) Asch. ex Schweinf. E[58]SE
Fabaceae Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth. Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth.N[90]RN
Sapotaceae Chrysophyllum splendens Spreng. Chrysophyllum splendens Spreng. N[82]BA
Alismataceae Echinodorus subalatus (Mart.) Griseb. Echinodorus subalatus (Mart.) Griseb.N[59]RN

LacreClusiaceae Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers. Vismia guianensis (Aubl.) Pers.N[1, 11, 53, 56, 65, 78, 86, 89, 94]PE, PB, CE
Vismia brasiliensis Choisy Vismia brasiliensis ChoisyN[87]PI

JurubebaSolanaceae Solanum paniculatum  L. Solanum paniculatum  L.N[1, 11, 52, 53, 56, 63, 67, 7477, 80, 86, 88, 93, 94]PE, PB, PI, BA
Solanum paludosum Moric. Solanum paludosum Moric.N[58, 89, 90]PB, SE, RN
Solanum absconditum Agra Solanum absconditum Agra N[85]PB
Solanum auriculatum Aiton Solanum mauritianum Scop.N[97]SE
Solanum erianthum D. Don Solanum granuloso-leprosum DunalN[78]CE
Solanum polytrichum Moric. Solanum polyrtrichum Moric.N[82]BA
Solanum albidum Dunal Solanum albidum DunalE[55]CE
Solanum tabacifolium Vell. Solanum scuticum M. NeeN[79]BA
Solanum lycocarpum A. St.-Hil. Solanum lycocarpum A. St.-Hil.N[66]MA

CedroMeliaceae Cedrela fissilis Vell. Cedrela fissilis Vell.N[80, 86, 93]PE, PB, BA
Cedrela odorata  L. Cedrela odorata  L.N[1, 11, 52, 53, 56, 63, 72, 73, 76, 84, 85]PE, PB, BA
Tiliaceae Luehea grandiflora Mart. Luehea grandiflora Mart.N[69]BA

Crista de galoAmaranthaceae Celosia cristata  L. Celosia argentea  L.E[61, 63, 94]PE, MA
Plumbaginaceae Plumbago scandens  L. Plumbago scandens  L.N[95]SE
Boraginaceae Heliotropium indicum  L. Heliotropium indicum  L.N[58, 78, 83, 88]PB, SE, CE, BA
Heliotropium angiospermum Murray Heliotropium angiospermum MurrayN[11]PE
Heliotropium tiaridioides Cham. Heliotropium transalpinum Vell.N[74]PI

ManjeronaLamiaceae Ocimum americanum  L. Ocimum americanum  L.E[1, 56, 65]PE
Origanum majorana  L. Origanum majorana  L.E[66, 84, 99, 100]PB, MA, RN, BA

AngelimFabaceae Andira nitida Mart. ex Benth. Andira nitida Mart. ex  Benth.N[56]PE
Piptadenia obliqua (Pers.) J. F. Macbr. Pityrocarpa obliqua subsp. brasiliensis (G. P. Lewis) Luckow and R. W. JobsonN[60]CE
Andira vermifuga Mart. ex Benth. Andira vermifuga Mart. ex Benth.N[74]PI
Andira paniculata Benth. Andira paniculata Benth.N[87]PI
Luetzelburgia auriculata (Allemão) Ducke Luetzelburgia auriculata (Allemão) DuckeN[87]PI

ArrozinhoPolygalaceae Polygala gracilis Kunth Polygala gracilis KunthN[88]PB
Polygala paniculata  L. Polygala paniculata  L.N[88]PB
Fabaceae Zornia latifolia Sm. Zornia latifolia Sm. N[67]BA

Anil estreladoSchisandraceae Illicium verum Hook. f. Illicium verum Hook. f.E[1, 11, 53]PE

CavalinhaEquisetaceae Equisetum hyemale  L. Equisetum hyemale  L.E[54]PB
Equisetum giganteum  L. Equisetum giganteum  L.N[93]PE
Equisetum arvense  L. Equisetum arvense  L.E[84]BA

ChumbinhoVerbenaceae Lantana camara  L. Lantana camara  L.N[11, 53, 56, 58, 63, 64, 67, 73, 76, 82, 86, 8890, 95, 96, 98]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA
Oxalidaceae Oxalis insipida A. St.-Hill. Oxalis psoraleoides KunthN[73]PE
Sapindaceae Cardiospermum corindum  L. Cardiospermum corindum  L.N[74]PI
Cardiospermum halicacabum  L. Cardiospermum halicacabum  L.N[74]PI

CamaráVerbenaceae Lantana camara  L. Lantana camara  L.N[60, 67, 71, 74, 88]PB, CE, PI, BA
Lantana canescens Kunth Lantana canescens KunthN[58]SE
Asteraceae Wedelia scaberrima Benth.Wedelia calycina Rich. N[90]RN
Verbesina diversifolia DC. Verbesina diversifolia DC.N[86]PB

Canela de velhoMelastomataceae Miconia albicans (Sw.) Steud. Miconia albicans (Sw.) Steud.N[67]BA
Fabaceae Cenostigma Gardnerianum Tul. Cenostigma macrophyllum Tul.N[74]PI
Primulaceae Cybianthus detergens Mart. Cybianthus detergens Mart.N[78]CE

CatuabaBignoniaceae Anemopaegma arvense (Vell.) Stellfeld and J. F. Souza Anemopaegma arvense (Vell.) Stellfeld and J. F. SouzaN[68]MA
Erythroxylaceae Erythroxylum amplifolium (Mart.) O. E. Schulz Erythroxylum amplifolium (Mart.) O. E. SchulzN[78]CE
Erythroxylum vacciniifolium Mart. Erythroxylum vacciniifolium Mart.N[66, 69]MA, BA

JapecangaSmilacaceae Smilax campestris Griseb. Smilax campestris Griseb. N[78]CE
Smilax japecanga Griseb. Smilax japecanga Griseb. N[98]CE
Smilax cissoides Mart. ex Griseb. Smilax cissoides Mart. ex Griseb. N[85]PB
Smilax rotundifolia  L. Smilax rotundifolia  L.N[11]PE

VassourinhaPlantaginaceae Scoparia dulcis  L. Scoparia dulcis  L.N[9, 59, 61, 66, 67, 71, 74, 78, 80, 83, 88]PB, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA
Asteraceae Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC. Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC.N[93]PE
Brassicaceae Nasturtium officinale W. T. Aiton Nasturtium officinale W. T. Aiton E[93]PE
Scrophulariaceae Capraria biflora  L. Capraria biflora  L.N[60]CE
Polygalaceae Polygala paniculata  L. Polygala paniculata  L.N[67]BA
Rubiaceae Borreria scabiosoides Cham. and Schldl. Borreria scabiosoides Cham. and Schldl.N[89]PB
Spermacoce verticillata  L. Borreria verticillata (L.) G. Mey. N[57]PI

TransagemPlantaginaceae Plantago major  L. Plantago major  L.E[53, 54, 67, 69, 72, 79, 83, 84, 94]PE, PB, BA
Alismataceae Echinodorus grandiflorus (Cham. and Schltd L.) Micheli Echinodorus grandiflorus (Cham. and Schltd L.) Micheli N[76, 93]PE

AlcachofraAsteraceae Vernonia condensata Baker Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Delile) Sch. Bip. ex Walp.N[1, 53, 56, 63, 67, 76, 94]PE
Cynara scolymus  L. Cynara cardunculus  L.E[52, 63, 84]PE, BA
Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Delile) Sch. Bip. ex Walp. Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Delile) Sch. Bip. ex Walp.N[11]PE

AçafrãoZingiberaceae Curcuma longa  L. Curcuma longa  L.E[72, 84]PB, BA

Alfavaca Lamiaceae Ocimum basilicum  L. Ocimum basilicum  L.E[68, 81]MA, RN
Ocimum campechianum Mill. Ocimum campechianum Mill.N[9, 53, 60, 83]PE, CE, BA
Ocimum gratissimum  L. Ocimum gratissimum  L.E[1, 55, 56, 61, 78]PE, CE, MA

