Robert MacLaren1, Candice R Preslaski2, Scott W Mueller3, Tyree H Kiser3, Douglas N Fish3, James C Lavelle4, Stephen P Malkoski4. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA rob.maclaren@ucdenver.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA. 4. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sedation with dexmedetomidine may facilitate ventilator liberation and limit the occurrence of delirium. No trial has assessed patient recall or the development of psychological outcomes after dexmedetomidine sedation. This pilot study evaluated whether transitioning benzodiazepine sedation to dexmedetomidine alters patient recall and the incidence of anxiety, depression, or acute stress disorder (ASD). METHODS: This investigation was a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Existing continuous benzodiazepine sedation was converted to dexmedetomidine or midazolam when patients qualified for daily awakenings. Sedation was titrated to achieve Riker sedation agitation scores of 3 to 4. The intensive care unit (ICU) Stressful Experiences Questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and the impact of event scale-revised were administered before hospital discharge to assess recall, anxiety, depression, and manifestations of ASD. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients received dexmedetomidine, and 12 patients received midazolam. Median dosing was 0.61 µg/kg/h for 3.5 days for dexmedetomidine and 3.7 mg/h for 3 days for midazolam. Attainment of goal sedation and analgesia was similar; however, more dexmedetomidine patients experienced agitation and pain. The median duration of mechanical ventilation from study drug initiation to extubation was 3.4 days in dexmedetomidine patients and 2.9 days in midazolam patients. Dexmedetomidine patients remembered 18.5 experiences compared with 8.5 in midazolam patients (P = .015). Rates of anxiety and depression were similar. In all, 5 (62.5%) dexmedetomidine patients and 1 (12.5%) midazolam patient manifested ASD (P = .063), and 1 dexmedetomidine patient and 5 midazolam patients developed new-onset delirium (P = .07). Hypotension occurred in 10 (90.9%) dexmedotomidine patients and 6 (50%) midazolam patients (P = .069). CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning benzodiazepine sedation to dexmedetomidine when patients qualify for daily awakenings may reduce the development of delirium and facilitate remembrance of ICU experiences but may lead to manifestations of ASD. Monitoring hypotension is required for both the sedatives. Additional comparative studies focusing on the long-term impact of ICU recall and psychological outcomes are needed.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Sedation with dexmedetomidine may facilitate ventilator liberation and limit the occurrence of delirium. No trial has assessed patient recall or the development of psychological outcomes after dexmedetomidine sedation. This pilot study evaluated whether transitioning benzodiazepine sedation to dexmedetomidine alters patient recall and the incidence of anxiety, depression, or acute stress disorder (ASD). METHODS: This investigation was a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Existing continuous benzodiazepine sedation was converted to dexmedetomidine or midazolam when patients qualified for daily awakenings. Sedation was titrated to achieve Riker sedation agitation scores of 3 to 4. The intensive care unit (ICU) Stressful Experiences Questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and the impact of event scale-revised were administered before hospital discharge to assess recall, anxiety, depression, and manifestations of ASD. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients received dexmedetomidine, and 12 patients received midazolam. Median dosing was 0.61 µg/kg/h for 3.5 days for dexmedetomidine and 3.7 mg/h for 3 days for midazolam. Attainment of goal sedation and analgesia was similar; however, more dexmedetomidinepatients experienced agitation and pain. The median duration of mechanical ventilation from study drug initiation to extubation was 3.4 days in dexmedetomidinepatients and 2.9 days in midazolampatients. Dexmedetomidinepatients remembered 18.5 experiences compared with 8.5 in midazolampatients (P = .015). Rates of anxiety and depression were similar. In all, 5 (62.5%) dexmedetomidinepatients and 1 (12.5%) midazolampatient manifested ASD (P = .063), and 1 dexmedetomidinepatient and 5 midazolampatients developed new-onset delirium (P = .07). Hypotension occurred in 10 (90.9%) dexmedotomidinepatients and 6 (50%) midazolampatients (P = .069). CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning benzodiazepine sedation to dexmedetomidine when patients qualify for daily awakenings may reduce the development of delirium and facilitate remembrance of ICU experiences but may lead to manifestations of ASD. Monitoring hypotension is required for both the sedatives. Additional comparative studies focusing on the long-term impact of ICU recall and psychological outcomes are needed.
Authors: Fayez Alshamsi; Kallirroi Laiya Carayannopoulos; Anders Granholm; Joshua Piticaru; Kimberley Lewis; Zainab Al Duhailib; Dipayan Chaudhuri; Laura Spatafora; Yuhong Yuan; John Centofanti; Jessica Spence; Bram Rochwerg; Dan Perri; Dale M Needham; Anne Holbrook; John W Devlin; Osamu Nishida; Kimia Honarmand; Begüm Ergan; Eugenia Khorochkov; Pratik Pandharipande; Mohammed Alshahrani; Tim Karachi; Mark Soth; Yahya Shehabi; Morten Hylander Møller; Waleed Alhazzani Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: Julian Flükiger; Alexa Hollinger; Benjamin Speich; Vera Meier; Janna Tontsch; Tatjana Zehnder; Martin Siegemund Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 6.925