Literature DB >> 24227486

Effects of diet on localized defecation by Northern Pike,Esox lucius.

G E Brown1, D P Chivers, R J Smith.   

Abstract

Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) are able to detect conspecific alarm pheromone in the feces of northern pike (Esox lucius) and have been shown to avoid areas labeled with the feces of pike that were fed minnows. The minnows did not avoid areas labeled with the feces of pike that were fed swordtails (Xiphophorous helleri), which lack ostariophysan alarm pheromone. In laboratory experiments, pike fed a diet of minnows localized their defecation away from their foraging area. It has been suggested that in doing so, pike may remove chemical cues that label their foraging area as dangerous to prey species. As yet there has been no conclusive evidence to support this hypothesis. In this experiment, we test the effects of different predator diets on localized defecation by pike. Pike were fed minnows, swordtails, or mice (Mus musculus). Swordtails and mice lack ostariophysan alarm pheromones. Area use and location of feces were recorded. Pike fed minnows spent significantly more time in the home area (i.e., area of the test tank where they were fed) and defecated significantly more often in the opposite end of the tank. Pike fed swordtails also exhibited a significant preference for the home area in area use, while those fed mice showed no such preference. When fed either swordtails or mice, there was no significant difference between the proportion of time spent and proportion of feces in each area of the test tank. These data suggest that pike localize their defecation only when consuming prey items containing alarm pheromone. The current findings support the hypothesis that pike localize their defecation to remove chemical cues from the foraging area of the home range in order to avoid chemically labeling their foraging area as dangerous to prey.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24227486     DOI: 10.1007/BF02033649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  6 in total

1.  Cross-reaction to skin extract between two gobies,Asterropteryx semipunctatus andBrachygobius sabanus.

Authors:  R J Smith; B J Lawrence; M J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Demonstration and analysis of an alarm pheromone in mice.

Authors:  S J Rottman; C T Snowdon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-12

3.  Risk-sensitive habitat use by brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) in areas associated with minnow alarm pheromone.

Authors:  B D Wisenden; D P Chivers; R J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Intra- and interspecific avoidance of areas marked with skin extract from brook sticklebacks (Culaea inconstans) in a natural habitat.

Authors:  D P Chivers; R J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas).

Authors:  A Mathis; R J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Behavioral response of solitary fathead minnows,Pimephales promelas, to alarm substance.

Authors:  B J Lawrence; R J Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.626

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Nature of Predation Risk Cues in Container Systems: Mosquito Responses to Solid Residues From Predation.

Authors:  Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Risky behaviors: effects of Toxorhynchites splendens (Diptera: Culicidae) predator on the behavior of three mosquito species.

Authors:  Wan Fatma Zuharah; Nik Fadzly; Nur Aishah Yusof; Hamady Dieng
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Can species-specific prey responses to chemical cues explain prey susceptibility to predation?

Authors:  Marek Šmejkal; Daniel Ricard; Zuzana Sajdlová; Martin Čech; Lukáš Vejřík; Petr Blabolil; Ivana Vejříková; Marie Prchalová; Mojmír Vašek; Allan T Souza; Christer Brönmark; Jiří Peterka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.912

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.