CatoléArecaceae Syagrus oleracea (Mart.) Becc. Syagrus oleracea (Mart.) Becc.N[85]PB
Syagrus picrophylla Barb. Rodr. Syagrus picrophylla Barb. Rodr.N[55]CE
Syagrus cearensis Noblick Syagrus cearensis NoblickN[78]CE

MentrastoAsteraceae Ageratum conyzoides  L. Ageratum conyzoides  L.N[5860, 69, 78, 83, 94, 99]PE, SE, CE, RN, BA
Stilpnopappus scaposus DC. Stilpnopappus scaposus DC.N[96]SE
Blainvillea rhomboidea Cass. Blainvillea acmella (L.) PhilipsonN[96]SE
Prolobus nitidulus (Baker) R. M. King and H. Rob. Prolobus nitidulus (Baker) R. M. King and H. Rob.N[96]SE
Polygalaceae Polygala violacea Aubl. Polygala violacea Aubl.N[95]SE

CatingueiraFabaceae Caesalpinia pyramidalis Tul. Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul.) L. P. QueirozN[3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 62, 63, 67, 70, 71, 7577, 88, 90, 95, 99]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN
Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul.) L. P. Queiroz
Caesalpinia bracteosa Tul. Poincianella bracteosa (Tul.) L. P. QueirozN[57, 60]CE, PI
Poincianella microphylla (Mart. ex G. Don) L. P. Queiroz Poincianella microphylla (Mart. ex G. Don) L. P. QueirozN[80]BA

MarmeleiroEuphorbiaceae Croton blanchetianus Baill. Croton blanchetianus Baill.N[3, 52, 59, 63, 64, 70, 73, 76, 78, 80, 95]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA
Croton sonderianus Mull. Arg. Croton sonderianus Mull. Arg.N[55, 62, 71, 72, 74, 75, 81, 90]PE, PB, CE, PI, RN
Croton rhamnifolius Willd. Croton heliotropiifolius KunthN[98]CE
Croton urticifolius Lam. Croton urticifolius Lam.N[86]PB
Croton argyrophylloides Mull. Arg. Croton argyrophylloides Mull. Arg.N[76]PE

OiticicaChrysobalanaceae Licania rigida Benth. Licania rigida Benth.N[9, 55, 59, 60, 7072, 77, 85, 99]PB, CE, RN

PicãoAsteraceae Bidens pilosa  L. Bidens pilosa  L.E[61, 67]MA, BA

Barriguda Malvaceae Ceiba glaziovii (Kuntze) K. Schum. Ceiba glaziovii (Kuntze) K. Schum.N[9, 77, 85, 88]PB, CE
Bombacaceae Chorisia glaziovii (Kuntze) E. Santos Chorisia glaziovii (Kuntze) E. SantosN[63, 64, 73, 75]PE
Lamiaceae Hypenia salzmannii (Benth.) Harley Hypenia salzmannii (Benth.) HarleyN[57]PI

ViquePolygalaceae Polygala paniculata  L. Polygala paniculata  L.N[67, 90]RN, BA
Polygala bryoides A. St.-Hil. and Moq. Polygala bryoides A.St.-Hil. and Moq.N[90]RN
Lamiaceae Mentha spicata  L. Mentha spicata  L.E[66, 68]MA
Mentha pulegium  L. Mentha pulegium  L.E[56]PE

AgriãoBrassicaceae Nasturtium officinale W. T. Aiton Nasturtium officinale W. T. AitonE[9, 53, 56, 69, 81, 93, 94, 99]PE, CE, RN, BA
Rorippa pumila (Camb.) A. Lima Rorippa pumila (Camb.) A. Lima E[65]PE
Asteraceae Acmella ciliata (Kunth) Cass. Acmella ciliata (Kunth) Cass. N[57]PI
Acmella oleracea (L.) R. K. Jansen Acmella oleracea (L.) R. K. JansenN[72]PB

AlgodãoMalvaceae Gossypium hirsutum  L. Gossypium hirsutum  L.E[57, 78, 93]PE, CE, PI
Gossypium barbadense  L. Gossypium barbadense  L.E[56, 67, 78]PE, CE, BA
Gossypium herbaceum  L. Gossypium herbaceum  L.E[66, 68, 69, 75, 83, 84]PE, MA, BA
Gossypium arboreum  L. Gossypium arboreum  L.E[61]MA

AmeixaOlacaceae Ximenia americana  L. Ximenia americana  L.N[3, 9, 11, 53, 55, 5760, 62, 70, 74, 78, 90, 97]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, RN
Sapotaceae Chrysophyllum arenarium Allemão Chrysophyllum arenarium AllemãoN[98]CE
Myrtaceae Eugenia cumini (L.) Druce Syzygium cumini (L.) SkeelsE[68]MA
Rosaceae Prunus domestica  L. Prunus domestica  L.E[81]RN

AnadorLamiaceae Plectranthus barbatus Andrews Plectranthus barbatus AndrewsE[68]MA
Ocimum selloi Benth. Ocimum carnosum (Spreng.) Link and Otto ex Benth.N[67]BA
Acanthaceae Justicia gendarussa Burm. f. Justicia gendarussa Burm. f. E[53]PE
Justicia pectoralis Jacq. Justicia pectoralis Jacq.N[52, 55, 63, 94]PE, CE
Amaranthaceae Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) Kuntze Alternanthera brasiliana (L.) KuntzeN[67, 69]BA
Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) Pedersen Pfaffia glomerata (Spreng.) PedersenN[67, 79]BA
Asteraceae Artemisia vulgaris  L. Artemisia vulgaris  L.E[72, 78]PB, CE
Iodina rhombifolia Hook. and Arn. Jodina rhombifolia (Hook. and Arn) ReissekN[100]PB

ArrudaRutaceae Ruta graveolens  L. Ruta graveolens  L.E[1, 9, 11, 5257, 63, 65, 6769, 72, 75, 76, 78, 79, 81, 83, 84, 93, 94, 99101]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA

ArtemísiaAsteraceae Artemisia vulgaris  L. Artemisia vulgaris  L.E[54, 69, 83, 84, 94]PE, PB, BA

BambuPoaceae Dendrocalamus giganteus Wall. ex Munro Dendrocalamus giganteus Wall. ex Munro E[11, 56]PE
Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Willd. Bambusa bambos (L.) VossE[69]BA
Bambusa vulgaris Schrad. ex J. C. Wendl. Bambusa vulgaris Schrad. ex J. C. Wendl.E[84]BA

JanaubaApocynacaee Himatanthus bracteatus (A. DC.) Woodson Himatanthus bracteatus (A. DC.) WoodsonN[82]BA
Himatanthus sucuuba (Spruce ex Mull. Arg.) Woodson Himatanthus sucuuba (Spruce ex Mull. Arg.) WoodsonN[66]MA
Himatanthus drasticus (Mart.) Plumel Himatanthus drasticus (Mart.) PlumelN[78, 98]CE

BarbatimãoFabaceae Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) Coville Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) CovilleN[1, 79, 92, 94, 99]PE, CE, RN, BA
Stryphnodendron barbatimam Mart.
Abarema cochliacarpos (Gomes) Barneby and J. W. Abarema cochliacarpos (Gomes) Barneby and J. W. N[11, 53, 56, 69]PE, BA
Pithecellobium cochliacarpum (Gomes) J. F. Macbr.
Stryphnodendron coriaceum Benth. Stryphnodendron coriaceum Benth.N[54, 71, 78, 87, 98]PB, CE, PI

Bom nomeCelastraceae Maytenus rigida Mart. Maytenus rigida Mart.N[1, 3, 9, 5254, 56, 58, 60, 63, 67, 71, 73, 7577, 88, 9597]PE, PB, SE, CE
Maytenus distichophylla Mart. Maytenus distichophylla Mart.N[78]CE

CajuAnacardiaceae Anacardium occidentale  L. Anacardium occidentale  L.N[9, 11, 54, 5658, 61, 63, 6668, 71, 75, 78, 79, 8184, 86, 87, 89, 9294, 99]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA

Cardo santoPapaveraceae Argemone mexicana  L. Argemone subfusiformis G. B. OwnbeyE[1, 11, 53, 60, 71, 75, 77, 79, 83, 88, 93]PE, PB, CE, BA
Argemone subfusiformis G. B. Ownbey
Asteraceae Carduus benedictus Gaert. Carduus benedictus Gaert.E[84]BA

