Literature DB >> 24227122

Comparison of selected lactate threshold parameters with maximal lactate steady state in cycling.

T Hauser1, J Adam2, H Schulz1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to compare power at "onset of blood lactate accumulation" (OBLA), "individual anaerobic threshold" (IAT) and "+1.5 mmol ∙ l(-1) lactate model" with power in maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) in cycling. However, there is a lack of studies concerning the absolute individual differences between different lactate parameters and MLSS.A total of 57 male participants performed several 30-min constant-load tests to determine MLSS by measuring blood lactate concentration (BLC). Depending on BLC, power was increased or decreased by 10 W in the following 30-min test. For detecting power at different threshold parameters, an incremental test was performed that began at 40 W and increased by 40 W every 4 min.Highly significant correlations were found between OBLA and MLSS: r=0.89 (mean difference -7.4 W); IAT and MLSS: r=0.83 (mean difference 12.4W), "+1.5 mmol ∙ l(-1) lactate model" and MLSS: r=0.88 (mean difference -37.4W). On average, the parameters of OBLA and IAT approximate MLSS with no significant differences. The "+1.5 mmol ∙ l(-1) lactate model" underestimates MLSS significantly.Based on Bland-and-Altman, the comparison of power of all threshold parameters with power in MLSS shows great individual differences despite the high regression coefficients and low mean differences between these methods. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24227122     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  8 in total

1.  Is the maximal lactate steady state concept really relevant to predict endurance performance?

Authors:  Max Niemeyer; Margrit Gündisch; Gina Steinecke; Raphael Knaier; Ralph Beneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Reliability of the calculated maximal lactate steady state in amateur cyclists.

Authors:  J Adam; M Öhmichen; E Öhmichen; J Rother; U M Müller; T Hauser; H Schulz
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.806

3.  The midpoint between ventilatory thresholds approaches maximal lactate steady state intensity in amateur cyclists.

Authors:  A B Peinado; Dm Pessôa Filho; V Díaz; P J Benito; M Álvarez-Sánchez; A G Zapico; F J Calderón
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Training Intensity Distribution and Changes in Performance and Physiology of a 2nd Place Finisher Team of the Race across America Over a 6 Month Preparation Period.

Authors:  Christian Manunzio; Joachim Mester; Walter Kaiser; Patrick Wahl
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Manipulating graded exercise test variables affects the validity of the lactate threshold and [Formula: see text].

Authors:  Nicholas A Jamnick; Javier Botella; David B Pyne; David J Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Profiling the Aerobic Window of Horses in Response to Training by Means of a Modified Lactate Minimum Speed Test: Flatten the Curve.

Authors:  Lorie De Maré; Berit Boshuizen; Carmen Vidal Moreno de Vega; Constance de Meeûs; Lukas Plancke; Yannick Gansemans; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter Deforce; Jean Eduardo de Oliveira; Guilherme Hosotani; Maarten Oosterlinck; Catherine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Comparison of calculated and experimental power in maximal lactate-steady state during cycling.

Authors:  Thomas Hauser; Jennifer Adam; Henry Schulz
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.432

8.  Validity and Reliability of Ventilatory and Blood Lactate Thresholds in Well-Trained Cyclists.

Authors:  Jesús G Pallarés; Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Juan Fernando Ortega; Valentín Emilio Fernández-Elías; Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.