CandeiaFabaceae Plathymenia reticulata Benth. Plathymenia reticulata Benth.N[61, 74]PI, MA
Asteraceae Gochnatia oligocephala (Gardner) Cabrera Gochnatia oligocephala (Gardner) CabreraN[80]BA

Canela Lamiaceae Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume Cinnamomum verum J. PreslE[11, 53, 63, 69, 76, 81, 83, 84, 93]PE, RN, BA
Lauraceae Nectandra cuspidata Nees and Mart. Nectandra cuspidata Nees and Mart.N[56]PE
Nectandra leucantha Nees and Mart. Nectandra leucantha Nees and Mart.N[94]PE

MandacaruCactaceae Cereus jamacaru DC. Cereus jamacaru DC.N[1, 9, 52, 53, 56, 5860, 63, 71, 75, 76, 78, 80, 88, 9395]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA
Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.E[66]MA

CarquejaAsteraceae Baccharis trimera (Less.) DC. Baccharis crispa Spreng. N[1, 68, 79, 83, 99]PE, MA, RN, BA

CidreiraVerbenaceae Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Br. ex Britton and P. Wilson Lippia alba (Mill.) N. E. Br. ex Britton and P. WilsonN[1, 3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 55, 57, 58, 6163, 6769, 72, 75, 76, 78, 79, 83, 9395, 99, 100]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA
Lippia citriodora Kunth Aloysia citriodora PalauE[97]SE
Lamiaceae Melissa officinalis  L. Melissa officinalis  L.E[66, 81, 84, 92, 93]PE, CE, MA, RN, BA

Pra tudoCrassulaceae Kalanchoe brasiliensis Cambess. Kalanchoe crenata (Andrews) Haw.E[75]PE
Sapindaceae Cardiospermum halicacabum  L. Cardiospermum halicacabum  L.N[77]PB
Rutaceae Zanthoxylum hamadryadicum Pirani Zanthoxylum hamadryadicum PiraniN[74]PI
Fabaceae Acosmium dasycarpum (Vogel) Yakovlev Leptolobium dasycarpum VogelN[78]CE

CopaibaFabaceae Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. N[61, 66]MA
Copaifera coriacea Mart. Copaifera coriacea Mart.N[87]PI
Copaifera reticulata Ducke Copaifera reticulata DuckeN[68]MA
Copaifera officinalis (Jacq.)   L. Copaifera officinalis (Jacq.)   L.N[84]BA
Copaifera lucens Dwyer Copaifera lucens DwyerN[69]BA

Courama Malvaceae Malvaviscus arboreus Cav. Malvaviscus arboreus Cav.E[81]RN
Crassulaceae Kalanchoe brasiliensis Cambess. Kalanchoe crenata (Andrews) Haw.E[53, 55, 56, 65]PE, CE
Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln. Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln. E[94]PE
Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Oken Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pers.E[1, 65, 72, 84, 99]PE, PB, RN, BA
Bryophyllum calycinum Salisb.
Kalanchoe pinnata (Lam.) Pers.

Cordão de São FranciscoLamiaceae Leonotis nepetifolia (L.) R. Br. Leonotis nepetifolia (L.) R. Br.aE[9, 57, 60, 67, 68, 71]PB, CE, PI, MA, BA
Leucas martinicensis (Jacq.) R. Br. Leucas martinicensis (Jacq.) R. Br.E[77]PB

EmbaúbaUrticaceae Cecropia palmata Willd. Cecropia palmata Willd.N[86]PB
Cecropia pachystachya Trécul Cecropia pachystachya TréculN[61, 67, 82, 85]PB, MA, BA
Cecropia peltata  L. Cecropia peltata  L.N[74]PI

ImbiribaAnnonaceae Guatteria australis A. St.-Hil. Guatteria australis A. St.-Hil.N[9]CE
Lecythidaceae Eschweilera ovata (Cambess.) Miers Eschweilera ovata (Cambess.) MiersN[56, 85, 86, 89]PE, PB

Espinheira santaFabaceae Zollernia ilicifolia (Brongn.) Vogel Zollernia ilicifolia (Brongn.) VogelN[53]PE
Celastraceae Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex Reissek Maytenus ilicifolia Mart. ex ReissekN[68, 72, 79]PB, MA, BA

GengibreZingiberaceae Zingiber officinale Roscoe Zingiber officinale RoscoeE[53, 57, 66, 68, 72, 84, 93, 94]PE, PB, PI, MA, BA

GraviolaAnnonaceae Annona muricata  L. Annona muricata  L.E[3, 9, 11, 56, 63, 69, 75, 83, 93, 94, 99]PE, PB, CE, RN, BA
Rollinia sericea (R. E. Fr.) R. E. Fr. Annona neosericea H. RainerN[67]BA
Annona cherimola Mill. Annona cherimola Mill.E[84]BA

JaboticabaMyrtaceae Myrciaria cauliflora (Mart.) O. Berg Plinia cauliflora (Mart.) KauselN[52, 63, 69, 76]PE, BA

JuáRhamnaceae Ziziphus joazeiro Mart. Ziziphus joazeiro Mart.N[3, 9, 56, 57, 59, 60, 6264, 67, 68, 7072, 7476, 78, 80, 81, 85, 86, 88, 89, 92, 93, 95]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA
Ziziphus cotinifolia Reissek Ziziphus cotinifolia ReissekN[77, 88]PB

LouroLauraceae Laurus nobilis  L. Laurus nobilis  L.E[81, 84, 93]PE, RN, BA
Ocotea glomerata (Nees) Mez Ocotea glomerata (Nees) MezN[56]PE
Ocimum gratisssimum  L. Ocimum gratisssimum  L.E[52, 63, 76, 94]PE
Ocotea duckei Vattimo Ocotea duckei VattimoN[89]PB
Laurus azorica (Seub.) Franco Laurus azorica (Seub.) FrancoE[100]PB

Erva doceApiaceae Pimpinella anisum  L. Pimpinella anisum  L.E[1, 3, 11, 52, 56, 63, 68, 76, 78, 79, 81, 83, 92, 93, 100]PE, PB, CE, MA, RN, BA
Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Foeniculum vulgare Mill.E[53, 67, 69, 84, 94]PE, BA

EndroApiaceae Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Foeniculum vulgare Mill.E[1, 3, 11, 52, 63, 78]PE, PB, CE
Anethum graveolens  L. Anethum graveolens  L.E[53, 54, 57, 72, 93, 100]PE, PB, PI

AlecrimLamiaceae Rosmarinus officinalis  L. Rosmarinus officinalis  L.E[3, 11, 52, 53, 56, 63, 65, 68, 69, 72, 75, 76, 78, 79, 84, 92, 93, 99, 100]PE, PB, CE, MA, RN, BA
Fabaceae Calliandra depauperata Benth. Calliandra depauperata Benth.N[60]CE
Verbenaceae Lippia thymoides Mart. and Schauer Lippia thymoides Mart. and Schauer N[80]BA

AbacateLauraceae Persea americana Mill. Persea americana Mill.E[11, 63, 66, 67, 6769, 76, 78, 79, 83, 84, 89, 94, 99]PE, PB, CE, MA, RN, BA

AlfazemaLamiaceae Lavandula spica Cav. Lavandula spica Cav.E[1, 93]PE
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.N[60]CE
Lavandula officinalis Chaix Lavandula officinalis ChaixE[99]RN
Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.N[52]PE
Verbenaceae Aloysia lycioides Cham. Aloysia lycioides Cham. N[69]BA

AlumãAsteraceae Vernonia condensata Baker Vernonia bahiensis Toledo Gymnanthemum amygdalinum (Delile) Sch.Bip. ex Walp.N[67, 79, 83, 84, 101]SE, BA

BabosaXanthorrhoeaceae Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. Aloe barbadensis Mill. Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f.E[1, 3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 5557, 6669, 76, 78, 79, 81, 9294, 99, 101] PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA
Aloe socotrina Schult. and Schult. f. Aloe socotrina Schult. and Schult. f.E[83]BA

BoldoMonimiaceae Peumus boldus Molina Peumus boldus MolinaE[1, 3, 52, 53, 63, 76, 81, 99, 100]PE, PB, RN
Lamiaceae Plectranthus barbatus Andrews Plectranthus barbatus AndrewsE[57, 66, 69, 79]PI, MA, BA
Coleus barbatus (Andrews) Benth.[79]BA
Plectranthus neochilus Schltr. Plectranthus neochilus Schltr.E[67, 83]BA

CabacinhaCucurbitaceae Luffa operculata (L.) Cogn. Luffa operculata (L.) Cogn. N[1, 3, 11, 53, 59, 62, 66, 68, 76, 77, 84, 88, 93]PE, PB, MA, RN, BA

CamomilaAsteraceae Matricaria chamomila  L. Matricaria chamomila  L.E[3, 9, 11, 53, 6769, 81, 84, 93]PE, PB, CE, MA, RN, BA
Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg ex Sweet Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg ex Sweet E[94]PE

Cana de macacoCostaceae Costus spicatus (Jacq.) Sw. Costus spicatus (Jacq.) Sw.N[1, 78]PE, CE
Costus spiralis (Jacq.) Roscoe Costus spiralis (Jacq.) RoscoeN[67, 94]PE, BA
Costus arabicus  L. Costus arabicus  L.N[93]PE

CanapumSolanaceae Physalis angulata  L. Physalis angulata  L.E[57, 66, 68, 74]PI, MA
Passifloraceae Passiflora foetida  L. Passiflora foetida  L.N[70, 77]PB

CaninanaRubiaceae Chiococca alba (L.) Hitchc. Chiococca alba (L.) Hitchc.N[9, 82, 89]PB, CE, BA
Polygalaceae Polygala paniculata L. Polygala paniculata L.N[78]CE

Capim santoPoaceae Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) StapfE[1, 3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 55, 56, 63, 67, 69, 72, 75, 76, 78, 79, 83, 93, 94, 99101]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA

CarambolaOxalidaceae Averrhoa carambola  L. Averrhoa carambola  L.E[1, 11, 56, 57, 66, 79, 93, 94, 99]PE, PI, MA, RN, BA

CarrapateiraEuphorbiaceae Ricinus communis  L. Ricinus communis  L.E[11, 56, 63, 71, 89, 93]PE, PB

Cebola brancaLiliaceae Allium cepa  L. Allium cepa  L.E[3, 9, 92]PB, CE
Allium ascalonicum L.Allium ascalonicum L.E[53, 55, 69, 76]PE, CE, BA

ChambáAcanthaceae Justicia pectoralis Jacq. Justicia pectoralis Jacq.N[53, 56, 65, 94]PE

ColôniaZingiberaceae Alpinia speciosa (Blume) D. Dietr. Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) B. L. Burtt and R. M. Sm. Alpinia speciosa (Blume) D. Dietr.E[9, 53, 65, 76, 78, 84, 93, 94, 100]PE, PB, CE, BA

ConfreiBoraginaceae Symphytum officinale  L. Symphytum officinale  L.E[53, 67, 69, 83, 84, 93, 94]PE, BA

Cravo brancoCaryophyllaceae Dianthus caryophyllus  L. Dianthus caryophyllus  L.E[1, 11, 52, 53, 63, 65]PE
Asteraceae Tagetes erecta  L. Tagetes erecta  L.E[67, 72, 76, 93]PE, PB

Erva mouraSolanaceae Solanum americanum Mill. Solanum americanum Mill.E[1, 11, 52, 53, 56, 57, 60, 76, 88]PE, PB, CE, PI

Espinho de ciganoAsteraceae Acanthospermum hispidum DC. Acanthospermum hispidum DC.E[1, 3, 11, 52, 56, 63, 72, 75, 76, 88, 94, 100]PE, PB

EucaliptoMyrtaceae Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Eucalyptus globulus Labill.E[9, 57, 63, 67, 69, 71, 72, 79, 81, 84, 92]PE, PB, CE, PI, RN, BA
Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. E[11, 55, 56, 94]PE, CE

PinhaAnnonaceae Annona squamosa  L. Annona squamosa  L.E[11, 56, 63, 75, 76, 84, 93, 99]PE, RN, BA
Annona coriacea Mart. Annona coriacea Mart.N[98]CE
Annona tomentosa R. E. Fr. Annona tomentosa R. E. Fr.N[98]CE

MamoeiroCaricaceae Carica papaya  L. Carica papaya  L.E[3, 55, 68, 83, 92, 94]PE, PB, CE, MA, BA

GergelimPedaliaceae Sesamum orientale  L. Sesamum orientale  L.E[3, 9, 11, 53, 67, 81, 92]PE, PB, CE, RN
Sesamum indicum  L.

GirassolAsteraceae Helianthus annuus  L. Helianthus annuus  L.E[9, 11, 53, 56, 63, 68, 69, 72, 92, 93]PE, PB, CE, MA, BA
Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray E[76]PE

ImbiraAnnonaceae Xylopia frutescens Aubl. Xylopia frutescens Aubl.N[53, 86]PE, PB
Xylopia laevigata (Mart.) R. E. Fr. Xylopia laevigata (Mart.) R. E. Fr.N[89]PB

IpeBignoniaceae Tabebuia aurea (Silva Manso) Benth. and Hook. f. ex  S. Moore Tabebuia aurea (Silva Manso) Benth. and Hook. f. ex  S. MooreN[82]BA
Tabebuia avellanedae Lorentz ex  Griseb. Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex  DC.) MattosN[82]BA
Tabebuia chrysotricha (Mart. ex A. DC.) Standl. Handroanthus chrysotrichus (Mart. ex  DC.) MattosN[82]BA
Tabebuia roseo-alba (Ridl.) Sandwith Tabebuia roseoalba (Ridl.) SandwithN[82]BA

Pau d'arco roxoBignoniaceae Tabebuia avellanedae Lorentz ex Griseb. Tabebuia impetiginosa (Mart.  ex  DC.) Standl. Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart.  ex  DC.) MattosN[3, 9, 11, 54, 56, 58, 60, 65, 69, 70, 74, 85, 89, 100]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, BA

Pau d'arco Bignoniaceae Tabebuia avellanedae Lorentz ex  Griseb. Handroanthus impetiginosus (Mart. ex  DC.) MattosN[53, 62, 80]PE, RN, BA
Tabebuia impetiginosa (Mart. ex  DC.) Standl.
Tabebuia ochracea (Cham.) Standl. Handroanthus ochraceus (Cham.) MattosN[93]PE
Tabebuia serratifolia (Vahl) G. Nicholson Handroanthus serratifolius (A.H.Gentry) S. GroseN[74, 86]PB, PI
Tabebuia spongiosa Rizzini Handroanthus spongiosus (Rizzini) S.GroseN[74]PI
Tabebuia aurea (Silva Manso) Benth. and Hook. f. ex  S. Moore Tabebuia aurea (Silva Manso) Benth. and Hook. f. ex  S. Moore N[63, 92]PE, CE
Tabebuia caraiba (Mart.) Bureau

PepaconhaViolaceae Hybanthus ipecacuanha (L.) Baill. Hybanthus calceolaria (L.) Oken Hybanthus calceolaria (L.) OkenN[9, 53, 55, 56, 59, 71, 75, 77, 88, 90, 93, 94]PE, PB, CE, RN
Rubiaceae Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes Cephaelis ipecacuanha (Brot.) A. Rich. Carapichea ipecacuanha (Brot.) L. AnderssonN[1, 11, 81]PE, RN

LosnaAsteraceae Artemisia absinthium  L. Artemisia absinthium  L.E[9, 54, 93]PE, PB, CE
Artemisia vulgaris  L. Artemisia vulgaris  L.E[1, 65]PE

MacassaLamiaceae Aeollanthus suaveolens Mart. ex  Spreng. Aeollanthus suaveolens Mart. ex  Spreng. E[53, 56, 63, 65, 76, 84]PE, PB, BA

JatobáFabaceae Hymenaea courbaril  L. Hymenaea courbaril  L.N[9, 53, 55, 61, 63, 66, 68, 71, 75, 76, 80, 8587, 89, 92, 93, 100]PE, PB, CE, PI, MA, BA
Hymenaea martiana Hayne Hymenaea martiana HayneN[56]PE
Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. ex  Hayne Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. ex  HayneN[69, 98]CE, BA
Hymenaea aurea Y. T. Lee and Langenh. Hymenaea aurea Y. T. Lee and Langenh.N[74]PI

JerimumCucurbitaceae Cucurbita pepo  L. Cucurbita pepo  L.E[11, 56, 68, 76, 93, 100]PE, PB, MA
Cucurbita argyrosperma Hort. ex L. H. Bailey Cucurbita argyrosperma Hort. ex L. H. BaileyE[78]CE

Hortelã miudaLamiaceae Coleus forskohlii (Willd.) Briq. Coleus forskohlii (Willd.) Briq. E[67]PE
Mentha piperita  L. Mentha piperita  L.E[3]PB
Mentha viridis (L.) L. Mentha spicata  L.E[69]BA

Hortelã graudaLamiaceae Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. Plectranthus unguentarius Codd E[3, 53, 56, 69]PE, PB, BA

LimãoRutaceae Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) Swingle Citrus aurantium  L.E[9]CE
Citrus limonia (L.) Osbeck Citrus medica  L.E[56, 66, 69, 78, 79, 81, 84, 92, 99]PE, CE, MA, RN, BA
Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck
Citrus limonum Risso

MacelaArecaceae Egletes viscosa (L.) Less. Egletes viscosa (L.) Less.E[1, 3, 9, 11, 53, 59, 60, 67, 72, 75, 78, 84, 88, 101]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA
Asteraceae Achyrocline satureioides (Lam.) DC. Achyrocline satureioides (Lam.) DC.N[81, 99]RN
Lamiaceae Hyptis martiusii Benth. Hyptis martiusii Benth.N[80]BA

MaliciaFabaceae Mimosa invisa Mart. ex Colla Mimosa invisa Mart. ex CollaN[56]PE
Schrankia leptocarpa DC. Mimosa candollei R. Grether N[56]PE
Mimosa misera Benth. Mimosa misera Benth.N[90]RN
Mimosa somnians Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd. Mimosa somnians Humb. and Bonpl. ex Willd.N[85]PB
Mimosa pudica  L. Mimosa pudica  L.N[78]CE

MalvaSterculiaceae Piriqueta racemosa (Jacq.) Sweet Piriqueta racemosa (Jacq.) Sweet N[95]SE
Melochia tomentosa  L. Melochia tomentosa  L.N[75]PE
Waltheria indica  L. Waltheria americana  L.N[78]CE
Piriqueta guianensis N. E. Br. Piriqueta guianensis N. E. Br.N[95]SE
Lamiaceae Plectranthus barbatus Andrews Plectranthus barbatus AndrewsE[55]CE
Malvaceae Malva sylvestris  L. Malva erecta J. Presl and C. PreslE[81, 99]RN
Sida linifolia Cav. Sida linifolia Cav.N[89]PB

Manga espadaAnacardiaceae Mangifera indica  L. Mangifera indica  L.E[52, 69, 76]PE

CapitãozinhoGomphrenaceae Gomphrena demissa Mart. Gomphrena demissa Mart.N[54, 59, 62, 71, 77]PB, RN

Malva rosaSterculiaceae Melochia tomentosa  L. Melochia tomentosa  L.N[3]PB
Geraniaceae Geranium erodifolium  L. Geranium erodifolium  L.E[53]PE
Malvaceae Alcea rosea  L. Althaea rosea (L.) Cav.E[100]PB
Urena lobata  L. Urena lobata  L.N[1, 11, 93]PE

Malva brancaSterculiaceae Waltheria rotundifolia Schrank Waltheria rotundifolia SchrankN[3]PB
Malvaceae Sida cordifolia  L. Sida cordifolia  L.N[1, 57, 60, 67, 69, 88]PE, PB, CE, PI, BA
Sida galheirensis Ulbr. Sida galheirensis Ulbr.N[77]PB

ManjericãoLamiaceae Ocimum basilicum  L. Ocimum basilicum  L.E[3, 53, 55, 65, 67, 69, 72, 76, 78, 79, 81, 94, 101]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA
Ociumum americanum  L. Ocumum americanum  L.E[57, 78, 83, 93]PE, CE, PI, BA
Ocimum minimum  L. Ocimum minimum  L.E[68]MA
Ocimum sanctum  L. Ocimum tenuiflorum  L.E[84]BA

MastruzChenopodiaceae Chenopodium ambrosioides  L. Chenopodium ambrosioides  L.E[1, 3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 5557, 59, 6163, 6669, 72, 75, 76, 7981, 83, 9294, 100]PE, PB, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA

Melão de São CaetanoCucurbitaceae Momordica charantia  L. Momordica charantia  L.E[53, 5557, 60, 66, 72, 75, 76, 79, 8385, 90, 92, 94, 99]PE, PB, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA

MufumboCombretaceae Combretum fruticosum (Loefl.) Stuntz Combretum fruticosum (Loefl.) StuntzN[57, 70]PB, PI
Combretum leprosum Mart. Combretum leprosum Mart.N[62, 71, 90]PB, RN
Combretum mellifluum Eichler Combretum mellifluum EichlerN[61]MA

MutambaSterculiaceae Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. Guazuma ulmifolia Lam.N[1, 11, 54, 56, 66, 69, 82, 85, 86, 94]PE, PB, MA, BA
Ulmaceae Trema micrantha (L.) Blume Trema micrantha (L.) BlumeN[74]PI

PereiroApocynaccae Aspidosperma parvifolium A. DC. Aspidosperma parvifolium A. DC.N[94]PE
Aspidosperma pyrifolium Mart. Aspidosperma pyrifolium Mart.N[3, 52, 53, 58, 59, 62, 63, 70, 7377, 80, 88, 95]PE, PB, SE, PI, RN, BA
Tiliaceae Luehea ochrophylla Mart. Luehea ochrophylla Mart.N[56]PE

Pega pintoNyctaginaceae Boerhavia diffusa  L. Boerhavia diffusa  L.E[1, 3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 57, 59, 61, 63, 75, 76, 78, 90, 9395]PE, PB, SE, CE, PI, MA, RN
Boerhavia  coccinea Mill. Boerhavia  coccinea Mill.E[55, 60, 69]CE, BA
Boerhavia hirsuta Jacq.

PitangaMyrtaceae Eugenia uniflora  L. Eugenia uniflora  L.N[11, 52, 56, 63, 67, 69, 75, 76, 78, 79, 83, 93, 94]PE, CE, BA
Eugenia pitanga (O. Berg) Kiaersk. Eugenia pluriflora DC.N[84]BA

Pinhão roxoEuphorbiaceae Jatropha gossypiifolia  L. Jatropha gossypiifolia  L.N[56, 57, 69, 71, 75, 76, 78, 99]PE, PB, CE, PI, RN, BA
Jatropha ribifolia (Pohl) Baill. Jatropha ribifolia (Pohl) Baill.N[80]BA

PoejoLamiaceae Mentha pulegium  L. Mentha pulegium  L.E[53, 67, 83, 93]PE, BA

Quebra facaEuphorbiaceae Croton conduplicatus Kunth Croton conduplicatus KunthN[9]CE
Croton rhamnifolius Willd. Croton heliotropiifolius KunthN[53]PE
Croton cordiifolius Baill. Croton cordiifolius Baill. N[60]CE

QuiaboMalvaceae Hibiscus esculentus  L. Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) MoenchE[53, 55, 56, 66, 67, 76, 78, 84]PE, CE, MA, BA
Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench

QuinaRubiaceae Coutarea hexandra (Jacq.) K. Schum. Coutarea hexandra (Jacq.) K. Schum. N[9, 53, 58, 69, 71, 76, 86, 94]PE, PB, SE, CE, BA
Cinchona calisaya Wedd. Cinchona officinalis  L.N[66]MA
Simaroubaceae Quassia amara  L. Quassia amara  L.N[68]MA
Rubiaceae Chiococca brachiata Ruiz and Pav. Chiococca alba (L.) Hitchc.N[80]BA

RomãPunicaceae Punica granatum  L. Punica granatum  L.E[3, 9, 5355, 57, 61, 63, 65, 68, 69, 72, 76, 78, 79, 81, 83, 93, 99, 100]PE, PB, CE, PI, MA, RN, BA
Brassicaceae Armoracia rusticana G. Gaertn., B. Mey., and Scherb. Armoracia rusticana G. Gaertn., B. Mey., and Scherb.E[84]BA

SaiãoCrassulaceae Kalanchoe brasiliensis Cambess. Kalanchoe brasiliensis Cambess.E[3, 53, 72]PE, PB

Salsa Convolvulaceae Ipomoea asarifolia (Desr.) Roem. and Schult. Ipomoea asarifolia (Desr.) Roem. and Schult.N[11, 56, 57, 59, 60, 65, 78, 85, 89]PE, PB, CE, PI, RN
Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R. Br. Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R. Br.N[95]SE
Apiaceae Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) FussE[67]BA
Petroselinum sativum Hoffm. Petroselinum sativum Hoffm.E[84]BA

SambacaitáLamiaceae Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit. Hyptis pectinata (L.) Poit.N[58, 80, 93]PE, SE, BA
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.N[94]PE
Hyptis mutabilis (Rich.) Briq. Hyptis mutabilis (Rich.) Briq. N[76]PE

SenaFabaceae Senna acutifolia Link Senna alexandrina Mill.N[53]PE
Senna corymbosa (Lam.) H. S. Irwin and Barneby Senna corymbosa (Lam.) H. S. Irwin and BarnebyN[94]PE
Senna martiana (Benth.) H. S. Irwin and Barneby Senna martiana (Benth.) H. S. Irwin and BarnebyN[77]PB
Tephrosia purpurea (L.) Pers. Tephrosia purpurea (L.) Pers.N[69]BA

SucupiraFabaceae Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth Bowdichia virgilioides KunthN[1, 11, 56, 76, 86, 89, 98]PE, PB, CE
Bowdichia nitida Spruce ex Benth. Bowdichia nitida Spruce ex Benth.N[68]MA

TamarinoFabaceae Tamarindus indica  L. Tamarindus indica  L.E[9, 11, 56, 57, 61, 63, 72, 83, 84, 92, 93]PE, PB, CE, PI, MA, BA

GuinéPhytolacacceae Petiveria alliacea  L. Petiveria alliacea  L.N[53, 72, 84]PE, PB, BA
Petiveria tetrandra B. A. Gomes Petiveria tetrandra B. A. Gomes N[79]BA

UrucumBixaceae Bixa orellana  L. Bixa orellana  L.N[9, 55, 56, 61, 66, 69, 78, 81, 83, 84, 92]PE, CE, MA, RN, BA

TiriricaCyperaceae Cyperus ligularis  L. Cyperus ligularis  L.N[95]SE
Cyperus surinamensis Rottb. Cyperus surinamensis Rottb.N[95]SE
Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) Vahl Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) VahlN[95]SE
Fimbristylis littoralis Gaudich. Fimbristylis miliacea (L.) VahlN[95]SE

JuncoCyperaceae Eleocharis interstincta (Vahl) Roem. and Schult. Eleocharis interstincta (Vahl) Roem. and Schult.N[56]PE
Eleocharis elegans (Kunth) Roem. and Schult. Eleocharis elegans (Kunth) Roem. and Schult.N[60]CE
Cyperus articulatus  L. Cyperus articulatus  L.N[59]RN
Cyperus esculentus  L. Cyperus esculentus  L.N[54]PB

TomateSolanaceae Lycopersicon esculentum MilL. Solanum lycopersicum  L.E[56, 57, 67, 93, 99]PE, PI, RN
Physalis ixocarpa Brot. ex Hornem. Physalis philadelphica Lam.E[68]MA

TrapiáCapparidaceae Crataeva tapia  L. Crataeva tapia  L.E[53, 57, 63, 66, 70, 73, 75]PE, PB, PI, MA

Urtiga brancaEuphorbiaceae Cnidoscolus urens (L.) Arthur Cnidoscolus urens (L.) ArthurN[1, 11, 53, 56, 59, 71]PE, PB, RN
Cnidoscolus phyllacanthus (Mull. Arg.) Pax and L. Hoffm. Cnidoscolus phyllacanthus (Mull. Arg.) Pax and L. Hoffm.N[76]PE
Cnidoscolus infestus Pax and K. Hoffm. Cnidoscolus infestus Pax and K. Hoffm.N[77]PB
Lamiaceae Lamium album  L. Lamium album  L.E[100]PB
Loasaceae Aosa rupestris (Gardner) Weigend Aosa rupestris (Gardner) WeigendN[77]PB
Urticaceae Urtica urens  L. Urtica urens  L.E[54]PB

Jurema brancaFabaceae Piptadenia stipulacea (Benth.) Ducke Piptadenia stipulacea (Benth.) DuckeN[3, 11, 60, 90]PE, PB, CE, RN
Senegalia piauhiensis (Benth.) Seigler and Ebinger Senegalia piauhiensis (Benth.) Seigler and EbingerN[58]SE
Calliandra spinosa Ducke Calliandra spinosa DuckeN[90]RN
Mimosa ophthalmocentra Mart. ex Benth. Mimosa ophthalmocentra Mart. ex Benth.N[85]PB
Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir. Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir.N[95]SE
Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. Vachellia farnesiana (L.) Wight and Arn.N[63, 73]PE

Jurema pretaFabaceae Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir. Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir.N[1, 3, 9, 11, 52, 53, 5860, 63, 7073, 75, 7981, 85, 93, 95]PE, PB, SE, CE, RN, BA
Mimosa acutistipula (Mart.) Benth. Mimosa acutistipula (Mart.) Benth.N[54]PB

Jurubeba brancaSolanaceae Solanum rhytidoandrum Sendtn. Solanum rhytidoandrum Sendtn. N[58, 77, 88]PB, SE
Solanum polytrichum Moric. Solanum polytrichum Moric.N[82]BA
Solanum stipulaceum Roem. and Schult. Solanum stipulaceum Roem. and Schult.N[60]CE
Solanum albidum Dunal Solanum albidum DunalE[55]CE

Imburana de cheiroFabaceae Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A. C. Sm. Amburana cearensis (Allemão) A. C. Sm. N[1, 52, 57, 60, 63, 67, 72, 76, 77, 92]PE, PB, CE, PI
Anacardiaceae Myracrodruon urundeuva Allemão Myracrodruon urundeuva AllemãoN[53]PE

PE: Pernambuco, PB: Paraiba. SE: Sergipe, CE: Ceará. RN: Rio Grande do Norte, BA: Bahia, MA: Maranhão, PI: Piauí.

Analysis of the data corresponding to the state of Pernambuco alone identified 138 out of the 165 ethnospecies found in the northeast region, which exhibited correspondence with 203 species. The ratio of species to ethnospecies was 1.46. The pattern of correspondence included 89 (64%) instances of one-to-one correspondence and 49 (36%) of underdifferentiation; the homonym ethnospecies represented a total of 114 species. Comparison of the data from the state of Pernambuco and the northeast region showed variation in the number of one-to-one correspondences that was inversely proportional to the size of the sampled area, whereas the number of homonym ethnospecies varied in proportion to the size of the sampled area, as shown in Figure 1. Consequently, the homonym ethnospecies predominated in the northeast (NE) sample (G = 48.41; df = 1; P < 0.00001).
Figure 1

Percentages of ethnospecies that exhibited one-to-one correspondence and underdifferentiation marketing in the northeast region and the state of Pernambuco, Brazil.

In the group of homonym ethnospecies, 309 (74%) were representative of the native flora, and 109 (26%) were exotic species. In the group of ethnospecies with one-to-one correspondence, 15 (37%) were representative of the native flora and 26 (63%) were exotic species (Figure 2). The proportion of native species relative to the proportion of exotic species was therefore significantly greater for the under-differentiated ethnospecies compared to the one-to-one ethnospecies (G = 22.52; df = 1; P < 0.00001).
Figure 2

Percentages of native and exotic species in the group of ethnospecies that exhibited one-to-one correspondence and underdifferentiation marketing in the northeast region and the state of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Among the 418 homonym ethnospecies, 256 (61.3%) were congeneric (type 1 underdifferentiation), and 77 (18.4%) exhibited correspondence at the genus level only (type 2 underdifferentiation). That is to say, 61% of the species bear correspondence to at least one other species of the same genus with the same vernacular name, whereas 18.4% of the homonym ethnospecies exhibited correspondence with one or more species belonging to other genera in the same family. In some cases (20.3%), the homonym ethnospecies belonged to different families, such as the ethnospecies “fedegoso” (coffee senna) and “capeba” (cow-foot leaf) (Table 1).

4. Discussion

4.1. Hidden Diversity in Regional Markets

Knowledge of the hidden diversity of medicinal plant species represents an important tool because it might point to the possible patterns of substitution of homonym ethnospecies in a given area. In the case of northeast Brazil, 75% of the plants traded in regional public markets exhibit correspondence with more than one plant species. As most (74%) such species are representative of the native flora, we might infer that the regional markets are largely supplied by natural stocks. Because the demand for medicinal plants is continuously increasing [2], the gradual exhaustion or scarcity of resources might make the substitution of homonym ethnospecies unavoidable and increasingly more frequent, particularly in the large cities where 70% of the population resides [34] and where access to medicinal plants is primarily mediated by commerce. Precisely for that reason, it is safe to assert that semantic plurality is manifested most frequently at the public markets of large cities, which are privileged spaces where significant amounts of people, products, and knowledge circulate on a daily basis. Thus, such markets afford an extremely favorable scenario for comparative ethnobotanical studies at a regional level. In recent years, ethnobotanical research in regional public markets has provided an important platform for conservation studies and biological prospecting. However, the limitations to species identification represent the major hindrance to the growth of research in such locations [6] as well as to the assessment of hidden diversity and events of homonym ethnospecies substitution, as most of the plants are sold in parts or pieces that are sometimes completely uncharacteristic. For that reason, homonym ethnospecies go easily unnoticed when commercial medicinal species are cataloged, the more so the more remarkable the morphological similarities are. In this regard, 61.3% of the hidden diversity of the medicinal plants of the northeast region is congeneric, that is, exhibits type 1 underdifferentiation, which denotes phylogenetic proximity and consequently morphological similarity [102]. This similarity makes the understanding of the ethnobotanical data collected at public markets even more difficult. To prevent this situation, the criteria adopted for the identification of species by some studies conducted in regional public markets are based on the vernacular nomenclature, sometimes as a complementary identifier [12, 103] and other times as the primary criterion [6]. In places where the catalog of medicinal plants and the data relative to their biodiversity are comprehensive, common names might possibly be used quite safely. However, this is definitely not the case in Brazil, where the repertoire of medicinal plants in these marketing spaces is largely a hidden diversity. Additionally, due to the explicit difficulty of recognizing and identifying the plant species in public markets and the progressive increase in the substitution of homonym ethnospecies, the vulnerability of consumers tends to become more serious, and possible risks related to safety and efficacy might be potentiated when one species is indistinctly replaced with another. This phenomenon occurs because most of the Brazilian medicinal plant species have not yet been subjected to appropriate studies that would establish their use in a scientifically safe manner, so to speak, that is, describing their side effects, contraindications, toxicity, and effective therapeutic action. Because the only plant material available for species identification is that sold at the markets, whereas the harvesting sites are usually inaccessible due to their distance or the unavailability or mistrust of the harvesters—as a large part of harvesting is indiscriminate—the resolution of this impasse necessarily demands more specialized taxonomic procedures, such as micrography and molecular taxonomy. In this regard, several techniques have been widely applied to the resolution of this type of taxonomic problem [14, 15, 104–106], to support scientific research and as a tool for the surveillance and control of commercial plant and animal products. Barcoding is one of the most promising among such techniques and has already been applied to the identification of plant species in public markets [107]. This technique consists of the identification of species based on the differentiation of genetic sequences in specific DNA regions [108]. The use of molecular taxonomy might in time become a very important and practical tool for cataloging the hidden diversity in public markets and thus contribute to a better understanding of the biodiversity flow in a given area and, consequently, the frequency with which homonym ethnospecies are being interchangeably used in public markets. A reliable cataloging of this biodiversity affords multiple possibilities for further biological and cultural studies and must be considered as crucial for the advancement of ethnobotanical research.

4.2. Implications for Conservation

From the perspective of conservation at the regional level, one should not ignore the hidden diversity of medicinal plants, as this diversity represents the possible variations in the range of species that are effectively used relative to the multiplicity of homonym ethnospecies and the biological diversity of a given area. On such grounds, one might infer that the larger the number of homonym ethnospecies, the higher the odds that the pressure of use is, or might eventually become, distributed among more than one plant population, as in our study where a significant number of native homonym ethnospecies (74%) was found. When, conversely, the frequency of use predominantly affects one species, the risks are patently greater for the species affected but also for others with the same vernacular name, as due to substitution, those others might become subjected to an intense and fast extractivist pressure that compromises their resilience, particularly in the case of the most vulnerable populations, leading to their collapse. The species Myracrodruon urundeuva provides a good example of the possible impact of the extractivist pressure on more than one plant population. In this case, another species, Schinus terebinthifolius, which is also native and belongs to the same family, is currently traded under the same generic name (“aroeira”—Brazilian peppertree) in the city of Recife [1]. Therefore, these species are interchangeably used, even though they belong to different genera, as the used parts do not allow for a clear differentiation. It is possible that such homonym ethnospecies are being overlapped in an unconscious and undocumented manner at the points of sale, especially in the case of populations that are no longer easily found in their natural reservoirs and that precisely for that reason are subjected to substitution processes. For example, the case of “espinheira santa” (Maytenus ilicifolia), which following its long-term indiscriminate harvesting became a threatened species [109] and is associated with several substitute species that currently occupy the same semantic-therapeutic niche [110]. This type of approach must be taken into account upon establishing conservation priorities and efficient management strategies, as accurate knowledge of the hidden diversity of medicinal plants and the possibilities for efficient exchanges among homonym ethnospecies might favor a more balanced distribution of the extractivist pressure, thus minimizing its impact, avoiding the collapse of populations and promoting greater resilience. The applicability of hidden substitutions of species to biological conservation is thus in keeping with explicative models related to the utilitarian redundancy hypothesis [52], according to which a larger number of species within one utilitarian category leads to greater mutual support and protection of the associated species as well as increased resilience. Thus, we might assert that the phenomenon of the hidden diversity of medicinal plants gives support to utilitarian redundancy as an explanatory model for the pressure of use, as the overlapping species are subsumed under one and the same identity and consequently the same therapeutic indications, as their corresponding practical value is culturally well established. Because, based on the strength of tradition, the homonym ethnospecies are functional analogs, the remaining task is to distinguish each one of them and establish the level at which the preference for and/or access to each particular species occurs and then to define the degree of utilitarian redundancy, which is also hidden, so to speak. For that purpose, once again the elaboration of a taxonomically reliable record of this biodiversity is required. Within that context, the assessment of hidden and redundant biodiversity becomes an important predictive ecological tool, as a function of the perfect semantic-therapeutic juxtaposition of the homonym ethnospecies at the regional level. Public policies for the conservation, regulation, control, and use of medicinal plants in Brazil should not ignore the regional level and its implicit cultural and biological richness [111-113]. From this perspective, comparative ethnobotany will become an indispensable tool in decision making and actions aimed at the sustainable use of biodiversity.

4.3. Implications for Bioprospecting

Several studies [114-116] have found similar biochemical compositions in related species, which might point to similar uses within the range of applications already well established by tradition. The biochemical constitutions of species in the same family quite commonly include the same pattern of secondary components [114]. Nevertheless, the therapeutic efficacy and the risks associated with the use of the vast majority of species acknowledged as medicinal by the population have not yet been assessed [117]. With regard to the medicinal species whose safety and efficacy have been demonstrated, ethnobotanical studies that include their hidden diversity might contribute to the identification of more efficacious species as well as of those more promptly available for consumption. Therefore, the identification of homonym species with similar uses might not only reduce the pressure of use on the natural reservoirs but also allow for easier and more encompassing access for a larger number of people. In this regard, it is worth stressing that to be efficient, public policies addressing access to medicinal plants must take into consideration the natural distribution of the species, when it is spontaneous, and the limits of its ecophysiological tolerance, in the case of cultivated species. The identification of homonym species might represent an alternative in both cases. Recently, the Brazilian government published a list of 71 medicinal plant species recommended for use by the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde—SUS) [118]. As a function of the continental size of Brazil and its environmental diversity, the distributions of some of these medicinal species are not homogeneous across all regions. Species typical of the south and southeast regions are hardly found in the north and northeast regions, and vice versa. Therefore, in both cases, there are homonym ethnospecies occupying the same semantic-therapeutic niche of many species in the corresponding region. The case of Uncaria tomentosa is exemplary. This plant, native to Amazonia (north region), is commonly known as “unha de gato” (cat's claw) and acknowledged for its remarkable anti-inflammatory activity. Although it was included in the SUS list, access to this plant is extremely restricted in other Brazilian regions, which, however, will not prevent the emergence of other types of “cat's claw.” There are at least six different species known as “cat's claw” in the northeast region alone, five of which are native and one subspontaneous, corresponding to four different families, thus denoting the generality of the common name and the particularity of the biological expression. According to Albuquerque and Hanazaki [119] one of the basic rules in biological prospecting is to identify the criteria used by people to select plants for medicinal use. According to those authors, the process underlying such selection might point to more efficacious strategies and shortcuts for the identification of key species relevant to bioprospecting. A preliminary assessment of the distributions of the ethnospecies in the present study indicated that several species, including exotic ones established centuries ago, have corresponding homonym ethnospecies from the local flora. This is the case for cinnamon, watercress, elder tree, artichoke, clove basil, plum, and rosemary, among others (see Table 1). Such correspondences were also found when medicinal plant species were compared with the names of drugs (generic and trademarks names) with widely acknowledged therapeutic effects, such as Meracilina, penicillin, Novalgina, aspirin, Terramycin, and ampicillin, among others [9, 11, 24, 93, 120, 121]. In such cases, the species is named after its corresponding drug name, thus representing a flagrant instance of classification based on analogical use. Similarly, based on the wide variety and distribution of homonym ethnospecies, we might infer that the development of knowledge at the local level seeks to subsume the available biodiversity under the already established and culturally consolidated semantic-therapeutic patterns. For that reason, when key species with high cultural relevance are absent, the communities tend to opt for species substitutions [52]. As a function of the existence of semantic-therapeutic niches and the impossibility of filling them with traditionally acknowledged species, an analogy-based local process appears to be triggered. According to the available data, several mechanisms of cultural selection are operative in this analogy-based local process, whereby the most fitting pieces of local knowledge become prevalent and amplified across the community, pointing to the locally accessible species, which thus come to be used as corresponding (homonym) ethnospecies. This hypothesis is corroborated by the high frequency of homonym ethnospecies representing the native flora (73%). Comparative ethnobotanical studies of different regions might eventually elucidate the possible role of vernacular names as models for the manifestation of the expression of local biodiversity or the measure and circumstances under which a peculiar regional classification system tends to prevail at the expense of allochthonous and/or general systems. In addition, the identification of the level of semantic similarity of species at the local level might contribute to a better understanding of the process of construction of local/regional knowledge and make the planning of the use, prospection, and conservation of these resources more efficient [122].

5. Conclusions

Regardless of being a frequent process, affecting either some or the full set of species of a given region, the substitution of homonym ethnospecies denotes a novel consumption option for a well-established cultural practice involving limited products within a commercial niche consolidated by tradition. For that reason, even where the level, frequency, and circumstances under which such substitutions occur might not be identified in the near future, some relevant questions have already been raised. Such questions, which might contribute to optimizing the use of medicinal plants in a safe and more sustainable manner, include the following. (1) How might the homonym species be alternately used for the same therapeutic action and how efficacious are they? (2) For which homonym ethnospecies might divergent uses, absence, or differences in the level of therapeutic efficacy be currently listed? (3) What are the health risks to people who, either travelling or at their original place of residence, indiscriminately consume different species subsumed under the same common name? (4) What tools might be created to support consumers and researchers in the understanding and interpretation of the semantic plurality associated with medicinal plants? (5) Which bioprospecting actions and management plans have taken the hidden diversity of species at the regional level into consideration? The fact that a significant percentage of the common names of plants in the Brazilian northeast region exhibits correspondences to multiple species is irrevocably established. A more thorough understanding of the dynamics and dimensions of such semantic-biological variability and the corresponding implications requires the integration of several areas of knowledge, including taxonomy, biochemistry, population ecology, phytosociology, linguistics, and anthropology. The proportion of species found by ethnospecies (2.78) was significant, although we recognize that a more comprehensive coverage of markets and fairs in the nine northeastern states could lead to an increase of this proportion or even the emergence of new ethnospecies not listed in this survey. To what concerns the low number of respondents committed to the study, in all the six markets visited, it should be clarified that the purpose of the field survey was to catalogue ethnospecies currently marketed in order to support the identification of the corresponding species through the literature search.
  25 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The herbal market of Thessaloniki (N Greece) and its relation to the ethnobotanical tradition.

Authors:  E Hanlidou; R Karousou; V Kleftoyanni; S Kokkini
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.360

4.  Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny.

Authors:  Quentin D Wheeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Dynamics of medicinal plants knowledge and commerce in an urban ecosystem (Pernambuco, Northeast Brazil).

Authors:  Julio Marcelino Monteiro; Marcelo Alves Ramos; Elcida de Lima Araújo; Elba Lúcia Cavalcanti Amorim; Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Medicinal plants with bioprospecting potential used in semi-arid northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Sarahbelle Leitte Cartaxo; Marta Maria de Almeida Souza; Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.360

7.  Ethnopharmacological survey of traditional drugs sold in the Kingdom of Jordan.

Authors:  Efraim Lev; Zohar Amar
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.360

8.  Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants at periodic markets of Honghe Prefecture in Yunnan Province, SW China.

Authors:  Sangwoo Lee; Chunjie Xiao; Shengji Pei
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.360

9.  Study bioprospecting of medicinal plant extracts of the semiarid northeast: contribution to the control of oral microorganisms.

Authors:  Maria Suênia P Silva; Deysiane O Brandão; Thiago P Chaves; Amaro L N Formiga Filho; Edja Maria M de B Costa; Vanda L Santos; Ana Cláudia D Medeiros
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Medicinal plants popularly used in the Xingó region - a semi-arid location in Northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Cecília de Fátima C B R Almeida; Elba Lúcia Cavalcanti de Amorim; Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque; Maria Bernadete S Maia
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.733

View more
  5 in total

1.  Social organization influences the exchange and species richness of medicinal plants in Amazonian homegardens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.403

2.  Antinociceptive Effect of the Essential Oil Obtained from the Leaves of Croton cordiifolius Baill. (Euphorbiaceae) in Mice.

Authors:  Lenise de Morais Nogueira; Monalisa Ribeiro da Silva; Simone Maria Dos Santos; Julianna Ferreira Cavalcanti de Albuquerque; Igor Cavalcanti Ferraz; Thaíse Torres de Albuquerque; Carlos Renato França de Carvalho Mota; Renata Mendonça Araújo; Glauce Socorro de Barros Viana; René Duarte Martins; Alexandre Havt; Rafael Matos Ximenes
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Physiological changes for drought resistance in different species of Phyllanthus.

Authors:  Elenilson G Alves Filho; Luiza N Braga; Lorena Mara A Silva; Fábio R Miranda; Ebenézer O Silva; Kirley M Canuto; Maria Raquel Miranda; Edy S de Brito; Guilherme J Zocolo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  ETHNOBIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS USED FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN OF A TRADITIONAL COMMUNITY IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF BARBALHA, CEARÁ, BRAZIL.

Authors:  Izabel Cristina Santiago Lemos; Gyllyandeson de Araújo Delmondes; Ana Deyva Ferreira Dos Santos; Enaide Soares Santos; Dayanne Rakelly de Oliveira; Patrícia Rosane Leite de Figueiredo; Dailon de Araújo Alves; Roseli Barbosa; Irwin Rose Alencar de Menezes; Henrique Douglas Melo Coutinho; Marta Regina Kerntopf; George Pimentel Fernandes
Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med       Date:  2016-07-03

Review 5.  Subtribe Hyptidinae (Lamiaceae): A promising source of bioactive metabolites.

Authors:  Henrique Bridi; Gabriela de Carvalho Meirelles; Gilsane Lino von Poser
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.360

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.